Show your support by purchasing VDARE.com merchandise. 
VDARE.com's Amazon connection has been restored! Remember to enter Amazon via the VDARE.com link and we get a commission on any purchases you make—at no cost to you!
Get ready folks.
This week, on May 19th and 20th,
Mexican president Felipe Calderon
is
scheduled
to visit Washington D.C.
Calderon plans to
visit with President Obama and to address a joint
session of Congress. (The congressional address
is
scheduled
for 11 a.m. on Thursday, May 20th).
Hmmm, what do you
think he´ll talk about?
Think he´ll dare
meddle in U.S. immigration policy? Do you suppose he´ll
talk about
Arizona's SB 1070,
which enables Arizona to enforce federal immigration
law?
Of course Calderon will talk about it. In fact, the Permanent Commission of the
Mexican Congress (a sort of mini-Congress with 37
members that makes rulings when the full Mexican
Congress is on recess) has
called on
Calderon to lambast
SB
1070
when addressing the U.S. Congress.
And Calderon has
been warming up. In early May, for example, the Mexican
president was in Bonn, Germany, bashing SB 1070 in a
joint
press conference
with German Chancellor Angela
Merkel.
From his German platform, he called on Mexicans to not
take "unnecessary
trips" to Arizona.
(So could
illegal aliens
and
drug
smugglers
stop entering Arizona too? Or are their
incursions
considered "necessary"?)
But it's not just
the president. Mexico's entire government is opposed to
Arizona's law.
Also
in early May,
Arturo
Sarukhan, Mexican
ambassador to the U.S., traveled with Mexico's
Undersecretary for North America,
Julian Ventura, to the state of Arizona. According to
the Mexican foreign ministry, they were there to
coordinate the fight against SB 1070. (Yes, the majority
of Arizonans support it, but sorry, the Mexican
government doesn't). Sarukhan and Ventura met with the
five Mexican consuls in Arizona, with U.S. lawyers
fighting Arizona's law, and with other like-minded
activists.
Fernando Gomez
Mont, Mexican Interior Secretary, traveled to
Washington, D.C. where he appeared in a forum with Janet
Napolitano and
said SB 1070 would cause "racist"
treatment of Mexicans in Arizona. Napolitano, meanwhile,
promised not to deport illegal aliens. She also boasted
about having vetoed SB 1070-like measures while she was
governor of the state.
Carlos Navarrete,
president of the Mexican Senate,
sent
a letter to
President Obama, complaining about SB 1070. Navarrete
considers Obama his
"ally"
in the
fight
against the Arizona law
and wants permanent contact between the White House and
the Mexican Senate to fight it.
But it's not only
Mexican politicians who are opposing SB 1070. Mexican
musicians and singers are joining in the fight. For
example, Los Tigres del Norte, the group that sang the
Reconquista anthem
"Somos
Mas Americanos" is
agitating
against the law.
On May 16th,
Mexico City's
Zocalo (the
principal plaza) was the scene of a big rock concert,
attended by up to 80,000 fans, sponsored by the Mexico
City Department of Education.
The title of this
extravaganza was "Jóvenes
Prepa sí por la dignidad: Todos somos
Arizona"—"High
School Youth for Dignity—We are All Arizona".
The headline acts
were Mexican rock groups
Jaguares,
Maldito Vecindad,
and
Molotov,
(see
Molotov's
"Frijolero"—Malicious Mexican Music on MTV).
These well-heeled
Mexican rockers were performing in the plaza, and
lambasting a law that was passed by the
democratically-elected government of Arizona and is
supported by a
majority of its citizens.
Maldita Vecindad
said the law is racist and unjust. Los Jaguares´ Saul Hernandez
proclaimed
that SB 1070 is both
"useless" and "tramples human
rights". (But if it's useless, how could it trample
human rights?)
Indeed, any
attempt by Americans to control their border has been
attacked
for
years
by the Mexican government and chattering classes.
But it's sheer
hypocrisy.
Mexico has its own
immigration law which clearly defines its national
policy in terms of Mexican national interest (See my
Learning About Immigration Policy from Mexico).
Mexicans attack SB 1070 because it authorizes Arizona
police to enforce immigration law. But in Mexico, local
police are absolutely
required
to enforce Mexican immigration law.
Illegal aliens found in Mexico
are routinely detained and deported, and often treated
quite badly.
Will the Arizona
law lead to profiling? Here is
a
report
of how some
Mexican Indians
were profiled and almost deported to
Guatemala. Read
about this well-publicized
incident
in which Mexican Marines and immigration agents beat up
illegal aliens.
Mexican officials
openly meddle in U.S. immigration policy, but no such
behavior by foreigners is tolerated south of the border.
When a former Spanish prime minister
endorsed
a Mexican candidate a
firestorm
ensued. And while Mexican illegal aliens march openly in
U.S. streets demanding amnesty,
Americans
who´ve dared to march in a Mexican demonstration have
been
unceremoniously booted
from the country. While Mexicans demand that millions of
illegals be legalized north of the border, in Mexico,
British spelunkers
were deported for supposedly exploring a cave with the
wrong kind of visa.
And foreigners
shouldn't expect, by the way, to be able to waltz into
Mexico and get free medical care. Whereas in the U.S.
emergency rooms
are utilized for
free
medical care by illegal aliens—even
for non-emergency treatment—in
Mexico emergency rooms are
still
emergency rooms.
Mexicans shriek
about any sort of border control and decry a
militarization
of the border. But the Mexican side of the border is
already militarized
by the Mexican military.
As a matter of
fact, many of Mexico's immigration procedures are worthy
of emulation by the United States—as is its
photo
ID voter registration system,
which is better than the slipshod Motor Voter regime of
many U.S. states.
The bottom line:
the Mexican government's stance is the epitome of
hypocrisy.
But when is this
ever pointed out to
Mexican officials?
Shouldn't our own
President and Secretary of State be pointing it out?
That doesn't seem
too likely. But don't you wish some intrepid reporter
would ask Calderon about it when the
Mexican president comes to Washington?
The reporter
doesn't even have to be rude about it. He can just ask
about a few of the details I have mentioned above. The
goal is to demonstrate in public the vast disconnect
between what Mexico demands of us and how it manages its
own immigration.
If Mexican leaders
can
brazenly meddle in our immigration policy,
and if
Mexican illegals can
march
openly in our streets,
why on earth can't some reporter bring this up and put
Calderon on the spot?
American citizen Allan Wall (email
him) recently moved back to the