Not that
Americans weren't present at the "forum.” There
were a number, including
Henry Cisneros, hate-monger
Jose Angel Gutierrez, MALDEF lawyer
Katherine Culliton, and
open-borders zealot Frank Sharry. All were invited
to speak to those assembled at the get-together.
In other
words, American citizens actively collaborated with the
Mexican elite and its hegemonic ambitions for the United
States of America.
It would
have been useful at the forum to have the input of, say,
a loyal American residing
legally in Mexico.
But, alas, I
guess my invitation was lost in the mail.
Just take a
gander at
the program and you probably know enough already.
The Forum's
list of speakers and panelists included a host of
luminaries, mainstream academics, activists and
politicians. Mexican participants included
Elena Poniatowska, who has spoken openly of
reconquering the U.S. Southwest, and Jorge Bustamante,
who has proposed dual citizenship to
promote Mexican interests.
Enrique
Jackson, president of the Mexican Senate, opened the
conference.
In his
remarks Jackson declared that the forum sought to
eliminate stereotypes and prejudices against Mexicans
who live in the United States. These millions of
Mexicans in the U.S., Jackson assured the audience, are
seen (by Americans) as an internal menace, their rights
are "violated" and "they are victims of abuse
and violence."
Inauguran Foro De Reflexion "Los Mexicanos De Aqui Y De
Alla" Anuncio, April
28th
No reference
by Senator Jackson to violence committed by
Mexican illegal aliens against
American citizens—of which there is all too much.
Of course,
those who murder Americans enjoy the
protection of the Mexican government.
As far as
Mexican illegal aliens’ rights being violated, what can
Jackson be referring to?
The fact
that illegal Mexicans in the U.S. are allowed to move
freely about, engage in public demonstrations, avail
themselves of public health care and education?
That it's
very hard to arrest illegal aliens because many public
officials take their side?
That illegal aliens regularly drive automobiles with
no car insurance, that they are often released when
apprehended, and that some states grant them in-state
tuition and driver's licenses?
That the
entire American political establishment panders to them?
No, I guess
he wasn't referring to that.
By the way,
Jackson said there were 25 million fellow-Mexicans in
the U.S. That’s significant: he’s including American
citizens of Mexican ancestry.
After
Jackson's introduction, the podium was turned over to
American Citizen Henry Cisneros, 4-time mayor of San
Antonio, former Housing and Urban Development Secretary, and
former president of
Univision, U.S.
Cisneros is
also an unabashed booster of what he has
called "the Hispanization of America—It's
already happening and it is inescapable."
Cisneros' discourse was entitled "El
Futuro de las Relaciones entre México y la Comunidad
Mexicano-Americana" [The Future of Relations
Between Mexico and The Mexican-American Community].
Cisneros
spoke of the 25 million people in the U.S. "with
Mexican blood", and he attacked "laws that
separate and destroy
families" by which he means U.S. immigration
law.
Cisneros
says new laws are needed to protect Mexicans.
Once again,
we have a U.S. citizen in Mexico, speaking as a
de facto agent of the Mexican government.
If Cisneros
were a citizen of a nation whose leaders valued its
sovereignty, he might be in real trouble.
Cisneros boasted: "Somos la
realidad de un nuevo mestizaje en Estados Unidos; donde
somos el grupo minoritario más grande y el que crece más
rápido..." [We are the reality of a new
mestizaje in the United States, where we are the largest
minority group and the fastest-growing one].
He went on to
gloat over the Hispanic birth rate being higher than
that of whites, blacks or Asians.
And, of
course, he bragged to the assembled about the "hispanización
de Estados Unidos."
Dificil llegar a un acuerdo migratorio Mexico-EU : Henry
Cisneros April 28th,
2004
MALDEF, The
Ford Foundation’s
contribution to the Treason Lobby, also had its
representative at the conference: attorney/activist
Katherin Culliton.
She
participated in the panel discussion "Los derechos
humanos y laborales de los mexicanos en Estados Unidos"
(Human Rights and Labor Rights of Mexicans in the
United States).
According to
the Notimex report,
"Katherine Culliton, of MALDEF, added that besides
that, more than 100 measures have been taken that
restrict their (Mexican migrants') rights. Because of
that, she stated, the legal situation of migrants and
undocumented [i.e. illegal] Mexicans is worse
than ever." [Katherine
Culliton, del MALDEF, agregó que además se han tomado
mas de 100 medidas que restringen sus derechos. Por todo
ello, aseguró, la situación jurídica en Estados Unidos
de migrantes e indocumentados mexicanos es peor que
nunca.]
The MALDEF
attorney painted a grim picture of a U.S. in which
"[T]here is more
racial profiling by the police, in an
unconstitutional manner, against the Latin American
migrants, and those who look Latino are stopped
and required to show documents…We are speaking of new
tendencies and cases of anti-immigrant and anti-Latino
discrimination."
Wow! "New
tendencies"—not just your old garden variety
discrimination!
And this new
discrimination allegedly extends to all levels of
government! Government policies, presumably those of
Panderer-in -Chief George W. Bush "incluye la
xenofobia y las decisiones polìticas y judiciales."
[include xenophobia in political and legal
decisions].
The solution
, according to Culliton: reform (i.e., liberalization)
of U.S. migratory law… of course. Funny how they always
arrive at that conclusion![
Aumenta discriminacion Contra
Migrantes
April 29th, 2004]
The Mexico
City jamboree was also attended by two former Mexican
ambassadors to the United States: Jesús Reyes Heroles
and Jesús Silva Herzog.
That is
entirely fitting, given that the Mexican
diplomatic corps is on the
frontline of the Mexican reconquista of the
U.S..
In other
words, these guys
know whereof they speak.
Silva
Herzog, ambassador to the U.S. 1995-1997, instructed
those in attendance that the goal for U.S. immigration
policy is "orderly and legal migration" and that
immigration would continue for decades.
Well, that's
certainly Mexico’s
intention, isn't it?
Necesario Trabajar Para Que Haya Una Migracion Ordenada
y Legal April 29th,
2004
Herzog also complained about
the discrimination Mexicans suffer in the U.S.. And he
said the Bush Betrayal—the President’s extraordinary
open-borders proposal in January—was insufficient.
But Herzog
was quite truthful when he called Mexican emigration
"a
safety valve from our incapacity to grow and offer
more job opportunities." "una
válvula de escape a nuestra incapacidad de crecer y de
ofrecer mayores oportunidades de empleo".
Silva Herzog
made these comments in a panel discussion which also
included Mexican-American José Angel Gutierrez of the
University of Texas, Arlington.
That’s
interesting. Gutierrez is the founder of the La Raza
Unida Party. He has
said that "we have got to eliminate the gringo,
and what I mean by that is if the worst comes to the
worst, we have got to kill him." (More
Gutierrez quotes.)
But is
anybody questioning the Mexican Senate for including
this rabid hate-monger in its officially sponsored-
conference?
Of course
not.
The other
former Mexican ambassador, Jesús Reyes Heroles gloated
over Latinos becoming the
biggest minority in the U.S., due principally to
migration, but also to the fact that whites and blacks
are multiplying at a slower rate.
Reyes
Heroles also explained the demographic distribution:
"Mexicans are concentrated geographically in a few
regions. Eighty-four percent of all Mexicans residing in
the United States are located in five states:
California, Texas, Arizona, Illinois and New York."
"Los mexicanos se concentran geográficamente en pocas
regiones. El 84 por ciento del total
de los mexicanos radicados en Estados Unidos se ubica en
cinco estados: California, Texas, Arizona, Illinois y
Nueva York."
(As Steve
Sailer has pointed out, this actually reduces their
much-exaggerated political clout).
Fellow
panelist Raúl Hinojosa, of UCLA, asserted that "el
mexicano de aquí y de allá" [the Mexican of
Mexico and the United States] had the potential to
transform the future of the U.S.A. and the bilateral
relationship.
Hmm, sounds
like
Huntington... But, in a classic of Orwellian
double-think, Hinojosa was quick to deny this:
"The Mexican of There [the United States] is
not even close to what Professor Huntington of Harvard
attempts to believe, that he is an imminent danger. In
any given moment he can fly from Boston to California to
see the future."
In reality,
Huntington already has seen the likely future— that is
if present trends continue and if Americans don't wake
up.
The
star-studded host of luminaries at the "Foro" was
joined at its closing ceremony by none other than
Mexican Foreign Minister Luis Ernesto Derbez, recently
returned from his tour of
Los Angeles, Alta California. In fact, Derbez gave
the closing address.
The
highly-competent Mexican Foreign Minister was at the top
of his game. He presented to the assembled Mexicans and
American fifth-columnists a coherent vision of Mexican
hegemony over the U.S.A.
On this
question, you certainly can't accuse Mexico's leaders of
having muddled vision—or hiding it. (Unless Professor
Huntington
dares to notice.)
Derbez told
them that
"as you all know, the Mexican communities abroad are a
matter of the first priority for the government of
Vicente Fox. The Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores,
through 45 consulates in the United States and the
Instituto de los Mexicanos en el Exterior, confers the
highest priority to the protection of our fellow
Mexicans and the development of programs that contribute
to raise their standard of living."
That's
raising the standard of living of Mexicans in the
U.S.—not in Mexico.
Derbez
continued
"In this context, the implementation of this forum
testifies to the broad consensus that exists in Mexico
in regard to the subject of immigration, particularly
regarding the necessity of defending the rights of
workers and their families."
That's
"defending" them in the U.S.—not in Mexico.
Later,
Derbez really got into the heart of Mexico's strategy:
"For Mexico, the rapprochement with the populations of
Mexican origin residing beyond our borders is a
fundamental issue. Today, over 24 million persons of
Mexican ancestry live in the United States. This figure
includes 9% of the total of residents in that country
and more than half that of the Hispanic population. In
the states of Texas and California alone reside 15.7
million persons of Mexican origin, which represents 28%
of the population of both states.”
The Mexican
government, you see, is paying close attention to these
dramatic demographic changes in the U.S..
Derbez
continued....
" During recent years, American society has been
Mexicanized. The number of Mexican immigrants has
increased 13-fold from 1970 to 2000. The impact of this
change in the social fabric of the United States will be
reflected, above all, among the children and
grandchildren of the millions of Mexicans that migrated
northward during the past 30 years. By the middle of
this century, one of every five Americans will be of
Mexican ancestry. It will depend upon us to create the
favorable conditions so that the children and
grandchildren of our migrants maintain their links with
the country of their ancestors."
Non-assimilation, in other words.
Exactly what
Huntington said.
Derbez
promoted the Mexican government's "Instituto de los
Mexicanos en el Exterior" and its "Consejo
Consultivo:"
"...we want the Council to serve to give voice to the
communities abroad, so that they can participate in the
process of the formulation of public policies directed
toward them. We know that the best manner of
contributing to the well-being of this population is
strengthening its autonomous labors of organization,
encouraging its interchange of points of view among its
leaderships, and bringing about the identification of a
shared agenda, around which Mexicans of both sides of
the border can join together."
Can he make
it any clearer?
A large
Mexican-American population residing in the United
States, but owing its
civic allegiance to Mexico.
That's the
goal of the Mexican government.
Many
Americans ridicule the idea that Mexico could be a
threat to the United States.
I guess
these people just don't take Mexico seriously.
As the
Mexico City forum illustrates, Mexico's elite and their
American collaborators know exactly what they want. And
they`re actively engaging in obtaining it.
Does the
Bush Administration agree?
And what
about the American people?
American citizen Allan Wall lives and works legally in
Mexico, where he holds an FM-2 residency and work
permit, but serves six weeks a year with the Texas Army
National Guard, in a unit composed almost entirely of
Americans of Mexican ancestry. His VDARE.COM articles
are archived
here; his
FRONTPAGEMAG.COM articles are archived
here; his
website is
here. Readers
can contact Allan Wall at
allan39@prodigy.net.mx.
