June 15, 2005
Assemblyman Ray Haynes And The California Border Police Initiative
By Bryanna Bevens
People in the immigration reform movement please listen
up and follow the lead of California Assemblyman Ray
Haynes…if you would be so kind.
Side note: By immigration reform movement I am
not referring to those who would
erase our borders and haphazardly extend faux
citizenship to the 15 million illegal aliens who
reside in the United States.
Removing the word "illegal" doesn't
qualify as reform, ok?
Last month, Assemblyman Haynes (R, 66th
Assembly District) introduced ACA 20, the California
Border Police Initiative (CBPI). The legislation itself,
using the wonderful
initiative process we have in California, is
innovative and somewhat radical. It reclaims the
states' historic role in immigration control.
But it is the Assemblyman's approach to selling the plan
that I consider especially worth mentioning.
When I chose to switch to journalism from what I would
call active politics—campaigning with or working
directly for an elected politician—I knew that
immigration reform was a contentious specialty.
Before I delved into the movement and freed myself of
immigration ignorance, even I pictured reform advocates as beer-guzzling,
rifle-brandishing Rednecks…
Men (and, dreadfully,
women) who spent the majority of their time
perched on the tailgates of their
Ford F250's—clad in camouflage garb and night vision
goggles left over from
'Nam—all hoping to capture a few border-creeping
Mexicans.
You know, like the thrill of catching illegal aliens is
a weekend hobby. Some people like to go to the drive-in
and some people like to play Border Patrol dress-up down
in Tucson…different strokes; or something to that
effect.
Admittedly, there is a smattering of these folk. But, by
and large, most
reform advocates look more like the genteel
Sunday school teacher or the Pop from the Mom and
Pop
gas station you would find in any
Small Town, USA.
Assemblyman Haynes recognizes this and directs his
efforts accordingly.
His
California Border Police Initiative is an
uncomplicated bill—the language is easily understood by
even the most unsophisticated constituent.
The measure, if passed by the requisite two-thirds vote,
would amend the state's constitution as follows:
"This measure would declare that the influx of
foreign nationals into California in violation of United States immigration laws constitutes a state of emergency in the state."
And it proposes a response.
"The measure would establish the Division of Homeland Security Assistance, Homeland Security Program, also to be known as the California Border Police…assisting the federal government in enforcing the laws of the United States pertaining to immigration within the borders of the state, pursuant to an agreement entered into between the state and the federal government or as otherwise authorized by the federal government."
The measure does not enlarge the already corpulent
federal Department of Homeland Security. Instead, it
creates an adjunct border law enforcement division much
like the
California Highway Patrol—administered by the state,
not the feds.
A
rather simple solution to a convoluted problem that once
again the average person can grasp—and will therefore
likely support.
Similarly, Assemblyman Haynes counters the media myth of
the obtuse Redneck with his undeniable compassion
towards those targeted by his initiative—the illegal
aliens.
In his brilliant
op-ed for the Los Angeles
Metropolitan News-Enterprise (May 16 2005),
Haynes focuses, rightly so, on America first:
"Talk
to anyone and they will tell you that our national
borders are out of control…The result is
billions of dollars in
free government services paid to those who break our
laws, a flagrant abuse of those laws, and a system that
exploits those who try to enter this country illegally."
But
he thoughtfully acknowledges the ethical quandary in
which many would-be immigrants find themselves.
"My
first observation about the problem is that I understand
the motivation of those who want to come to this
country. If I lived in
abject poverty in a Third World country, I would do
whatever it takes, go wherever I had to, and suffer
whatever indignity I had to in order to make life better
for my family."
Then
Assemblyman Haynes underscores a corollary problem about
which I rarely hear but which really bothers me
personally:
"The
biggest sin of the way this country deals with illegal
immigration today is that it is a system of
exploitation."
Right you are, honorable Mr. Haynes!
For example, look at the recently proposed McKennedy
guest-worker plan.
It would assess up to a $2000 "fine" for each
illegal immigrant when they come forward to apply for a
guest worker visa.
Sidenote: Somehow I think the fine might dissuade them
from coming forward at all, but that's just a simple
girl's guess.
In any event—yikes!
Senators McCain and Kennedy look upon the illegal alien
population and appear to see little but dollar signs.
Their legislation is basically an attempt by the
government class to exploit the poor.
(Sidenote: among other things.
Rosemary Jenks of NumbersUSA emailed me this
comment:
"To say that Senators
McKennedy are doing the bidding of the
cheap labor lobby is to let Congress and the White
House off the hook too easily. President Bush and the
majority in Congress are
willing to sacrifice the
lives of the illegal aliens who die each year during
the
trek north, and the
livelihoods of Americans, all so they can leverage
more campaign contributions or
more votes.")
Finally, what I liked best about Mr. Haynes's op-ed, and
indeed his general approach, is the patently sincere
nature of his demeanor.
Most op-eds submitted by elected officials are
actually composed by staffers who are well-trained
in the art of
spin—putting
tutus on pigs as I like to say. But, unless I am
mistaken, this editorial was a
personal message from
Assemblyman Haynes.
How refreshing.
Many politicians and activist groups have tried to
address the problem of illegal immigration…to no avail.
A
sad truth of politics: The
messenger is usually more important than the
message.
Assemblyman Haynes has proposed a workable solution to
an intractable problem.
But I think it is his posture that will give its passage
more than a fighting chance.
To qualify for the 2006 ballot, the measure will need
roughly 600,000 valid signatures.
The CBPI is supported by Rescue America, the
organization responsible for gathering more than 1.4
million signatures for the
Davis recall in 2003.
For more info contact:
California Border Police. (They don't link to
VDARE.COM, but hey, we're tolerant.)
Bryanna Bevens [email
her] is a political consultant and former chief of staff
for a member of the California State Assembly.