Show your support by purchasing VDARE.com merchandise. 
VDARE.com's Amazon connection has been restored! Remember to enter Amazon via the VDARE.com link and we get a commission on any purchases you make—at no cost to you!
Under the current catastrophic interpretation of the
Fourteenth Amendment, an illegal alien woman can
cross the border, give birth to a baby five minutes
later—and that baby is a natural-born U.S. citizen. That
allows hundreds of thousands of
"anchor babies"
born to illegal alien mothers to be awarded automatic
citizenship. It's insane.
The good news: more Americans are becoming educated on
this technical issue.
According to a Rasmussen Reports telephone poll
published last month, 58% (that's a majority) of U.S.
voters "say a
child born to an illegal immigrant in this country
should not automatically become a citizen of the United
States…" Only 33% defend the current status quo.
To
everyone's amazement, even Republican Senators
Lindsey Graham and
John Kyl have both recently made noises about
closing the loophole.
The birthright citizenship scandal can and should be
dealt with at both state and federal levels. Bills to
rectify the loophole by statute have been introduced
into Congress, and should continue to be submitted.
State legislators in several states, including the
heroic
Russell Pearce of Arizona, are also preparing to
tackle this issue. The issue could be voted on in state
initiatives and lawsuits could also be brought to bear.
And, if there's
no other way to rectify it, we should draft a
constitutional amendment to eliminate the
"Anchor Baby"
loophole.
All these reform
proposals,
even those that
fail, keep the issue on the front burner and educate
the public. And
that's great.
Automatic birthright citizenship for the infants of illegal aliens is justified by its defenders with the Fourteenth Amendment.
Here's how the relevant part
reads:
"All persons born
or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the
jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States
and of the State wherein they reside."
Now if original intent means anything, it means that the
14th Amendment was definitely
not drafted to provide citizenship to the children of illegal
aliens.
It was passed in
1868, and its purpose was to guarantee citizenship for
recently freed black slaves—not illegal aliens.
(For more information, read our own Howard Sutherland's
treatise
Weigh Anchor! Enforce the Citizenship Clause
which examines the amendment in historical context. Also
see Washington Watcher's recent article on the rising
controversy
Treason Lobby Does Damage Control On Birthright
Citizenship.)
The key is in that
"subject to the jurisdiction thereof" language.
What we need to prove is that the children of illegal
aliens are not completely
"subject to the
jurisdiction" of the United States.
Happily, we can
prove that very easily— using Mexican law!
According to the Mexican Constitution,
Capitulo II, Articulo 30, the child born to, or
begotten by, a Mexican is a Mexican,
regardless of
where he is born.
Here's the relevant part, in both in both
the English translation and the Spanish original:
"The Mexicans by
birth shall be…The individuals born abroad from Mexican
parents who were born within national territory, from a
Mexican father who was born within national territory or
from a Mexican mother who was born within national
territory…The Individuals born abroad from naturalized
Mexican parents, from a naturalized Mexican father or
from a naturalized Mexican mother…
[Son
mexicanos por nacimiento…los que nazcan en el
extranjero, hijos de padres mexicanos nacidos en
territorio nacional, de padre mexicano nacido en
territorio nacional, o de madre mexicana nacida en
territorio nacional;
…
los que nazcan en el extranjero, hijos de padres
mexicanos por naturalizacion, de padre mexicano por
naturalizacion, o de madre mexicana por naturalizacion…]
Thus, any
child born to a Mexican parent—either mother or father,
regardless of whether that parent is a natural-born
Mexican or naturalized Mexican—regardless of where he is
born, is considered a Mexican.
And Mexican
consulates have the authority to issue documentation to
children born to Mexicans outside of Mexico, to confirm
it.
Think about what that means. According to Mexican law,
every child
born in the United States to a
Mexican mother or
Mexican father is a citizen of Mexico.
[VDARE.com note:
This would include
George P. Bush, son of
Jeb Bush and
Columba Garnica Gallo.]
That means all
these anchor babies born to
illegal alien Mexican mothers in
our
hospitals (often at
public expense) are entitled to be Mexican citizens.
It also means that
all children born to Mexicans
who are legally
in this country are
also entitled
to be Mexican citizens.
So why on earth are we declaring them American citizens?
According to Mexican law, they are
under the
jurisdiction of Mexico.
Thank you Mexico,
for making that crystal clear!
And it's not just
the Mexican constitution. It's the behavior of the
Mexican government in regularly claiming jurisdiction
over children of Mexicans born in the United States.
Here are some examples:
1.Ernest
Zedillo, president of Mexico from 1994-2000, told
the audience at a National Council of La Raza convention
in Chicago that "you are Mexicans too, you just live in the United States." Zedillo
once declared that
"we will not
tolerate foreign forces dictating laws to Mexicans,"
even though he was speaking of Mexican immigrants in the
United States.
2. On May 16th, 2002, Mexican President
Vicente Fox, in
Madrid, Spain, spoke about
"large Mexican
communities settled in that country [the U.S.], more
than 20 million Mexicans…."[Does
Dubya Know About Fox's Madrid Speech?,
VDARE.com, May 29, 2002]
3. On
February 26, 2002, the Mexican consul general of San
Jose, California, visited a school in Salinas,
California, for an observance of
"Mexican Flag Day." The Consul General, Marco Antonio Alcazar, spoke
to a group of fifth and sixth-graders, the majority of
whom were of Mexican ancestry. Alcazar told the students
that "This is exciting because there are many children in this city who were
born in the United States, whose parents are Mexicans,
and these children have the opportunity now to enjoy two
different nationalities and be proudly American and
proudly Mexican." Following the speech and flag
presentation, Alcazar donated two more
Mexican flags and
Mexican textbooks to the school. [School
marks Mexican Flag Day | Consul general presents pupils
with banner By Elia Gonzalez The
Californian,February 26, 2002]
4. U.S.-born dual citizen
Juan Hernandez (Mexican father, American mother)
served as Fox's director of the Presidential Office for
Mexicans Abroad. Hernandez
declared that
"We have
recognized that the Mexican population is 100 million in
Mexico and 23 million who live in the United States....
We are a united nation."
And, in an interview on the American news program
Nightline, Hernandez
stated
bluntly that
"We are
betting that the Mexican American population in the
United States....will think Mexico first."
(Nightline,
June 7, 2001)
5. During the
U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003, the Mexican government
began
taking
"....a census of persons of Mexican ancestry who
belong to the armed forces of the United States and
who are stationed in the war zone..."[Piden
soldados apoyo a gobierno de Fox, El Universal,
March 25, 2003]
Later,
Mexican Foreign
Secretary
Derbez
announced
that Mexico was considering direct negotiations with
Saddam's regime over U.S. soldier prisoners of war who
are dual citizens of the U.S. and Mexico!
6. In 2004, the Mexican Senate and the
Mexican and American Solidarity Foundation held
a conference in Mexico and the theme was "Los
Mexicanos de Aquí y de Allá"- ¿Perspectivas Comunes?"
("The
Mexicans Here [in Mexico] and There
[in the United States]—Common Perspectives?").
7. In 2007, in a
speech in Monterrey, Mexico, Mexican president Felipe
Calderon
said that
"…. for my government, Mexico
does not end at the border. Wherever there is a
Mexican there is the fatherland. That's why we are
acting firmly and with determination to defend the
rights and promote the interests of our
fellow Mexicans abroad."
8.
In 2008, in Dallas, Texas, Calderon
spoke to a meeting of the IME (Institute
for Mexicans Abroad)
a 125-member Mexican-government sponsored group of
Mexican leaders in the United States—many of whom are
dual citizens. The Mexican president
boasted
that 40% of
Dallas' population
is Mexican
Calderon also
endorsed the general Mexican view that children of
Mexicans born in the United States are essentially
Mexicans with added U.S. citizenship. Near the end of
his speech, he said:
"There are
Mexicans who are now Americans because they were born
here…."
Notice how the Mexican government knowingly utilizes
dual citizenship as a tool to further Mexican interests.
(See my VDARE.COM articles
Mexico's Nationality/Citizenship Shell Game and
Shouldn't This Dual Citizenship Thing Be Straightened
Out Before We Allow Millions More Immigrants?
)
9. The
aforementioned
IME
[Instituto de los Mexicanos en el Exterior] is a branch of the SRE
(Mexican Foreign Ministry) designed to
organize
Mexican immigrants in the U.S. and their children
and descendents, to keep them loyal to Mexico.
To Mexico,
Mexicans who move to the United States will always be
Mexicans—even if they become U.S. citizens. Children
born to Mexicans in the U.S. are still Mexicans
according to the Mexican Constitution. And even their
descendents are still considered Mexicans.
So not only is automatic birthright citizenship not
authorized by the U.S. 14th Amendment, but
the Mexican constitution shows us that anchor babies are
not
"under the
jurisdiction" of the United States.
By denying these
alien-parented babies U.S. citizenship, we are not
punishing them.
We are not
depriving them of anything.
We are not
hurting them.
After all, these
babies are
already considered citizens of Mexico.
And that's where they ought to be returned,
along with their parents.
It's only fair.
Thank you,
Mexico, for claiming jurisdiction over all these anchor
babies.
Now you can take care of them!
American citizen Allan Wall (email
him) recently moved back to the