May 26, 2003
Memo From Mexico, By
Allan Wall
Mexico’s Terrified Tancredo-Bashing
On May 22nd, 2003,
Representative
Tom Tancredo held a press conference urging
non-acceptance of the
matricula consular – the ID card issued by the
Mexican government to its citizens illegally in the U.S.
as part of its campaign to get America to amnesty them
all.
The press
conference was reported on that very night on the
national news- in Mexico, on the
TV Azteca network.
Tancredo is
well-known in Mexican media and political circles. They
keep
a sharp eye out for uppity gringos who talk of
restricting immigration.
Since the recent
tragedy in Texas in which 19 illegal aliens
needlessly perished, the Mexican media has been
going on about immigration even more than usual. The
Mexican consensus: a
"migratory accord" with the U.S. is now more
necessary than ever.
Notice, the tragedy
in Texas didn’t provoke Mexican opinion-makers to say “We’ve
got to improve our
economy so poor people won’t have to emigrate.”
Or even “We’ve got to convince people not to do
dangerous things, like have themselves locked up in
trucks not designed for human transport.”
No, their solution,
as usual, is for the United States to
open its border.
Big surprise.
The TV Azteca
report unblushingly reported that the matricula
consular is indeed being used for illegal aliens.
But it emphasized red herrings: the dispute over how
secure the cards are and the fact that Tancredo, at his
press conference, had a poster of a matricula
consular with Vicente Fox’s picture on it. [“Congressman
Stirs Flap With Mexico,” By Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar,
Los Angeles Times
May 22, 2003
TV Azteca
interviewed two U.S. congressmen in Spanish—Xavier
Becerra and Luis Gutierrez. Both were enraged with
Tancredo.
Gutierrez took the opportunity to declare, on
Mexican television, that the Republican Party is
anti-Mexican. So much for
Karl Rove’s pointless
pandering.
Becerra was indignant about the Fox photo—an insult
to the dignity of the Mexican president. (When’s the
last time Becerra defended the honor of the U.S.
president?). [VDARE.COM
note: in
1998, during the Monica Lewinsky scandal, of course!]
Tellingly,
Becerra’s position on the Fox photo was identical to
that of the Mexican government. Thus
Juan José Bremer, Mexico’s ambassador in Washington,
attacked Tancredo for using the Fox photo (Enoja
a México legislador de EU, Reforma May 24th,
2003)
Possibly the Mexican ambassador is worried at a
possible loss of Mexican influence in the U.S. A year
ago he was boasting
about how Mexico’s influence was growing:
“Mexico has achieved
...more influence in the U.S. than we had before. Mexico
wields a greater influence now in many fields, due to
the combination of various factors. We are the
second-largest economic partner and the growth of the
Latino population is achieving opportunities in
politics, economics and culture.”
(Universal
May 20th, 2003 Se insistirá en acuerdo migratorio,
dice Bremer)
But
turnabout is not fair play in Mexico. No public
figure here ever expresses indignation over the constant
attacks on George W. Bush. Despite (or maybe because of)
his pandering, Bush has failed to win the country over.
In the Mexican media, Bush is regularly referred to as a
moron, a corrupt politician who stole the 2000 election,
and a religious fanatic. Oh, and some have likened
Bush to Adolf Hitler. Once again, so much for pandering.
The very next day
after Tancredo’s press conference, Mexican Foreign
Secretary
Luis Ernesto Derbez publicly attacked the Colorado
congressman at a press conference in Cuzco, Peru (!)
where he and Fox were on a state visit. (“
Presentará
Mexico protesta en EU por sátira con imagen de Fox,”
Universal May 23rd, 2003)
At the Cuzco press
conference, Derbez had harsh words for Tancredo,
asserting that he “is the one who has led this
negative battle against our country.”
To the Mexican
elite, you see, for an American elected official to call
for reform of the American laws governing American
immigration policy is “anti-Mexican”.
Derbez promised to
send a diplomatic protest protesting Tom Tancredo’s
“attitude” in utilizing the Fox image.
The foreign
secretary defended the matricula consular—“....Tancredo
is wrong when he says anybody can falsify (the matricula)”
- and defended the card’s security features.
What Derbez is
talking about is the feasibility of counterfeiting the
physical matricula. But this is not the problem
anyway. The problem is U.S. government agencies are
accepting the cards as if they were legal U.S. visas -
which they most assuredly are not. In fact, the
matricula consular is almost a 100% guarantee that
its bearer is an illegal alien. Nevertheless, according
to the latest tally in the Mexican media, 908 police and
sheriff departments, 122 banks, 412 cities and 32
counties in the U.S. now accept the matricula
consular. (Enoja
a México legislador de EU Reforma May 24th,
2003)
In Cuzco, Derbez
made another declaration of support for Mexican illegal
aliens in the U.S.:
“....we will always
defend the rights of our citizens.... the biggest
expense in the
consulates is the defense of the legal rights of
Mexicans abroad.”
Legal rights?
Shouldn’t that be
illegal rights?
Derbez assured his
listeners that a “migratory accord” was still a priority
of the Fox administration. And once again, he referred
to the incremental strategy the Mexican government is
using so successfully. According to Universal,
“He indicated that the
migratory accord has to be accomplished step by step,
through a series of measures, together with discussions
with the U.S. Congress...”
Universal
also reported that Derbez was even bold enough to make
promises to immigrants in the U.S. from other countries
besides Mexico:
“He [Derbez]
pointed out that these actions could benefit migrants
from other countries, ‘because the law (U.S. law) will
not be able to discriminate between migrants’, and the
U.S. government will not say: this is a law only for
Mexican migrants.” [Señaló que estas acciones
podrían beneficiar a migrantes de otros países, "porque
la ley no va a poder discriminar entre migrantes", y el
gobierno estadounidense no va a poder decir: esta es una
ley nada más para migrantes mexicanos.]
That must have gone
over well with Derbez’ Peruvian hosts – who are
also starting their own matricula consular
program!
In fact, Derbez
and Fox were in Peru to attend a summit meeting of 19
Latin American countries, all of which have at least
some emigration to the U.S.
Mexico to Latin
America: come on in, the Americans are helpless!
So there you have
it. A courageous congressman tries to do his job, and he
gets publicly bashed by the Mexican Foreign Minister in
a third country. The White House says nothing.
Tancredo, and the
immigration reform movement in general, is fighting both
the
U.S. and the
Mexican governments.
But the good news
is that the Mexican government is terrified enough to
attack Tancredo, so quickly and violently, in remote
Cuzco.
It is clearly
concerned that the tide may be turning against its
attempt to take control of U.S. immigration policy.
American citizen Allan Wall lives and works legally in
Mexico, where he holds an FM-2 residency and work
permit, but serves six weeks a year with the Texas Army
National Guard, in a unit composed almost entirely of
Americans of Mexican ancestry. His VDARE.COM articles
are archived
here; his
FRONTPAGEMAG.COM articles are archived
here; his
website is
here. Readers
can contact Allan Wall at
allan39@prodigy.net.mx.