Show your support by purchasing VDARE.com merchandise. 
VDARE.com's Amazon connection has been restored! Remember to enter Amazon via the VDARE.com link and we get a commission on any purchases you make—at no cost to you!
Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele and Al Sharpton, whom he recently called a "friend" and a "strong leader", have found new common ground: opposing immigration enforcement.
Sharpton
called the
Steele was more circumspect—slightly. He told a group of Hispanic lawmakers in a private meeting:
"As someone who
has been the victim of
racial profiling, there
must be a necessary
sensitivity to that issue. And
understanding that any perception of racism in law
becomes racism in fact for the individual who is the
subject of that law. And so that is an important aspect
of this law as well that I know our leadership is very,
very sensitive to."
While opposing immigration law enforcement, Steele called for a "comprehensive policy" on immigration that "takes in mind first and foremost the family, that recognizes that this is not a nameless composition." Hmm, I wonder what that means. [Steele talks immigration policy in meeting with Hispanic activists, Peter Hamby, CNN Political Ticker, April 26, 2010]
Steele spoke at Al Sharpton's National Action Network
conference earlier this month.
The RNC was listed as a sponsor, which
(When the National Legal and Policy Center
highlighted
this, RNC spokesman Doug Heye told
National Review
Online, "The
committee did no such thing. Chairman Steele was asked
to speak and accepted—as former speaker Gingrich did
last year—and a committee staffer participated in a
roundtable. The RNC did not contribute any monies to the
conference."
I find this believable as Sharpton understands that
having the RNC listed as a sponsor gives him more
credibility as a national leader rather than the
unscrupulous race hustler that he is.
[Did
the RNC Pay Money to Al Sharpton's National Action
Network,
Kathryn Jean Lopez,
National Review
Online, April 19, 2010])
Steele justified his appearance as means for doing
outreach to African Americans, which he claimed was his
main goal upon
assuming chairmanship.
But if Steele really cared about outreach, restricting immigration would be far a better way to attract black voters than giving the GOP an "off the hook…hip hop makeover." According to a February 2010 Center for Immigration Studies/Zogby poll, 68% of black voters said we had too much immigration, and just 4% said we did not have enough. When asked if they supported "granting legal status and a pathway to citizenship" or "enforcing the law and causing them to go home over time" 50% supported enforcement while only 30% supported legalization. [An Examination of Minority Voters' Views on Immigration, Steven A. Camarota, Center for Immigration Studies, February 2010]
But just like Sharpton, Michael Steele
is more concerned about whining about racism than taking
concrete steps to help African Americans.
Instead of talking about the
negative effects immigration poses to the black
community,
Steele repeated the usual canards about
racial disparities.
There is no transcript of his talk, but Tucker
Carlson's new news site the
Daily Caller
gave a detailed summary,
"Civil rights,
equality on paper,
the familiar story. But, of course, dreams do not
reflect reality. When you were growing up, he asks the
audience, did the American Dream feel like part of you,
like it was your birthright? For many it did, he says.
For many more it did not, 'and as you and I know, that
dream has often been delayed and sometimes denied—and
until our children are born thinking the American dream
is their birthright, it will remain that way.' Moreover,
he adds, it will remain that way until the children have
access to fair and affordable housing, access to
credit and capital, and
voting machines that
work. ('You didn't think I knew about that, huh')…
"By god, it could
be Reverend Al up there at this point—and then Steele
commits outright GOP treason and quotes, at length, from
a litany of depressing statistics about the
racial achievement gap—first
delivered, he reveals at the end, on June 11, 1963, by
John F. Kennedy himself. '[Radio
and Television Report to the American People on Civil
Rights,
Video]Not much has changed,' he concludes, dropping the words slow and hard
as an axe-head, 'In forty. Seven. Years.' Don't
even ask about his follow-up statement on pervasive
Justice Department bias."
In addition, Steele made jokes insulting to both the
Republican Party ("Now,
I don't know if any of you have ever had to
turn an elephant,
but the end you have to start with is not necessarily
the best place to start") and Thomas Jefferson
("Thomas Jefferson must be
saying to himself, 'How did a brother wind up in my
office? [referring to the Maryland Lt. Governor's
office where
The next week Steele spoke at DePaul University on April 20. When asked why African Americans should vote Republican, he responded "You really don't have a reason to, to be honest—we haven't done a very good job of really giving you one. True? True."
Steele bemoaned,
"We have lost
sight of the historic, integral link between the party
and African-Americans, This party was co-founded by
blacks, among them
Frederick
Douglass.
The Republican Party had a hand in forming the NAACP,
and yet we have mistreated that relationship. People
don't walk away from parties, their parties walk away
from them.
For the last
40-plus years we had a 'Southern Strategy' that
alienated many minority voters by focusing on the white
male vote in the South. Well, guess what happened in
1992, folks,
'Bubba' went back home to the Democratic Party and voted for Bill Clinton."
[African-Americans
not given good reason to vote GOP,
by Abdon M. Pallasch, Chicago Sun Times, April 20, 2010]
Almost every single word here is factually incorrect.
Frederick Douglass had no role in founding the
Republican Party.
One of the founders of the NAACP was a
Republican, but the rest were Democrats or socialists.
As for the Republican Party
"walking away"
from blacks, the policies they pursued under Nixon,
Reagan, and Bush were certainly more liberal than the
views of Lincoln or Eisenhower.
(Affirmative
Action began under Nixon,
after all). They just were not as radical as the
Democrats.
As for "Bubba",
white men gave more votes to George Bush than Clinton in
every Southern state but his home state of Arkansas.
It was largely due to
Ross
Perot
that Clinton had the edge in a grand total of four of
the eleven states of the Confederacy.
But I digress.
If
Steele's open borders agenda, insults to his own party,
and complaints about
disparate racial impact
are not enough, Steele has been incompetent in his
running of the RNC.
The most publicized example: the expenditure of
$2,000 in a bondage themed strip club.
But rather
than taking responsibility for these missteps, Steele
blamed his problems on his race, simultaneously
undercutting opposition to Obama.
When George Stephanopoulos asked him whether
"as an African
American, you have a slimmer margin for error than
another chairman would", Steele replied,
"The honest
answer is yes.
It just is. Barack Obama has a slimmer margin."
[New
Troubles for RNC Chair Michael Steele?,
by Jonathan Karl and Huma Khan, ABC Good Morning
America, April 6, 2010]
Last year,
when Roland Martin claimed
"White
Republicans have been afraid of black folks," Steele
agreed, "You're
absolutely right.
I've been in the room and they've been scared of
me. [Michael
Steele: Some white GOP 'scared of me',
Andy Barr, Politico, November 9, 2009]
Of course, nobody (except for maybe
Michael Steele) has any illusions but that his race is
the main reason why he became RNC chairman to begin
with. Ever
eager to pander, most Republicans who supported him
thought that his race would help attract minorities into
the party and/or deflect accusations of racism from the
party, especially when opposing a black president.
Needless to say, Steele has completely failed at
attracting blacks to the GOP.
According
Washington Post-ABC News polls issued after Steele
became the RNC's first black chairman, 78% of blacks had
negative opinion of the party, the same as it had been
two years earlier.
In 2008, 28% of all non whites had favorable
opinions of the GOP. That number is down to 23% since
Steele took office.
[Steele
falling behind on pledge to woo more minority voters to
GOP,
Perry Bacon Jr. and Krissah Thompson, Washington Post,
April 14, 2010]
But what is truly amazing is that
instead, of mitigating accusations of Republican racism,
Michael Steele is stating publicly that he (and Barack
Obama!) are victims of it.
Most Republicans still at least
nominally oppose race preferences. So their tendency to
practice Affirmative Action by promoting grossly
under-qualified blacks to leadership positions is
hypocritical, as well as irritating.
That said, most of these blacks at
least do not bite the Republican hand that feeds them.
Sometimes they are strong voices for the conservative
side.
Thus there is no way that Clarence Thomas would have
been nominated for the Supreme Court after only one year
on the Appeals Court were it not for his race—anymore
than Obama could have been nominated for President
without even finishing his first Senate term.
However, with a few
exceptions
such as
Virginia vs. Black,
Thomas has proved himself to be one of the strongest
opponents of anti-white judicial activism in the Court.
I may not like the fact that the GOP made him an
affirmative action hire, but all things being equal, I'm
glad he's there.
In contrast, GOP Chairman Michael Steele is acting like
an underqualified student who is
admitted into college because of Affirmative Action,
gets the school to fund his various pro-black causes,
and then accuses them of racism when he receives poor
grades.
We've all heard that
Diversity Is Strength.
But the
GOP
Establishment
actually believed it.
"Washington Watcher" [email
him] is an anonymous source Inside The
Beltway.