Memo From Mexico, By
Allan Wall
Why Is Mexico’s Voter Registration System Better Than Ours?
Mexico has a better voter registration system
than the United States.
That may come as a shock to those who believe nothing
in Mexico could be superior. Nevertheless, it is true.
My wife is a Mexican citizen. I’ve accompanied her
when she votes. (Being a
non-citizen here, I don’t, of course, vote.) Every
registered Mexican voter has a
Voter ID card, complete with
photograph, fingerprint, and a holographic image to
prevent counterfeiting.
At the
Mexican polling station, there is a book containing
the photograph of every voter in the precinct. This book
is available to the poll workers and observers from
various parties. If there’s a doubt as to
someone’s identity, the poll workers can simply look
up the person’s name and see if the photo matches up.
The Mexican voter’s thumb is smudged with ink. That
way, if he shows up at another polling site to vote,
they know he’s already voted elsewhere. (The ink wears
off after a few days.)
It’s a good system. Sure, Mexico has many problems.
But hey, they solved that one!
Mexico’s
2000 presidential election elected Vicente Fox with
a plurality of the vote. Some were happy, others
weren’t. But there was no significant dispute over who
had won the election. And that was a great
accomplishment.
In contrast, U.S. voter registration is a joke.
Thanks to the
“Motor Voter” regime, not only is it unnecessary for
a voter to
prove citizenship, it is also unnecessary to prove
identity. Registrars have been instructed not to be
inquisitive about applicants’ citizenship - or lack
thereof. It should come as no surprise then, that the
last few years have seen more and more examples of voter
fraud coming to light, including the casting of ballots
by non-citizen voters.
But now–help is on the way–or is it?
I refer to the “Help America Vote Act,” recently
passed by Congress and
signed by President Bush on October 29th,
2002, scheduled to take effect in 2003 and 2004 (if
funds are appropriated). The Help America Vote Act was
opposed by the Hispanic Caucus,
MALDEF and Hillary Clinton (who voted against it).
But it was supported by the NAACP and the Congressional
Black Caucus.
(Some would argue that voter registration should be
the responsibility of states and not the federal
government anyway. It’s a valid point. I hope they are
working in their own states to improve voter
registration standards there.)
In the meantime, what is there about this new federal
law that could possibly improve our voter registration
system?
Well, it does authorize funds for computerized voter
lists. And everyone registering is required to provide a
driver’s license or social security number. And election
officials are actually supposed to try to verify the
numbers.
First-time voters registering by mail have to provide
proof of identity (a photo ID, utility bill, paycheck,
bank statement, or government document with name and
address) when registering or voting.
That’s good as far as it goes. But what about
everybody else? Why not, like Mexico, require a
permament voter ID, with photo, for everybody, all the
time?
Reason: Hispanic pressure groups like
MALDEF and
National Council of La Raza wouldn’t like it. Every
time the suggestion of a photo ID
comes up, some so-called Hispanic activist or
defender
attacks it as discriminatory. In Massachusetts, a
federal judge
struck down a municipal regulation requiring voters
to show an ID before voting on the grounds that it
“unfairly burdened Latino voters.”
Photo ID is inherently discriminatory against
Hispanics? That’s funny - it works here in Mexico, where
almost everybody is Hispanic!
As for “discrimination,” isn’t electoral law
supposed to discriminate between citizens and
non-citizens?
Well, you can’t expect MALDEF and NCLR to care more
about common civic values than the advancement of their
own agenda, now, can you?
Besides, there is a simple solution to the “ID
Discrimination Problem.”
I suggest we follow Mexico’s example, where the
government pays for the photo IDs. Why not? The
government wastes money on so many things already.
What’s better than spending money on improving our voter
registration system? Then maybe someday we could bring
it up to Mexican standards.
I hope the new Republican Congress proves me wrong,
but so far, I don’t see the new law as a panacea. If the
money is appropriated and IF the registration provisions
are enforced, such provisions would be a step in the
right direction.
But what will it really do to prevent non-citizen
voting? Oh, it has a real tough provision for that! The
Help America Vote Act requires the mail-in registration
forms ask the question, “Are you a citizen of
the United States of America?”
It even supplies handy boxes where the applicant can
answer “yes” or “no.”
Don’t worry MALDEF! Senator Christopher Dodd, the
Act’s principal Senate sponsor, reassures you with these
words:
“The checkoff box is a
tool for registrars to use to verify citizenship.
Nothing in the legislation requires a checkoff or
invalidates the form if the box is left blank.”
Yes, the U.S. has a long way to go to get up to
Mexico’s standards.
American citizen Allan
Wall lives in Mexico, but spends a total of about six
weeks a year in the state of Texas, where he drills with
the Texas Army National Guard.
VDARE.COM articles are archived
here; his
FRONTPAGEMAG.COM articles are archived
here. Readers can contact Allan Wall at
allan39@prodigy.net.mx
January 04, 2003