Swept Away – North Of The Border

Canadian journalist

Gwynne Dyer
recently said in a speech at a local
high school that post-1960`s immigration “saved” Canada

Quebec separation
. [Immigration
given credit for saving national unity,
Joe Matyas, London [Ontario] Free Press
May 28, 2003]

Why did Dyer think it saved Canada?
Did the

“Canadian mosaic,”
a concept touted by

Canadian multiculturalists
as the opposite of the
perfidious American

melting pot,
cause separatist Quebecois to become
contented and loyal subjects of the Queen?

Not at all. The immigrants simply
outvoted them!

it not for the new Canadians who voted 90 per cent for
Canada in the close 1995 Quebec referendum, Canada would
have split into two countries, said Dyer.”

Canada has changed in the past
thirty-odd years, as result of

government policy
more or less along the lines of
the U.S. Immigration act of 1965.

“In 36
years, Canada has been transformed from a country that
was 98 per cent white European and two per cent native
into a reflection of the entire globe, said Dyer, a
freelance journalist whose column is syndicated in 175
papers in 45 countries.”

Dyer attributes the change in
Canada`s ethnic balance to a decision made by one man:
Canada`s late Prime Minister,

Pierre Elliott Trudeau.

`strongly suspects` Trudeau made a conscious decision to
do this to ease tensions between the English and French,
who he compared to `two scorpions in a bottle.`”

Dyer thinks this is a good thing. I
think it`s a bad thing. Either way, it was a secret
thing. No one ever put it to a vote. I suspect most
Canadians, like most Americans, think it just happened,
like winter snowfalls or summer humidity.

Prime Minister Trudeau didn`t stand
up in Canada`s House of Commons and say “Quebec won`t be
able to separate because I will import foreigners to
outvote you.” He didn`t say that he was going to change
Canada from a basically bicultural (English and French)
country to a country where 20 percent of the inhabitants
had been born elsewhere.

” `He
believed in Canadian unity,` said Dyer. `I think he
social engineered us into change and, if so, he`s the
man who saved this country. We`re in the midst of one of
the largest social experiments ever and it`s working.`”

In fact, of course, whether it`s
working or not is

– although rarely in Canada`s intensely
politically-correct media. And the same thing is

in the United States. See

“Swept Away”
by Peter Brimelow and Ed Rubenstein, or
their 1997 article,

“Electing a New People,”
detailing how immigration
can destroy the Republican Party.

The title of the 1997 article is
from a poem Bertolt Brecht

after the

East German uprisings
of 1953:


After the uprising of the 17th June

The Secretary of the Writers Union

Had leaflets distributed in the Stalinallee

Stating that the people

Had forfeited the confidence of the government

And could win it back only

By redoubled efforts. Would it not be easier

In that case for the government

To dissolve the people

And elect another?

Apparently the late Prime Minister
Trudeau felt that way.

It`s not unlikely that the
Democrats feel the same way.

The obvious question is this: why
are the

letting them get away with it?