|
March 23, 2006
Grassroots Conservatives Fed Up With Illegal
Immigration…And The GOP’s Failure To Fix It!!
By Bryanna Bevens
For months now, I have been
prattling on about the GOP and its need to solidify (or
just listen to) its base: the
grassroots conservatives.
After my
latest warning to the Beltway that, seen from here
in southern California, the
natives are restless, I got this telling email from
a Republican official somewhere in
Occupied America:
“I'm
the treasurer of the [deleted] County Republican
Party...I can't wait until fall to try and motivate
Republican volunteers to make GOTV [get out the
vote] phone calls and walk precincts for a guest
worker amnesty....I'll be lucky if I get two or three
when we generally have 1000. In other words, you are so
right on with your comments.
“Keep
up the good work.”
GOPUSA, the Texas-based conservative group, just
released survey results [here]
from an issues poll administered only to
grassroots conservatives.
Now then, some politicos put a lot
of faith in polls and surveys. I think most of them are
pretty much garbage and I haven’t read one that I
considered accurate since
four out of five dentists said they preferred
Trident.
(Yeah…and even then it is important
to note that most kids still chomped Bubble Yum so what
did the results even mean, folks?)
At the beginning of my
career in politics, I paid a lot of attention to
poll and/or survey results because I thought they were
real.
If the opponent’s camp put out a
press release that said 57 percent of voters would vote
against my guy in an election, I thought “Gee, we
need to find out why and fix it!”
But what I learned to do was
read the whole poll…especially the
questions and
how they were worded.
Most pollsters word the questions
as to lead the participants towards a specific answer or
conclusion…meaning a statistic that the pollster
can spin.
More often than not, 57 percent of
voters answered “no” to a question such as this:
Would you vote to re-elect your Assemblyman if he
supported a bill to overturn Roe vs. Wade?
Now we connect the dots:
My candidate is pro-choice and
once-upon-a-time at a fundraiser (or in college while he
was smoking pot that he may not have inhaled) he said
something like “I think Roe vs. Wade was
unconstitutional.”
Well there you have it…my candidate
opposes Roe and 57 percent said they would not
elect such a candidate.
And as a campaign manager, I now
have to deal with a poll being circulated in the media
that says 57 percent of voters don’t like my guy!
Ask questions, people!
If survey results have any
influence on your opinion then read the whole survey!
Yeah…like you would the fine print
on a purchase agreement from a dealership called
Jethro’s Used Cars and Fried Chicken, ok?
(Hmm…funny enough, the two are
oddly similar).
There have been a ton of surveys
and polls conducted by the biggies (Gallup, Zogby and
Co.) on the issue of illegal immigration. But my
instincts tell me I think GOPUSA’s poll, called the
Pulse of Grassroots Conservatives, is on the money.
GOPUSA kept the format simple and
the questions specific, which means the results are most
likely accurate.
Here are a few:
 | (Question 11) What do you
think is the most important issue facing America
today? |
Response:
Government Spending—8 percent
Moral Decline—10 percent
War on Terror—22 percent
The most important issue was set
apart by a wide margin:
Border Security/Immigration—33 percent
Quite often, a question like this
would be presented as “multiple choice” or the
participant would be asked to rank, in order of
importance, eight different issues.
Either way, the “most important
issue” is practically fed to the participant unlike
the GOPUSA poll which allows to voter to choose the
issue for themselves.
After this general question, there
were questions designed to identify the specific areas
of immigration that were problematic for grassroots
conservatives—a very important indicator.
Somewhat serious—9 percent
Not too serious—2 percent
Not a problem—0 percent
Not sure—0 percent
And looky here:
Very serious—88 percent
Here’s another:
Yes—8 percent
Not sure—6 percent
No—86 percent
Yes—2 percent
Not sure—2 percent
No—96 percent
Government spending was first with 49 percent.
Immigration reform was second with 34 percent.
Now that I have stated my reasons
for considering these results more accurate than most,
let me tell you why I think they are more valuable.
The participants of this survey are
grassroots conservatives—not random people who may or
may not vote; and not a hodgepodge of the political
spectrum.
This is the faction of the GOP
responsible for turning out
voters at election time…the people elected officials
should listen to and quite frankly, fear.
Speaking of those scoundrels, how
did our
elected officials fare in the poll?
 | (Question 2) How satisfied
are you with the job the
Senate is doing? |
A mere 26 percent said they were
“somewhat satisfied” while 38 percent said they were
“somewhat unsatisfied” and 34 percent “very
unsatisfied”.
Wow…72 percent are unsatisfied
to some degree.
Only 4 percent were “very
satisfied” while 37 percent said they were
“somewhat satisfied”, 37 percent said they were
“somewhat unsatisfied” and 22 percent said they were
“very unsatisfied”.
Again, 59 percent are
unsatisfied to some degree.
There were many other questions of
interest in this poll. But, in closing, the one I find
most intriguing is about future Presidential candidates:
 | (Question 9) Who is your
choice to be the Republican presidential nominee in
2008? |
Senator
Bill Frist (R-TN) and
Senator John McCain (R-AZ) are two of the most
powerful men in Washington. They have very high profiles
and both have made known their Presidential aspirations.
You would think they would be
favorites…but it seems they are not.
Only 6 percent picked Senator Frist—which
was a better showing than the 4 percent received by
Senator McCain.
Hmm…now that’s interesting.
Grassroots conservatives are very
concerned about illegal immigration and consider the
efforts of Congress thus far to correct the problem a
complete failure.
Senator McCain has been
touting a guest worker scheme with his
pal Ted Kennedy for quite some time—clearly the
grassroots conservatives reject this idea, or they would
rally behind him.
As for Senator Frist, he has yet to
do anything.
Perhaps it is his lack of action
that repels the grassroots conservative.
Senator Frist has said that debate
on immigration reform will resume in the Senate next
week—beginning with his own proposed legislation which
fortunately does not contain guest worker language.
Then again, it doesn’t address the
12 million illegal aliens living in the Unites
States today at all.
And it increases
legal immigration.
Well now…it seems the Senator from
Tennessee/Presidential hopeful still has time to do the
right thing:
Immigration reform begins with
enforcement and
enforcement
is neither amnesty nor a guest worker program.
Senator Frist may have omitted
guest worker language from his bill to avoid debating a
contentious issue
during an election year. But will that be enough to
satisfy the grassroots Republicans?
Hmm…now that’s an inspiring
campaign slogan:
Look what I didn’t do! Vote
for me!
Bryanna Bevens [email
her] is a political consultant and former chief of staff
for a member of the California State Assembly. |