"The
Stephen King Of Political Science"
[James
Fulford] -
10/06/04
That would be
Samuel Huntington, according to
Jesús Silva Herzog Márquez. What Márquez was saying
was that Huntington was being fantastic in saying that
there is a major
terrorist danger from Mexico, in that WMDs could be
transported across the porous border. But it would
be fairer to compare Huntington to Tom Clancy. King
writes about psychic powers that
don't exist. Clancy writes about terrorist threats
that
do.
[PermaLink] [Top]
[Blog Home]
Majority and Minority in Prison
[James
Fulford] -
10/06/04
Lafayette Bailey, an
ex-convict, [Send him
mail ] and a paralegal with
the D.C. Prisoners' Legal Services Project. , writes
in the Washington Post that
The
Sept. 12 front-page story
"As Lapses in Parole Rose, So Did Killings; District
Felon Charged in Slayings and Rapes" addressed the
tragic result -- but not the root -- of a serious
problem: the surrender of the District's criminal
justice system to the federal government.
In 1997 Congress passed the misnamed
National Capital Revitalization and Self-Government
Improvement Act, which eliminated the D.C. Parole
Board and ordered the closing of the Lorton prison
complex a few years later. By any measure, Lorton was a
mess -- the subject of years of
litigation to remedy problems of medical care,
violence and overcrowding.
Corruption was rampant, as were drug dealing and
other organized criminal activities. I know. I lived
there. [Segregated,
Silenced And Far From Home, October 3, 2004]
The District of Columbia government
is the
closest thing in the United States to a "failed
state" like Haiti. DC prisons were so bad that in
Will, the autobiography of
G. Gordon Liddy, Liddy
says that he could have had people involved
in the Watergate case killed on the street for a carton
of cigarettes.
The problem that Mr. Bailey is
complaining about is an unusual one:
And
although African Americans represent about 60 percent of
the D.C. population, nearly 95 percent of convicted D.C.
felons are African American. They enter a federal penal
system in which African Americans are numerous but still
a minority.
Typically, federal prisons are in rural areas such as
Leavenworth, Kan., and Beaumont, Tex. Nearly two-thirds
of the staff members in these prisons are white.
When
a male D.C. prisoner arrives at a new facility, he is
segregated. During this period of separation, the prison
staff tells D.C. inmates to steer clear of other inmates
from the District "for their own protection." Although
no D.C.-based gangs are known to exist in the federal
prison system, D.C. inmates collectively are called
"D.C. Blacks" by prison officials and treated as though
they were gang members.
The problem is that what
Mr. Bailey is complaining about isn't segregation, it's
integration. He would apparently like to have a prison
system were his minority group was a
majority, as it is in the District, or a
supermajority, as it is in the local prison system.
Instead, the prison system,
being federal, "looks like America."
I'm not sure what can be
done about the prison guards referring to DC blacks as
DC blacks. Perhaps we should issue a fatwa
ordering them to substitute the term "Pennsylvania
Dutch?"
[PermaLink] [Top]
[Blog Home]
American History Standards: "The One Thing"
[James
Fulford] -
10/06/04
On
NBC’s Dateline, Jane Pauley asked
Gary Nash what was the one thing American students
should know about
Washington. The answer: “He was a member of a
slaveholding aristocracy.”
Impressionable Minds: Teaching Politically Correct
History By Tom O’Brien, Crisis Magazine
[PermaLink] [Top]
[Blog Home]
Journalistic Standards: "Quotation marks aren't put in a
text for decoration"
[James
Fulford] -
10/06/04
The story: Canadian conservative
journalist
George Jonas finds himself
misquoted by an
Arab-Canadian grievance monger. The leftish Toronto
Globe and Mail refuses to
print a correction. Jonas
writes
Quotation marks aren't put in a text for decoration.
They're there to tell the reader -- indeed, to warrant
to the reader -- that the portion of the text which they
bracket is a verbatim rendering of words uttered or
written by the source to whom the quote is attributed.
Putting anything but a source's actual words in
quotation marks is a breach of this warranty.
We try very hard to adhere to this
standard at Vdare.Com. I spend a lot of my time adding
hyperlinks to the various pieces that come in, and
making sure that quotations are accurate. Most of the
time, you can click through a link and "read the
whole thing."
Writers for Vdare.Com are kindly
requested to use the cut and paste feature on their
computers.
[Update: I've just spent the
last hour chasing Joseph de Maistre all the way to
France for a quotation in the latest
Chilton
Williamson piece. Aargh. Hope you read
French.]
[PermaLink] [Top]
[Blog Home]
Context Omitted [James
Fulford] -
10/06/04
The Denver Post has
an attack on Michelle Malkin's book. [In
disgrace or in defense? A new book's claim that the
U.S. was justified in interning Japanese Americans in
WWII worsens the pain of their history, Colorado
families say, by Douglas Brown
[send
him
mail] Denver Post September 2, 2004]
The first Colorado
internee interviewed is Mariagnes Medrud
Shortly after Japanese planes bombed
Pearl Harbor, agents from the Federal Bureau of
Investigation plucked her father, a Japanese immigrant
living in Seattle, from his home and placed him in
Department of Justice camps.
He was actually a Japanese
loyalist
-- a teacher of
kendo, (Japanese
swordsmanship,) he refused to swear loyalty to the
US, or to "forswear
any form of allegiance or obedience to the Japanese
emperor, or any other foreign government, power or
organization?"
He and Medrud's mother were
both willing to
renounce their American citizenship and go back to
Japan. But Mariagnes Medrud had decided to stay in
America, so the father and mother changed their minds.
[PermaLink] [Top]
[Blog Home]
Parade Magazine
has a feature on the
Scotch-Irish in America. It's not available
online yet, so you'll have to read about the
redoubtable Scotch-Irish
here or
here. But I'm not sure if Mark Krikorian
approves.
[PermaLink] [Top]
[Blog Home]
Defending Starbucks
[James
Fulford] -
10/06/04
Starbucks is raising its prices
today. A hit piece appears in Slate, accusing
them of
profiteering on caffeine addiction, with the usual
jab at the idea of paying $4.75 for a coffee, comparing
the 50 cent coffee from a street vendor, or a dollar
coffee at a
7-Eleven to a
"java chip Frappuccino."
John Derbyshire wrote that [A]nyone who pays four
dollars for a cup of coffee is in need of a psychiatrist,]
This is
comparing apples to Valencia oranges. Starbucks actually
only charges a dollar thirty-five or so for an actual
coffee.
The fancy drinks are more like a
milkshake or an ice cream sundae, labor and material
intensive, which explains the price. And they
hire Americans who can
speak English, unlike 7-Eleven, which spends
millions lobbying for open borders, and has bad
coffee 24 hours a day.
[PermaLink] [Top]
[Blog Home]