Show your support by purchasing VDARE.com merchandise. 
VDARE.com's Amazon connection has been restored! Remember to enter Amazon via the VDARE.com link and we get a commission on any purchases you make—at no cost to you!
I'm glad to read that the long-standing debate in Lodi
about preserving a greenbelt is alive and well. [Local
Weigh in on Greenbelt, Lodi News-Sentinel,
October 24, 2009]
My
position on the importance of
saving what we can of Lodi, while we can hasn't
changed since I first wrote about it
in 2003.
Inevitably,
however, the acreage between Stockton and Lodi will be
paved over because of population increases.
The dispute
about whether to create and sustain a greenbelt should
be addressed in two parts.
Ultimately as long as population grows, the greenbelt
will cease to exist. People have to live someplace. Once
they put down housing roots, they'll need
schools,
hospitals and
roads.
The argument then becomes whether to
construct tract housing
in the suburbs or high rise buildings
within the city limits.
Once the
houses are built, agricultural land becomes cement,
highways
have to be upgraded
and traffic increases.
Building in
the city creates other equally undesirable consequences.
Noise, crime and stress levels rise.
Soon
lovable, livable Lodi
is drastically altered and becomes neither
lovable nor livable.
For three decades I have advocated for restricting
population by
securing our border
with Mexico,
cutting legal immigration, and promoting sensible
family planning.
And while some
readers accuse me of ranting against all hope for
population stability, at least three powerful people
have recently joined the cause.
According to reports, billionaires
Bill Gates
and
Warren Buffett
met privately at the Manhattan home of
Nobel laureate biologist Sir Paul Nurse,
president of Rockefeller University. [Billionaire
Club in Bid to Curb Overpopulation,
by John Harlow, London Times, May 9, 2009]
On their agenda were the world's worst looming problems
like global warming, poverty,
Muslim terrorism and
depleted oil reserves. They concluded that one evil
overrides all others—overpopulation.
Gates, Buffet and Nurse need to spread their message
among the unenlightened. If they don't, then California
is
on its way
to being the equal to China.
According to recent
U.S. Census Bureau
estimates,
by 2030 California's population density will equal
China's. Unlike the United States, however, thirty years
ago China
came to terms
with its
overpopulation
when it instituted a one child per family policy.
In
1850, California's first year of statehood, it had only
92,000 residents. Today, that number has risen to more
than 38 million. By 2030, projections put the number at
50 million.
In a state that claims environmental sensitivity and as
proof points to having more
hybrid vehicles
than all the other 49 combined, California nevertheless
leads in population explosion. Roughly 500,000 residents
have been added annually for more than a decade.
With all the emphasis on
going green,
limiting population is the ultimate green solution.
Right now is a great time to raise awareness.
California's statewide
recession
has
slowed immigration
and ended, at least temporarily, new housing
development. That's a good start.
Everyone could play a role in promoting smaller family
size, a harder sell than it should be.
Politicians and the media treat population as if the
subject is a minefield.
Given the consequences
of ignoring it, however, their neglect is unforgivable.
In today's tight economy, few can afford to rear more
than two children. To encourage replacement level only
families,
tax credits
for a third or more child should be eliminated. Anyone
who wants more kids should have to pay for them out of
their own pocket.
Beginning in primary school, age-appropriate
sex education
must be provided to all children and adults. For
administrators who don't want to involve the
controversial Planned Parenthood, they can invite the
California Office of Family
Planning
to classrooms.
Insurance plans should include coverage for all FDA
approved contraceptive methods.
All these solutions require outside intervention. But as
with so many other social problems, the best place to
start is at home.
Parents, relatives and mature adult role models should
not hesitate to reinforce to teenagers that most are
simply not ready emotionally and financially to shoulder
the burden of child rearing.
Here's a few simple words I recommend to get the
overpopulation message across: "You can't handle it."
Joe Guzzardi [email him] is a California native who recently fled the state because of over-immigration, over-population and a rapidly deteriorating quality of life. He has moved to Pittsburgh, PA where the air is clean and the growth rate stable. A long-time instructor in English at the Lodi Adult School, Guzzardi has been writing a weekly column since 1988. It currently appears in the Lodi News-Sentinel.