Show your support by purchasing VDARE.com merchandise. 
VDARE.com's Amazon connection has been restored! Remember to enter Amazon via the VDARE.com link and we get a commission on any purchases you make—at no cost to you!
As
the
U.S. Open goes
into its final week end, it pains me to say that I find
the whole event a crashing bore.
The last American male,
John Isner, got
knocked out on Monday. The Williams sisters, the
greatest sibling athletes in sports' history, and
Georgia teenager Melanie Oudin, are terrific stories but
not compelling enough to carry a two-week event.
I've rooted for
Serena and Venus
since they first came onto the tennis scene. Suddenly
and unexpectedly, I find their on-court grunting and
fist pumping as well as their off-court alter egos as
designers and actors tedious.
As for Oudin,
dispatched in the quarterfinals, I'd like her more if I
heard less about her.
Tennis and I go back years. I grew up in Los Angeles
playing on the
Beverly Hills High School
cement courts. When my family moved to
Puerto Rico, I
took my first professional lesson from
Welby Van Horn
who once lost in
the U.S. Open finals but also at one point in his career
beat one of the best tennis players who ever lived
Bill Tilden, 6-0,
6-2, 6-1. [Anyone
Too Young For Tennis? by Carleton Mitchell,
Sports Illustrated, June 12, 1961]
During my Pitt undergraduate years,
I played varsity tennis
on one of the weakest teams in organized college
athletics.
I've watched
in person great U.S. Open matches dating from the 1970s
when the West Side Tennis Club in Forest Hills hosted a
draw of thirty-two players and the matches were on
grass.
I'm not pleased that the tournament is so tedious. I'm
retired, have a flat screen television and plenty of
time on my hands to watch the nonstop coverage on the
Tennis Channel and
ESPN.
Why has it all
gone so wrong?
First, the
color commentary is overbearing and rarely, except for
John McEnroe, provides any insight into tennis strategy.
As a lifelong player whose skills peaked years ago, I
wouldn't mind picking up a few tips about proper
execution.
On the women's
side, the trio of Mary Carillo, Mary Jo Fernandez and
Pam Shriver emphasize to excess players' injury history
and how it limits their mobility, even though the player
in question is darting around the court like a rabbit.
As
old sports axiom goes, if you're playing,
you're not injured.
Alternatively, if you're injured, don't play.
Second, I don't understand why no one comes into the
net. What's the point of having a 140 MPH serve like
Andy Roddick if you don't come in behind it
occasionally? If nothing else, a net rush would break up
the tedium of watching the competitors slug it out
endlessly from the base line. As legend
Pancho Gonzales
might have observed, mixing up the style of play is an
important strategic element.
Third, I can't relate to
the players. I'm
sure this is linked to my vigorous resistance to
globalism. But
seriously, as gifted as they all are, I can readily
identify only the handful of consistent winners like
Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal.
I'm comforted to know that
Serena has the
same problem. Recently, commenting on all the Russian
women on the tour, Williams wrote on her Twitter page
that
she doesn't "really recognize anyone," and is so swamped
by Eastern bloc-sounding names that she has started
considering herself Russian.
Williams said:
"Sometimes I think I'm from Russia, too. I feel like,
you know, OK, all these new-ovas. I don't know anyone. I
don't really recognize anyone. You know, that's just how
it is. I think my name must be Williams-ova."
[Serena
'Williamsova' Doesn't Recognize Flood of New Russian
Ovas,"
ThaiIndianNews, June 23, 2009]
Fourth, I miss the charisma of the players from earlier
generations. Nadal, Federer and the Williams sisters may
be better than McEnroe, Jimmy Connors,
Chris Evert and
Evonne Goolagong but they're not as colorful.
To the extent
possible, I avoid writing about how much better things
were decades ago since it suggests that I am
irretrievably locked in a time warp. That indeed may be
the case, since plenty of evidence exists to that
effect.
Yet here I am
throwing out obscure names like Van Horn from
seventy-five years ago to make my point.
I'll tune in to the Sunday final match but by using my
NBA approach
(last two minutes only) and limit my viewing to the
final set. I can't justify spending nearly four hours to
watch the players slug it out from the baseline.
After all, I
can always watch paint dry.
Joe Guzzardi [email him] is a California native who recently fled the state because of over-immigration, over-population and a rapidly deteriorating quality of life. He has moved to Pittsburgh, PA where the air is clean and the growth rate stable. A long-time instructor in English at the Lodi Adult School, Guzzardi has been writing a weekly column since 1988. It currently appears in the Lodi News-Sentinel.