Pseudo-Cons Rally For Amnesty


With a majority of Republicans

opposing
President Bush`s amnesty plan for illegal
immigrants and even Republican lawmakers in revolt over
it, the Open Borders Lobby has closed ranks and rallied
behind it.

Last week the Wall Street
Journal
editorial page, long the

Pravda
of Open Borders propaganda, published what
purports to be a

"Conservative Statement of Principles on
Immigration."
Conspicuous by their absence from
the names of those who signed it were any conservatives.
Conspicuous also was the absence of very much

principle
.

The fourteen signers included Open
Borders pusher

Stephen Moore
, whose claim even to be a conservative
at all is open to doubt, since he worked for some years
at the libertarian

Cato Institute
. Other signers included
neo-conservatives

Linda Chavez
, Newt

Gingrich
and Jack Kemp, long known for their support
for virtually unlimited immigration, and Republican
activist

Grover Norquist
, Microsoft king Bill Gates` hired
man for pushing for cheap labor—though Mr.

Norquist
, reportedly paid $100,000 by Mr. Gates

some years ago
to lobby conservatives for

more immigration
, doesn`t

come cheap himself

All of the above of course are
entitled to their opinions, but their opinions don`t
represent either grassroots conservatives, the views of
mainstream conservative leaders, or the preferences of
most Americans.

Where are conservative critics of
mass immigration like former National Review
editors

John O`Sullivan
and

Peter Brimelow
?

Where was the

Rockford Institute
, which pioneered conservative
awareness of the immigration issue from the 1980s?

Where are the leaders of
conservative immigration control activism like

Americans for Immigration Control
?

Where is

Pat Buchanan
,

Phyllis Schlafly
,

Charley Reese
and other leading journalists who
advocate stronger controls?

The "Statement of Principles"
conveniently forgot those major voices of the movement
they purport to speak for.

As for the "Principles"
themselves, let`s see.

"America is a

nation of immigrants
,"
the statement begins.
"Except for

Native American Indians
, everyone in this country
came to America or is here due to the good fortune that
a parent, grandparent, or other relation came before
them."

Of course that`s true of every
country on Earth, unless you count the Garden of Eden.
But of course also it`s simply untrue that America is
"a nation of immigrants."
The vast majority of
Americans in

every generation
of our national history consists of
Americans who were

born in this country
. We are not and were not
immigrants.

Then we have the assertion,
"Conservatives believe in legal immigration."
Well,
not really. What conservatives—real conservatives, not

libertarians
and not

shills
for

Big Business
—believe in is their own country and its
culture and the people who created it.

If immigration helps sustain that,
OK, conservatives would support some of it, but the
population of a healthy country and culture normally
sustains itself.

A country for which immigration is
"crucial," as this statement claims it is for
this country, is a sick puppy.  This country has
problems, but we aren`t so bad off as that.

"Conservatives oppose illegal
immigration."
You bet, so why have we heard
virtually nothing from our principled authors about it
for the last 30 years of the mass invasion by illegal
immigrants? Why has not a one of them done anything at
all in his entire career to stop illegal immigration or
demand the federal government do more to control it?

As for Mr. Bush`s amnesty plan,
they`re all for it—"We applaud the president and
believe his approach holds great promise to reduce
illegal immigration and establish a humane, orderly, and
economically sensible approach to migration that will
aid homeland security and free up border-security assets
to focus on genuine threats."

The only problem is, we just don`t
have enough immigration in this country. Congress should
shut up about rejecting the Bush plan and increase
immigration: "Congress can fulfill its role by
establishing sufficient increases in legal immigration
and paths to

permanent residence
to enable more workers to stay,
assimilate, and become

part of America
."

Finally, our principled
conservatives get to the unpleasant subject of

assimilation
, which should be a real conservative`s
first principle. "We believe strongly in assimilation
and oppose efforts to weaken the historical process that
has led to e pluribus unum."

A hot flash:

"E Pluribus Unum"
refers to the origin of
the federal government in

separate and independent states
,
not to

cultures and races
, something conservatives

used to
understand.

And, yet again, when have these
stalwarts ever demanded that immigrants assimilate and
what have they done to make sure it happens?

The "Statement of Principles"
is a transparent effort by 14 phony conservatives to
hijack the conservative label and use it to push the
Open Borders clichés they`ve been selling for years.

As the bitter and angry reaction to
the Bush amnesty shows, it won`t sell today any better
than it has for the last 30 years.

COPYRIGHT

CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.

[Sam Francis [email
him] is a nationally syndicated columnist. A selection
of his columns,

America Extinguished: Mass Immigration And The
Disintegration Of American Culture
, is now available
from

Americans For Immigration Control.

Click here
for Sam Francis` website.


Click

here
to order his monograph
,
Ethnopolitics: Immigration, Race, and the American
Political Future and
here for
Glynn Custred`s review.
]