A
reader writes:
I was astonished to hear
Time magazine had a
good cover story (!) on illegal immigration.
I bought a copy from the newsstand—first time since I
was in college.
It seems to me
excellent—except that VDARE.COM was not mentioned. What
happened?
Ha!
Seriously, the Time piece is a superb piece of
journalism and I strongly commend it even to VDARE.COM
readers, to whom much of it will not be news (see
above). And I salute the senior management of Time,
no doubt now deluged with hostile comments, for allowing
it to go forward undefaced by the usual weasel
qualifications. What a difference to when I proposed an
immigration story at Fortune in 1983 (I’ve been
in this a long time) and was greeted with embarrassed
silence!
The
writers, Donald L. Barlett and James B. Steele, are
card-carrying liberals who caused a stir with their
populist
business-bashing in the 1990s. At VDARE.COM, we did
detect their deviationism on immigration some years
ago. Now they have thrown off the mask.
Some
quotes:
I know from my emails (which I always read and try to answer, eventually!) that some sympathizers are dispirited by the long trail of immigration reform defeats in recent years—even though this exactly parallels the 1880-1924 experience. Many others are simply afraid to associate with a cause which has been so thoroughly purged from orthodox establishment media platforms.
But what happens in the major media has an impact and an influence difficult for us net-heads to remember. Time’s courage in being willing to discuss this issue will be a beacon to others.
Maybe John Kerry reads Time. Or, more
likely, some ambitious operative in one or other of this
year’s campaigns.
[PermaLink] [Top]
[Blog Home]
Reason Magazine, which considers
illegal immigration to be a civil right, has already
reacted to the Time story,
Who Left the Door Open, by saying
Go Ahead, Leave the Door Open [Brian Doherty
September 14, 2004]
The problem is that it's everyone's
door. Everyone in America is affected by immigration,
legal and illegal, and lax enforcement is what drives
the illegal side.
And Doherty's idea that it would be
easier to abolish public education, free emergency
medicine, and welfare than to enforce the immigration
laws is Very Silly.
While Americans might be able to do
all that on free-market basis, and still have a stable
society, Mexicans can't or they'd be doing it already.
Izzy Lyman, for example, is capable of
home-schooling her kids, but many immigrants are Mixtec
Indians, who haven't learnt Spanish, although
it's been more than 500 years since Columbus.
[PermaLink] [Top]
[Blog Home]