Show your support by purchasing VDARE.com merchandise. 
VDARE.com's Amazon connection has been restored! Remember to enter Amazon via the VDARE.com link and we get a commission on any purchases you make—at no cost to you!
Had he not proven incompetent to detonate his lap bomb,
Umar Farouk Abdulmullatab
would have carried off an air massacre to rival
Lockerbie.
We would all have ended Christmas day watching TV
footage of 300 mangled bodies being picked up around
Detroit.
The system breakdown was total. His father had reported
to the U.S. embassy that Umar had gone extremist,
disowned his family and vanished in Yemen. Though the
23-year-old Nigerian had been put on a U.S. terrorist
watch list and denied a visa to enter Britain, his U.S.
visa was not revoked.
Though he had been in Yemen for months, bought his plane
ticket in cash and boarded without luggage, he was
neither red-flagged nor screened or body-searched.
We were spared the horrible consequences of our
incompetence, only because of his incompetence. The
episode raises questions not only about airline
security, but about how we are fighting the real war we
are in.
Defeating al-Qaida calls for ways and means different
from dealing with
domestic crime families
like the Gottis or Gambinos.
Organized crime is the province of police and
prosecutors.
Crime bosses are read their rights and granted access to
a lawyer. They come into court in suits to undergo a
fair and equal contest to ascertain guilt or innocence.
If acquitted, they walk free.
This 23-year-old Nigerian is an enemy combatant whose
way of war is mass murder. Under the rules of war, he
may be shot. The immediate imperative was not to read
him his Miranda rights or to phone
Ron Kuby.
It was to subject Abdulmullatab to intense and hostile
interrogation so that U.S. forces can quickly find, fix,
attack and kill his comrades and camp followers.
Unlike the war on crime, or the war on drugs, this is
not a metaphorical war. There is no presumption of
innocence, rather a presumption that Umar is a terrorist
and did not act alone.
The questions he should have been asked as soon as he
was pulled off the plane and hauled to a prison hospital
are these:
Who taught you to detonate a bomb? Who sewed the
underwear in which you concealed the components? Who was
with you in Yemen? What are the names of those you
trained with? Who helped you get on that plane? Who did
you stay with on your visits to the U.S.? Who gave you
cash? Who paid your bills? Where is your computer? And
if you want pain medicine for those burns, you will tell
us.
A question arises after the lackadaisical way the
administration first dealt with this potential horror.
Are we governed by serious people? A second question is
raised by the ideological journey of this 23-year-old
from devout Muslim to extremist to terrorist, and by his
sojourn from Nigeria to London to Yemen to America.
In Omar Bradley's comment on Korea, are we fighting the
wrong war, in the wrong place, at the wrong time, with
the wrong enemy?
Obama just ordered 30,000 more troops into Afghanistan.
Yet, even if Gens. David Petraeus and Stanley McChrystal
pull it off and pacify Kandahar, how does that protect
the American homeland from suicide bombers hell-bent on
blowing up airliners?
How does turning the tide in Afghanistan stop radical
Muslim youth in Africa or Arabia from being trained to
board planes with bombs and blow them up over the
Atlantic? How do 130,000 U.S. soldiers in Iraq make us
more safe from an al-Qaida that has moved into
Waziristan, Baluchistan, Yemen, Somalia and North
Africa?
The
Sept. 11 massacre
may have been decided upon in Afghanistan. But the
perpetrators were Saudis and Egyptians who plotted,
planned and trained in
Germany,
Boston, Delray Beach and
Northern Virginia.
How has occupying two nations at a cost of 5,000 dead,
35,000 wounded and a trillion dollars made us safer from
an enemy that more resembles the Apache of Geronimo than
the panzers of Rommel?
If protection of the homeland against another Sept. 11
is the goal of this war, how relevant to that goal is
the building of clinics and schools in Kabul and keeping
the Taliban at bay in Helmand?
Are we fighting other people's wars, rather than our own
war?
We Americans are today widely hated in the Arab and
Islamic world by scores of millions, out of whom
al-Qaida need but recruit a few hundred suicide bombers
to wreak havoc on our country.
Does having 200,000 U.S. troops in their part of the
world, fighting and killing Muslims, make our country
more secure than defending our borders, keeping radicals
out, running al-Qaida down, and tracking and killing
them where they are?
To win the war we are in, we have to fight the war we
are in, not the war we prefer to fight because no one
else is so good at it.
COPYRIGHT CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.
Patrick J. Buchanan
needs
no introduction to
VDARE.COM readers; his book State
of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and
Conquest of America, can
be ordered from Amazon.com. His latest book
is Churchill,
Hitler, and "The Unnecessary War": How
Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost
the World,
reviewed
here by
Paul Craig Roberts.