Maybe We Can All Get Along—But Not Because Of Interracial Marriage


The

Los Angeles Times
editorialized on April 30:

Generation
Tolerant

"For
California`s teenagers and young adults, the answer to

Rodney King`s
question is a definite yes: We can
all get along. Race and ethnicity, according to a new
survey of Californians ages 16 to 22, are far less
significant to this generation than to any in the past."

LAT to peasants: Pay no
attention to those brown v. black race riots behind the

curtain
in LA

high schools
and

jails
!

[VDARE.COM
NOTE:
The cell phone survey is here:


California Dreamers: A Public Opinion Portrait Of The
Most Diverse Generation The Nation Has Known
, New
American Media is conglomeration of


ethnic journalists.
]

The LAT continued:

"Not
only are young people encouragingly unconcerned about
the skin color or nationality of others, they don`t
think of themselves much that way, either. When asked
the most significant aspects of their identity, they
chose music and fashion. Their tribes? Punk-rock
skaters, hip-hop activists, salseros."

Well, okay … but didn`t anybody at
the LA Times notice that punk-rock skaters
(white), hip-hop activists (black), and salseros
(Latino, I presume) are almost ethnically
exclusive categories?

Indeed, in my three decades of
living in LA, I`ve never even heard the term "salsero"
before. That shows how culturally unified LA is.
Granted, I`m an old fogey—but, according to Google, this
is the

first time
"salseros" has ever
appeared in the L.A. Times!

The LAT continues, somewhat
credulously:

"The
survey, sponsored by New America Media, found
dramatically liberal attitudes when it comes to the
issue of getting along. Two-thirds say they have dated
someone of another ethnicity, and a whopping 87% say
they would marry or have a life partner of a different
race."

Maybe. Or maybe “Generation
Tolerant”
is simply “Generation Politically
Correct”
—intimidated from its early youth by the
Baby Boom refugee radicals who now

infest the education industry
.

This obsession with

interracial marriage
reflects the

common assumption
among white pundits that, by
generating

multiracial individuals
with

family ties across racial lines,
it will allow
America finally to "transcend
race
."

Yet, some unexpected things have
been happening recently on the intermarriage front.



  • First
    ,
    the rate of interethnic marriage between whites and
    Latinos and whites and Asians has been dropping.

Hence this press release from

Ohio State
, summarizing a February 2007 article in
American Sociological Review:


"Immigration played a key role in unprecedented declines
in interracial and inter-ethnic marriage in the United
States during the 1990s, according to a new sociological
study. The findings, published in `Social
Boundaries and Marital Assimilation: Interpreting Trends
in Racial and Ethnic Intermarriage
,` suggest that
the growing number of Hispanic and Asian immigrants to
the United States has led to more marriages

within these groups
, and fewer marriages between
members of these groups and whites."

This trend has been

visible
for some time in Southern California. Asians
used to be widely dispersed all over the suburbs, and
thus tended to marry the whites around them. Now,
however, not only are there more Asians, but they tend
to cluster in the San Gabriel Valley. So you see a
higher proportion of Asian-Asian couples than you did a
quarter of a century ago. This has obvious implications
for assimilation.


  • Second, the percentage of people who tell the Census
    Bureau they are multiracial has actually
    dropped
    over the last half decade.

Hence this:

"The
share of Americans who identify themselves as
multiracial has shrunk this decade, an unexpected trend
in an increasingly diverse nation. About 1.9% of the
people checked off

more than one race
in a 2005 Census Bureau survey of
3 million households, a meaningful decline from two
surveys in 2000." (Fewer
Americans call themselves multiracial
, by Haya El
Nasser, USA TODAY,
May 4, 2007
)

It`s not clear why people have
become less like to identify as multiracial, but it`s
striking that this has happened.


  • Third, people of diverse ancestries do not
    necessarily "transcend race".

As biographical accounts about
people of multiracial backgrounds accumulate, the less
confidence we should feel in making simple presumptions
about how mixed descent will impact their views on race.
Some people of diverse ancestries do indeed
"transcend race,"
as Ward Connerly`s life story

shows. Often, however, having recent ancestors
of different races leads to the exact opposite
psychological and political reaction—an exacerbated race
consciousness—as Barack Obama`s
little-understood autobiography
demonstrates.

Connerly first came to national
renown in 1996 as the leader of the successful campaign
for California`s Proposition 209, the initiative
authored by Thomas Wood and

Glynn Custred
to outlaw racial preferences a.k.a.

quotas
.


Connerly
explained his complex family tree to me in

2003
:

"My
maternal grandmother was half

Irish
and half

Choctaw Indian.
My maternal grandfather was white of

French descent.
My paternal grandmother was part
Irish and part American Indian and my paternal
grandfather was of African descent. My grandchildren are
all of me and their Irish grandmother, and two of the
four are all of that and are partly of

Vietnamese
descent as well."

This background has helped inspire
Connerly to crusade for colorblind laws. In response to
the

Supreme Court`s
notorious 2003 U. of Michigan

decision
upholding race quotas (just as long as
they`re not called quotas!), Connerly devoted over three
years to a heroic campaign to reproduce Prop. 209 in
Michigan. To be honest, I didn`t think his new
Proposition 2 stood a chance because almost the entire
Michigan establishment of both parties opposed him. Yet,
Connerly`s initiative won a stunning

58 percent
of the vote last November.


Connerly
is now working to put similar affirmative
action bans on the ballot in

Arizona, Colorado Missouri, and Oklahoma
.

In sharp contrast to Connerly,
though, is the popular Senator and Presidential
candidate Barack Obama. He made a

radio ad
last year opposing Connerly`s
Proposition 2.

Obama played to this white
expectation that interracial marriage leads to
interracial harmony in his famous keynote

address
at the 2004Democratic convention. It began
with a (heavily
airbrushed
) version of his family history,
recounting how his father from Kenya and his mother from
Kansas met in

Hawaii
.

Obviously, that must make Obama
feel equally warmly toward both races! Right?

And sophisticated listeners also
understood that Hawaii has never been home to the
one-drop rule, which automatically defines the offspring
of mixed marriages as belonging solely to the minority
parent`s race.

Clearly, Obama must be bringing a
new, more sophisticated Hawaiian conception of race to
the Mainland!

Those pleasant presumptions,
however, are all exploded, however, merely by reading
Obama`s 1995 autobiography, Dreams from My Father: A
Story of Race and Inheritance Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance.
Obama
has no room in his heart for Hawaiian multiracialism.
The identity he labored so relentlessly to construct for
himself is monoracially black—even though he only spent
one month with his

black father
, who, when his son was only two,
abandoned the white teenage girl he had (bigamously)
married.

In his Introduction, Obama
describes his book as "the record of a personal,
interior journey—a boy`s search for his father, and
through that search a workable meaning for his life as a
black American."

And when Obama runs into other
part-black people who actually do profess a
multiracial identity, the future Presidential candidate
is disturbed and annoyed by them.

For example, when Obama is in his
late 20s, he finally meets his half-brother "Mark,"
a physics student at Stanford who is the son of their
father`s third wife (and second white American wife).
Mark, who

grew up in Africa
and thus doesn`t share the

Honolulu-born
Obama`s romantic conception of the

Mother Continent,
perturbs Obama by not being a

black racialist
. When Obama challenges him over his
lack of

black African identity,
Mark tells him:

"Other
things move me. Beethoven`s symphonies. Shakespeare`s
sonnets. I know—it`s not what an African is supposed to
care about. But who`s to tell me

what I should and shouldn`t care about
?"

Obama thereupon immediately and
permanently cuts off all contact with his own
half-brother.

Similarly, Obama dumps a girlfriend
he might have married when he visits her prosperous
parents` country house and realizes how deeply rooted
they are in traditional white American culture.
Apparently he found that an intolerable threat that is
to the black identity he devised for himself in Hawaii
while watching

Soul Train
on TV:

"The
family knew every inch of the land, … the names of the
earliest white settlers—their ancestors … I realized
that our two worlds, my friend`s and mine, were as
distant from each other as

Kenya
is from

Germany
. And I knew that if we stayed together I`d
eventually live in hers … I pushed her away."

Of course,

in reality,
Obama, the preppie from paradise, has
spent much of his life collecting credentials from
educational institutions begun by white people quite
similar to his ex-lover`s parents:

Punahou School
(Hawaii`s top prep school, founded by

New England missionaries in 1841
),

Occidental College
in Los Angeles (founded 1887),

Columbia University
(founded

1754
), and

Harvard
(founded

1636
).

You might imagine that the generous
treatment these prototypically white institutions
afforded Obama might make him better disposed toward his
mother`s race.

After all, the loving care Connerly
received from the white-Indian grandmother who raised
him helps him look benignly on all races.

But, Obama, like most humans, isn`t
as emotionally straightforward as Connerly. As Ben
Franklin

pointed out,
if you

want somebody to like you
, don`t do them a
favor. They will just resent the fact that you can
do them a favor.

So the intellectuals` assumption
that

interracial marriage
will eliminate

racial conflict
turns out to be naïve—at best.

But it`s one of the rationales used
to justify our

current immigration disaster
.

[Steve Sailer [email
him] is founder of the Human Biodiversity Institute and

movie critic
for


The American Conservative
.
His website

www.iSteve.blogspot.com
features his daily
blog.]