Peter
Brimelow writes: We
know many
VDARE.COM
readers depend upon
this bulletin, so
will not be aware of
the slow start of
our Christmas
fundraising drive.
I'm gratified by the
number of readers
who have now rallied
round and made small
donations in
response to my
latest appeal. But
we still need
donations,
especially a few
large ones - to you
large donors out
there with capital
gains, remember
there are only
THIRTEEN
tax-deductible days
left in 2007.
Many thanks.
Like everyone else
in the political/
media/ fundraising
world -or at least
everyone not totally
bamboozled by
Beltway bigshots-I
am fascinated by the
internet phenomenon
of Congressman Ron
Paul's apparently
open-source
wiki-campaign for
the Republican
Party's presidential
nomination.
You'll be hearing a
lot more about the
remarkable Paul
campaign as you read
this. That's because
on Sunday, December
16, the 234th
anniversary of the
Boston Tea Party,
Paul's volunteers
threw another
"moneybomb".
They hoped to raise
$10 million in one
day, from more than
100,000 individual
donors.
On November 5, Guy
Fawkes Day, they
raised a record $4.3
million from 18,000
donors. This time,
they raised $6.026
million, beating
John Kerry's one-day
take of 5,7 million
in 2004.
I hasten to say
that, for legal
reasons, VDARE.COM
cannot take a
position on
electoral politics.
And it cannot
endorse candidates.
(However, in
September, we did
publish an
illuminating
interview with Dr.
Paul on the
relationship between
libertarianism and
immigration, which
we published under
the headline Ron
Paul: "I Believe In
National
Sovereignty".
You can read it
here. We
hope also to
interview other
candidates on the
intellectual issues
raised by America's
immigration disaster
in the next few
weeks).
Nevertheless, I
still can't help
brooding about the
Paul phenomenon.
One thought, rather
wistful, that occurs
to me: how much
easier it is to
raise money for
political candidates
than for the
development of
ideas.
It's understandable.
People are naturally
drawn to the
horse-race, to the
focus on
personalities, to
the thrill of
participating in a
hot current event.
Yet, ultimately, the
development of ideas
matters much more. I
am not particularly
a fan of the British
economist John
Maynard Keynes, but
I still don't think
it's possible to put
it better than he
did in the
conclusion of his
major work, The
General Theory:
"[T]he ideas of
economists and
political
philosophers, both
when they are right
and when they are
wrong, are more
powerful than is
commonly understood.
Indeed the world is
ruled by little
else. Practical men,
who believe
themselves to be
quite exempt from
any intellectual
influences, are
usually the slaves
of some defunct
economist. Madmen in
authority, who hear
voices in the air,
are distilling their
frenzy from some
academic scribbler
of a few years back.
I am sure that the
power of vested
interests is vastly
exaggerated compared
with the gradual
encroachment of
ideas. Not, indeed,
immediately, but
after a certain
interval; for in the
field of economic
and political
philosophy there are
not many who are
influenced by new
theories after they
are twenty-five or
thirty years of age,
so that the ideas
which civil servants
and politicians and
even agitators apply
to current events
are not likely to be
the newest. But,
soon or late, it is
ideas, not vested
interests, which are
dangerous for good
or evil."
It is ideas,
developed over many
years, that draw
Paul's disparate
coalition together
and inspire its many
volunteers.
For example, two of
Paul's ideas that
especially delighted
us at VDARE.COM:
 |
the
importance
of ending
the current
interpretation
of the 14th
Amendment of
the U.S.
Constitution,
whereby the
U.S.-born
children of
illegal
aliens are
technically
U.S.
citizens; |
 |
the
necessity
and utility
of the
nation-state-unlike
the late
Wall Street
Journal
editor Bob
Bartley, who
once told me
he believed
the
nation-state
was finished
and the U.S.
would
eventually
merge with
its regional
neighbors
(although he
never dared
say this in
print.) |
Both these ideas
have preoccupied
VDARE.COM since it
began, on Christmas
Eve 1999.
I'm not saying that
Paul was influenced
by us. He's utterly
his own man.
But when I read that
another presidential
candidate tried to
brush off a voter by
telling him that
birthright
citizenship is
"in the
Constitution",
only to have him
reply that it's just
an amendable
interpretation, not
the original intent
at all-well, I think
that voter might
well have read the
definitive article
by Howard Sutherland
that we posted back
in 2001.
Of course, Howard's
article is still
available, free like
all our articles, in
our archives. It
gets constant
traffic and readers
constantly email it
out. You can read it
here.
What this means is
that investing in
think-tanks like
VDARE.COM and its
parent VDARE
Foundation is a
bargain! We can
operate for a whole
year on a fraction
of one of Paul's
"moneybombs".
But we do need at
least something.
Call it a
"moneybullet".
A second thought
that occurs to me,
contemplating the
Paul phenomenon:
what a gift from God
this internet is.
Of course, Paul's
campaign would be
impossible without
it. But casting
around to avoid the
unpleasant work of
writing this appeal,
I came across this
passage that I wrote
during our Christmas
appeal last year,
when Washington was
still reverberating
from the Democrats'
seizing control of
the U.S. House and
Senate the previous
month:
"The
Washington Times
reported Monday
morning that amnesty
for the 12-20
million illegal
aliens is likely the
only thing that the
Bush White House and
the
Democratic-controlled
Congress will be
able to agree on
next year. But it
may not work out the
way Beltway insiders
think-because now
the internet
provides ways for
patriotic Americans
to organize.
VDARE.COM is proud
to be part of this
grass-roots American
resistance-but we
can only do it if we
have money to pay
our hard-working
writers."
My underlining! I
was delighted to see
this prediction,
which I'd actually
forgotten making.
That the internet
was critical to the
astonishing defeat
of the Kennedy-Bush
Amnesty this past
summer is, of
course, now widely
acknowledged.
And the defeat of
the Kennedy-Bush
Amnesty is the key
reason all the
Republican
presidential
candidate are now at
least paying
lip-service to
stopping illegal
immigration-and why
Hillary Clinton
fumbled, possibly
fatally, a question
in the recent
Democratic debate on
drivers licenses for
illegals.
It may well lead to
the immigration
issue becoming a
major issue
(finally!) in the
Presidential
election this fall.
In fact, the defeat
of Kennedy-Bush may
well be seen as the
point at which
patriotic
immigration reform
became inevitable.
But it couldn't
happen without the
internet. The
miracle of the
internet has made it
possible for a tiny
operation like
VDARE.COM to break
through the opinion
oligopoly and reach
a large and growing
audience purely by
word of mouth. Or,
strictly speaking,
click of mouse-our
articles are Googled
into and forwarded
by readers to
friends all over the
world.
All we have to do is
come up with facts
and arguments that
don't appear
anywhere else.
If they are posted,
readers will come.
Of course, in the
area of immigration
and related National
Question topics,
it's very easy to
find new facts and
arguments. A
particularly vicious
form of Political
Correctness has
paralyzed debate,
not just in liberal
but also in the
purportedly
"conservative"
media.
But we have to
work-hard. We post
every day. Our
articles are of the
highest professional
quality. I didn't
spend thirty years
in the Mainstream
Media for nothing.
(Well, for almost
nothing. But that's
another story). The
last seven years
have been an
enormous effort for
everyone at
VDARE.COM. I came by
that airbrush
honestly!
And-we need money.
Not a lot of
money-we don't have
to pay printers and
postage, like even
the smallest
treezine. ("Treezine"
= paper, as opposed
to electronic
"e-zines."
Geddit?) We don't
have expensive
offices. In fact, we
don't have any
offices-we work
entirely virtually.
But we do need
money. Here's why.
One of the really
impressive things
about the internet,
to me as a long-time
professional
journalist, is that
it demonstrates the
sheer amount of real
talent there is out
there. It turns out
there is no magic to
journalism. There
are vast numbers of
able, serious,
people out there who
can beat
professional
journalists at their
own game-if they
have the outlet. The
internet has
provided that
outlet.
But if you study the
blogosphere, you
also realize that
even the most
brilliant bloggers
have a relatively
short half-life.
They burn out.
Writing on a
sustained basis is
harder work than it
looks, especially if
you have to back it
up with the sort of
research we insist
upon at VDARE.COM.
It cannot be kept up
on air.
Paying writers
modest sums has been
VDARE.COM's secret
weapon.
It gets their
attention. Cheers
them up. Inspires
them.
There are only 13
days left to give
tax-deductibly to
VDARE.COM in 2007.
Please hit us with a
moneybullet now!
Many thanks,
Peter Brimelow
Readers report
that PayPal is now
making TWO confusing
efforts to get you
to sign up for its
proprietary
system option when
you just want to
make a one-time
credit card payment
to VDARE.com.
When you click on
the "credit card"
link below (HINT!),
you go to our
donation page. If
you click on
"make a donation"
in the credit card
section, you see
the PayPal login
stuff on the right -
and the Don't Have
PayPal
account?/credit card
option in very small
print on the bottom
left.
If you click on
"continue"
there, basically the
same page comes up
EXCEPT THAT you can
enter a payment
amount, top right.
If you do that
and then again click
on "continue",
bottom left, it
gives up trying to
get you to sign up
for PayPal and takes
you to a page where
you can enter your
credit card
information.
PayPal is a great
system, but its
marketing people
are aggressive -
like those
annoying ads on
newspaper websites,
something I really
want to avoid on
VDARE.COM. (HINT!
HINT)
 |
You
can
donate
(tax-deductibly!)
by
check (click
to get form
for easier
mailing) or
credit
card-and
you can do
it
monthly
if you
prefer.
ALSO: you
can now
fax
your credit
card info!
Donations
are
tax-deductible. |
 |
We are
delighted
see
donations of
any
size-$10,
100, $1,000,
$10,000. But
we do feel
especially
good about
the larger
ones! |
 |
To
receive the
special
VDARE.COM
issue of
The Social
Contract
with a
donation of
$50.00,
please email
office@vdare.com
specifying
that you
would like
this gift
and giving
us the
mailing
address you
would like
it sent to.
Also
available: 3
copies for a
$75 donation
or 5 for
$100 |
 |
A
signed
ALIEN
NATION to
our top
donor as a
result of
this appeal!
Current
record:
$10,000 |
 |
Guarantee
a hard copy
ALIEN NATION
by
donating
$1,000 |
 |
And don't
forget - you
can give
stock! You
could help
us more
at no
cost by
avoiding
capital
gains tax!
(Email
donate@vdare.com
for details) |
NOTE: VDARE.COM
is no longer
associated with the
Center For American
Unity, which plans
to focus on
litigation. We are
grateful for their
past help and wish
them well in future.
Our sponsor is now
the VDARE
Foundation, a
501(c)(3) charity.
(For today's
postings, click
here)