|
August 20, 2007
The Washington Post And The Color of Crime
By
Patrick J. Buchanan
The execution-style murder
of
three African-American college students" in Newark,
N.J., forced to kneel and shot in the head—allegedly by
an illegal alien from Peru who was
out on bail for the serial rape of a 5-year-old—has
the makings of a
Willie Horton issue in 2008.
Newark, like New York, is
a
"sanctuary city,"
where cops are
not to ask criminal suspects if they are in the
country legally. Mitt Romney has been
hammering Rudy Giuliani on the issue, trashing his
tough-cop resume by painting the mayor as den mother of
the Big Apple's
playpen for illegal aliens.
The arrest of Jose
Carranza in that Newark massacre, amid reports he had
Hispanic accomplices and the murders may have been part
of a
gang initiation, has also elevated the
issue of the
black-brown war raging in
U.S. big cities.
In the Aug. 10 Washington
Post story that covered the Carranza arrest, the
same page had two related articles. One was headlined,
"Study: Almost Half of Murder Victims Black,"
the other, "Slaying of Popular Editor Stuns Blacks in
Oakland." [Vdare.com note:
Apparently this was changed in the final edit to
For Some in Oakland, Editor's Death Shows Subversion of
Black Activism By
Karl Vick.]
The second headline
reveals an ideological slant. One would assume that
everyone in Oakland was stunned by the daylight
execution of African-American editor
Chauncey Bailey, allegedly by a
teenage foot soldier at
Your Black Muslim Bakery, which Bailey was
investigating.
At Bailey's funeral, a
mourner held up a sign reading, "Stop Black on Black
Violence." That was the subject of the second
Post story.
"Nearly half the
people murdered in the United States are black,"
declared the opening paragraph, "part of a persistent
pattern in which African Americans are
disproportionately victimized by violent crime,
according to a
new Justice Department study." [Department of
Justice Report: Black Victims of Violent Crime (PDF)]
Among other conclusions
reported by the Post:
 |
Blacks are more
likely than whites or Hispanics to be victims of
crime. |
 |
Blacks are more
likely than any other group to be victims of
"serious violent crime," such as
rape, assault and robbery. |
 |
Blacks were more than
twice as likely as whites to be confronted with a
firearm during a crime. |
"Overall, the new
Justice findings jibe with previous studies," said
the Post. "For example,
a review of FBI data from 2004 by the
Violence Policy Center, a
liberal-leaning group that campaigns for stricter
gun control laws, found that blacks accounted for about
half of the nation's murder victims that year."
"Black victimization
is a real problem, and it's often black on black,"
said
David Harris, [Send him
mail]a law professor at the University of Toledo who
studies crime statistics.
"Often"?
Correction, Harris. As the Post reports and
Justice concedes, in more than nine out of 10 cases,
black victims are murdered by fellow blacks.
Utterly absent from the
Post story and Justice Department stats is
anything about
white victims of crime. Not a word. Do
white folks not count, though they are two-thirds of
the population?
Yet, in
"The Color of Crime: Race, Crime and Justice in
America,"
produced by the "right-leaning"
New Century Foundation in
2005, using the same FBI and Justice surveys,
startling facts emerge:
 |
"Blacks commit
more violent crime against whites than against other
blacks." Forty-five percent of the victims of
violent crime by blacks are white folks, 43 percent
are black, 10 percent are Hispanic. |
 |
Blacks are seven
times as likely as people of other races to commit
murder, eight times more likely to commit robbery
and three times more likely to use a gun in a crime.
|
 |
"Blacks are an
estimated 39 times more likely to commit violent
crime against a white person than vice versa, and
136 times more likely to commit robbery." (If
decent black folks
have trouble hailing a cab, and they do, these
numbers
may help explain it.) |
 |
Black-on-white rape
is 115 times more common than the reverse. |
Even the two most famous
sexual assaults by white men on black women in the
last two decades—the
Tawana Brawley and
Duke rape cases—turned out to be hoaxes.
What do these statistics
tell us? A message the Post will not report. The
real repository of racism in America—manifest in violent
interracial assault, rape and murder—is to be found not
in the white community, but the African-American
community. In almost
all interracial attacks, whites are the
victims, not the victimizers.
Why does the Post
not report such statistics? My guess: Because the stats
would shatter the Post's
cultivated image of America as a land where
white racism is the great lurking malevolent
monster. Stories that conform to the image get play.
Stories that
contradict it are
buried.
But, if the Bush Justice
Department is doing in-depth studies on black victims of
crime and who is responsible, why not one on the
victimization of Americans of all colors and who is
responsible?
Or is that
information we ought not know, and news
not fit to print?
Patrick J. Buchanan needs
no introduction to VDARE.COM
readers; his book
State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and
Conquest of America,
can be ordered from
Amazon.com. |