[Helpful VDARE note: "Rotten Boroughs" were districts returning members to the British House of Commons, prior to the democratic Great Reform Act of 1833, despite having few or even no inhabitants. As a practical matter, they were in the gift of local magnates. Well, guess what…]
Christopher Hitchens describes the Senate (in No One Left To Lie To):
“Owing in part to Article V of the Constitution, it is impossible to amend the provision that grants two senators to each state of the Union, regardless of population. Thus – in an arrangement aptly described by Daniel Lazare as one of “rotten boroughs” – unpopulous white and rural states such as Montana and Wyoming have the same representations as do vast and all-American and ethnically diverse state like New York and California.”
When Hitchens says “all-American”, I think he must mean un-American.
Originally the term all-American meant “From every state in the Union”, and was applied to the W.W.I 82nd Division to differentiate it from locally recruited divisions. It`s not logically possible for a state to be all-American, but if you redefine “all-American” to mean, say, “vibrant” or “diverse”, then it`s obvious Wyoming doesn`t qualify.
Of course, the two senators and three electoral votes possessed by Wyoming are part of the genius of the American Constitutional compromise, with its Representatives and Senators.
A recent caller to Rush Limbaugh noted that the Electoral College meant that the “heartland had a right to be heard.” Which it does, especially if you consider that there`s nothing particularly morally superior about having superior numbers.
In THE PATRIOT GAME: Canada and the Canadian Question Revisited, Peter Brimelow wrote about the problems of a country where elections are based on straight numbers, with no Senators to defend the outlying regions.
Then he left Canada!
February 25, 2001