August 21, 2006
Progressive Indictment, By
Randall Burns
My Conversation With Ernest (Ecotopia)
Callenbach
Ernest Callenbach is one of the most influential
authors in the area of social activism and ecology in
the last several decades. His 1974 classic
Ecotopia,
a
futuristic fantasy about an environmentally-sound
breakaway country based in the
Pacific Northwest, enormously influenced
a generation of activists.
A little-noticed
fact:
In Ecotopia, there was a
significant period of closed borders (or more precisely,
one way—out) during the transition to a
“sustainable economy.”
Callenbach has
given me permission to post my recent correspondence
with him. I wrote:
“I read
Ecotopia and several of your other works
years ago, and met you during a talk you gave in
San Francisco in the 1980s. What are your current
thoughts on the recent immigration debate? My own recent
writings are found
here and
here.
“I remember
Ecotopia as having a rather different attitude on
immigration than anything we’ve seen in recent years.
“I think I can expose
your viewpoint to readers for whom it will be new–and
encourage communication across ideological lines if you
were to make some comments for VDARE.COM readers.”
Callenbach replied:
“I’m not writing
much anymore, and don’t have any brilliant thoughts to
contribute on the immigration question in particular.
The Ecotopian position of totally
closed borders—they only let people LEAVE—now seems
(for any part of the world) what
Alberto Gonzales would probably consider ‘quaint’.
“But I agree with
what I take to be your position about the
class role of
high-immigration proponents, though I would go even
farther and say that it must be understood as part of a
larger long-term looter program, a.k.a. the hollowing
out of the American empire. Marx famously and correctly
said,
‘Capital has no country,’ but it took until recently
for us to see how globalization would in fact evolve to
prove him right. . . .
“My own
perspective being primarily ecological, I must say that
the greatest problem with population is internal
overpopulation in this sense: what the ecological world
is basically suffering from is too many rich consuming
people–in Japan, North America, and Europe. [Readers
might investigate the ‘
ecological
footprint’ concept—if you put that into Google
you will come up with
some very interesting stuff—though the elites in
Asia and Latin America are beginning to have important
impacts too, of course.]
“But politicians
everywhere are overwhelmingly economisticly-minded, so
probably the long-term dim prospects of industrial
consumer capitalism will only beat their way into the
discourse when oil prices get to maybe $10 a gallon and
it becomes clear that the suburban auto-centered
American ideal is dying. It won’t matter much then whose
hands are on the steering wheels.”
I asked Callenbach:
“What kinds of
conditions do you think Ecotopians might have made
before allowing
limited immigration or
tourism into their country? Might they for example
have set a quota allowing as many entrants from a
country as Ecotopians emigrated to that country?”
To this, Callenbach replied:
“The Ecotopians
seek a
slowly diminishing population; they find economies
in shrinking scale, as well as diminished ecological
impacts.”
I questioned him further:
“When you say
‘suburban
auto-centered American ideal is dying,’ what sort of
reactions do you anticipate to this in the near future?
Do you think the kind of
breakup of the US you described in Ecotopia
is becoming more likely?”
Callenbach in effect agreed. He replied:
“I have been
forced to admit that humans are more like
mules than we like to admit: we only
pay attention when hit by a 2×4, and post-peak oil
is altogether likely to be the 2×4.
“Gradually, local
solutions will come to seem more attractive than global
or even national ones. The
logic behind Joel Garreau’s wonderful ‘
Nine
Nations of North America’ will get steadily
stronger.”
As a progressive, I
argue there is a constituency on the left for
immigration reform. I read Callenbach’s response to
confirm this, if reluctantly—and also to confirm a
progressive constituency for, if necessary, radical
reorganization of America.
Randall Burns [email him]
holds a
degree in Economics from the University of Chicago. He
works in the information technology sector and is a
graduate student at Carnegie Mellon University. Burns
has been active in furthering the introduction of
immigration, trade, and tax realities into the
progressive agenda. In 2004, he helped create the Kucinich campaign’s position paper on
H-1b/L-1 visas.