Needed: A “New War” Against The Homegrown Villains

[VDARE
comment: some of this may seem incredible, but click on
links and here
for documentation.]

Americans are hot to retaliate for
September 11 as soon as the responsible parties are
known. Not knowing whom to bomb makes us feel impotent.
Americans crave the catharsis of payback.

But, alas, many of the responsible
parties cannot be bombed, because they are right here at
home. Let me tell you who they are.

U.S. defenses against terrorist
attacks rely on the sophisticated satellite and
surveillance technology of the National Security Agency
to intercept communications. We foil terrorist plots by
listening to their plans in advance of their actions.

President Bush wants to know why
U.S. intelligence agencies provided no warning. How did
the large volume of terrorist communications go
undetected over the many months necessary for planning
and coordinating the events of September 11?

The National Security Agency was
deaf to the voluminous terrorist communications, because
the Clinton administration provided the terrorists with
computer networks that cannot be monitored, with
spread-spectrum radios that change frequency constantly
and are impossible to break into, with fiber optics and
a high level of encryption for their telephones.

As Defense Department official
Peter M. Leitner

told
World Net Daily, “The technology that would
allow these terrorists to mask their communications was
given away, hand over fist, by the Clinton
administration.”

The Clinton administration
permitted the delivery of top-end military
communications equipment to

Syria,
a country officially listed as a threat to
U.S. security.

“Syria,” Leitner said, “is a
terrorist-supporting nation. They provide communications
capabilities to terrorist cells.”

For the Clinton administration
everything was a question of campaign contributions. The
corporations lobbied and contributed and, with the
approval of Clinton and the U.S. Department of Commerce,
sold out our security for terrorist blood money.

The corporations that sold Syria
communications equipment capable of evading detection by
the National Security Agency should be publicly
identified and pilloried. They are prime defendants for
class action suits brought by relatives of the thousands
of Americans killed by the transferred American
technology that protected the terrorists from detection.

Clinton should be vilified.
Perjury is one thing. Rendering inoperable our country`s
defenses against terrorism is high treason.

Before he attacks Afghanistan,
President Bush best clean up his own act. According to
Leitner, the

Commerce Department
is trying today to export high
level telecom equipment to Syria. He fingers Commerce
official Karen Vogel [Send her email at

KVOGEL@bxa.doc.gov
] for repeatedly pressuring the
Pentagon to approve the export of more top-end
equipment.

Now that Leitner has blown the
whistle, it will be interesting to see what happens to
him. Will the government protect itself and distract the
public by bombing abroad?

There are other home-grown
villains in the story. Our immigration policy is one.
The terrorists who crashed the airliners did not sneak
into the U.S. from some dark corner of the Middle East.
They lived in America and were trained as pilots in
American flight schools. They may even have benefited
from federal education money.

U.S. immigration policy makes it
easy for members of every terrorist group in the world
to hang out in America, and

they do
. There are far more Islamic terrorists
living in America and Canada than there are with bin
Laden in Afghanistan. Knowingly or unknowingly,
religious and civil rights organizations provide
terrorist cells with support groups.

Other villains in the story are
the American political left and

multiculturalists
. In the 1970s the political left
used committee hearings conducted by Senator

Frank Church
(D, Idaho) to protect Fidel Castro by
emasculating the CIA, depriving the agency of ability to
eliminate foreigners who pose a threat to our security.

The FBI has not infiltrated Muslim
groups in the U.S. because under the civil rights laws
Muslims are a “protected minority.”

Terrorists in the U.S. are able to
build their networks undeterred and to raise money under
a variety of guises from a large Muslim community.

Multiculturalists in American
universities champion Third World people and denigrate
America, thus helping to fashion a moral atmosphere in
which Muslims are championed as “oppressed people” and
America is challenged as the white hegemon, the
oppressor of women and minorities.

Perhaps it was this moral
atmosphere that deterred jurors from giving the death
penalty to the Muslims who blew up the US Embassy in
Nairobi in 1998. Despite the death  of 213 Americans in
the blast, brainwashed jurors spared the terrorists`
lives on the grounds that the bombing was culturally
determined. [VDARE comment: For
a report on these sensitive American  jurors and their
rationales,

click here
   Don`t count on your “culture” and
“sincere religious beliefs” – we`re not kidding – saving
you if you`re from the Bible Belt.]

September 11 proved that some
Muslims are a danger to us, but we can`t tell one from
another. Civil rights laws require airports to

employ
them in security positions and airlines to
employ them in flight crews and airliner servicing.

Isn`t life in a multicultural
country wonderful?

[VDARE
note: Paul Craig Roberts is the author, with Lawrence M.
Stratton, of The
New Color Line: How Quotas and Privilege Destroy
Democracy
.] 

COPYRIGHT 2001 CREATORS
SYNDICATE, INC.
 


VDARE
note: One members of our Editorial Collective had a hard
time believing that American commercial airlines were
required by law to hire foreign nationals from countries
with which we are not yet at war, but have been
recently, and may be again at any minute. Well, guess
what…here`s the information from the EEOC`s website.



National Origin Discrimination

  • It is illegal to discriminate against an
    individual because of birthplace[Iraq],
    ancestry [Osama
    bin Laden, Jr
    .],
    culture [A
    cultural propensity for


    martyrdom
    ,
    (shahada) immediately
    preceded by mass murder
    ],
    or linguistic characteristics common to a specific
    ethnic group.

  • A rule requiring that employees speak
    only English on the job may violate Title VII unless
    an employer shows that the requirement is necessary
    for conducting business. [Think
    “secret language”. Do you think that when the bombers
    said to each other “It`s now time to hijack the
    plane,” they were speaking English?

    If the employer believes such a rule is
    necessary, employees must be informed when English is
    required and the consequences for violating the rule.

The
Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) of 1986
requires employers to assure that employees hired are
legally authorized to work in the U.S. However, an
employer who requests employment verification only for
individuals of a particular national origin, or
individuals who appear to be or sound foreign may
violate both Title VII and IRCA; verification must be
obtained from all applicants and employees. Employers
who

impose citizenship requirements or give preferences to
U.S. citizens in hiring or employment opportunities also
may violate IRCA.

[
It is now
illegal to use your ears, eyes, or brain. Without
wishing to unfairly stereotype Federal Civil Servants,
this particular rule has been actually practised in
Washington for many, many years.
]

September 15, 2001