Show your support by purchasing VDARE.com merchandise. 
VDARE.com's Amazon connection has been restored! Remember to enter Amazon via the VDARE.com link and we get a commission on any purchases you make—at no cost to you!
Since the Obama administration has had
little success in fixing the economy,
it is using a diversionary tactic of crushing free
speech--particularly against the stubborn majority of
American citizens who want immigration to be legal,
controlled and reduced.
The false accusations of racism against immigration
patriots have gradually lost their intimidating effect.
Even otherwise leftist bastions like
San Francisco
are
sick of the chaos
and
crime
spawned by foreign criminals allowed to run wild.
So now even bigger guns are being brought into the fray.
The Treason Lobby wants to crush dissent especially
against amnesty for tens of millions of lawbreaking
foreigners, although
unemployment is the worst in 25 years.
(A June 20 LA
Times headline just declared
Immigration reform to get a quiet kickoff.
Obamatrons may
hope for a stealth amnesty
done in the dark of night. )
One new weapon: the concept of
"hate crimes"—a
drive by left-wingers to further privilege their
favorite protected classes, and dispossess the majority
of Americans who still believe in equality under the
law.
When the
mugger
of a gay Hispanic gets more jail time than a similar
attacker against a
white heterosexual,
that basic legal principle has been violated.
"Hate Crimes"
are thoughtcrimes writ large, straight from the
pages
of
1984.
Radical utopians are strangely consumed with the topic
of hate, a sometimes regrettable but normal component of
feelings. For example, the Southern Poverty Law Center
has its
Hatewatch
blog and La Raza has a spinoff titled
"We can stop the hate"
(in the immigration debate).
Other traditions have a more nuanced view--that negative
feelings can be put to positive uses. Scripture
recommends that we
"hate evil" [Psalm
97:10]
and "cleave to that which is good" [Romans
12:9].
The double standard on crime perps and victims is
stunning--as recently noted by VDARE.COM Peter Brimelow
(Holocaust
Hullaballoo Reveals "Hate Crimes" Hypocrisy).
When the perp corresponds to the left's favored
narrative of angry white male run amok—e.g. the shooter
at the Holocaust Museum—the press shrieks loud and long
in horror.
But when a "hate
crime" is committed by a diverse person, Main Stream
Media interest fades rapidly.
A classic example: the
Brooklyn murder of Ecuadoran immigrant
Jose Sucuzhanay, who had been walking home arm in arm
with his brother, and may have appeared gay to the two
men who beat him to death. This was a highly publicized
case, with gay, Hispanic and immigrant groups expressing
outrage. But news articles rarely mentioned that the
attackers were black--and when the accused young men
were arrested,
mug shots were hard to find.
The leftists in power want a permanent Democrat
majority. They think they can achieve using immigration
(legal and illegal), periodic amnesties to create a
grateful voting bloc, and repression of the resultant
patriotic protest.
Thus a June 17
Washington Post headline blared,
Immigration Debate Tied to Rise in Hate Crimes,
[By Spencer S. Hsu]
quoting the
usual suspects
of the left who identify themselves as
"civil rights
leaders." Their trumpeted
"report" is
squishy, to say the least:
Confronting the New Faces of Hate: Executive Summary.
In the nearly twenty years since the 1990 enactment of
the Hate Crime Statistics Act (HCSA),
the number of hate
crimes reported has consistently ranged around 7,500 or
more annually—that's nearly one
every hour of every day.
However, the
population of the United States has increased
substantially since 1990, when the number was
248.7 million
while today's
Census estimate
is
well over
306 million. That means the incidence has decreased
according to a more reasonable, per capita analysis.
Even CNN report from February 26, noted at the time in
the VDARE.COM blog,
$PLC Misrepresents "Hate" Crime,
made the same point:
"KITTY PILGRIM: Now, we talked to the FBI today about
the report. The FBI does not recognize the term 'hate
group'. They told us they do not monitor individuals or
groups of individuals based on what they think or they
say, or because a group or individual espouses a cause.
It's only when a line is crossed and when an act of
violence is committed.
"Now, by that measure, hate crimes are going down. The
FBI uses data collected by state and local
law-enforcement agencies, and this is what we've found.
In 1995, hate crimes totaled 7,974. In 2007, 12 years
later, they totaled 7,624. That's a decline of 4
percent.
"Meanwhile, the U.S. population rose 16 percent in that
period of time. So,
hate crimes are
definitely declining, according to the FBI. And it's
interesting, Lou,
what the Southern Poverty Law Center defines as a hate
group.
They say it's based on ideology. It's not based on
action. If you're included in this group, it's not based
on criminality or violence or future..."
[CNN
Transcript,
Feb 26, 2009]
Meanwhile, unremarked by our elite, the body count of
innocent Americans killed by immigrants continues to
mount. Some of these crimes are reported locally only, a
few make headlines nationwide, but there's never a
national media alarm
that the deaths were entirely preventable had Washington
been doing its job of controlling the borders.
A quick look at the
"Immigrant Mass Murder Syndrome"
category in the blog gives a long list of killers, many
motivated by
"hate," who've taken American lives:
This is in spite of the fact that most of these shooters
were part of the Asian
"model minority."
Not quite so unexpected were shootings like these:
And of course many cases of
"sudden
jihad"
by immigrants from the
Religion of Peace:
There's an additional category we call
"Immigrant Familicide,"
which consists of an immigrant snapping and killing as
many members of their family as they can manage:
See a pattern here? As I analyzed in my April article, The Binghamton Massacre—Latest Case of Immigrant Mass Murder Syndrome, immigration is a huge stress multiplier for people who are already on the edge. The terrible economy has driven citizens to violence, and immigrants are not immune. In fact, many have more pressures, including inability to speak English adequately, unreasonable expectations of what they can achieve in this country and the overwhelming complexity of modern society.
Our 2007 tally of the Immigrant Mass Murder syndrome cost was "23 killers, about 238 dead, some 111 wounded. And counting." That was after Virginia Tech, (32 dead, 25 wounded) but before Jiverly Voong, (13 dead, 4 wounded) VDARE.COM's latest count: there have been at least another 15 incidents of Immigrant Mass Murder Syndrome since then, claiming more than 60 additional lives and an unknown, but large, number of wounded. That would put the total at over 300 lives lost to this underreported phenomenon.
It's enough to make one
recall
Enoch Powell's
declaration:
"The supreme
function of statesmanship is to provide against
preventable evils."
Mass murder may be unpredictable--but is there is any
more preventable evil than a serial offender illegal
alien, particularly a drunk driver? One
DUI arrest should
bring an
automatic one-way ticket
to the dear homeland.
Such a policy would definitely save lives—but is it hate
speech in the Obama kingdom to say that
Hispanics drive drunk
more
commonly
than
Americans?
Does the truth still count as a defense?
The open-borders speech police have a lot of blood on
their hands.
A diverse paradise is not breaking out in America; quite the contrary. At a time when elites embrace transnationalism and regard the nation-state as the 8-track tape of political organization, Juan Sixpack remains attached to tribe above all. In the most multiculturated state, California, traditional Americans have been fleeing the place for years to escape the Mexifornia rot. Criminal gangs of every flavor have spread explosively throughout the country, though Mexican criminal organizations predominate in the drug trade.
The truth isn't pretty these days, and the Obama administration's desire to squelch the national discussion won't help. They should snap out of their delusions about how much social behavior can be shaped and accept the reality of the tribalism of human nature. It wouldn't hurt to include that fact in policy decisions, particularly regarding immigration.
Of course, to imagine such simple wisdom from the Obamatrons is a fantasy.
This will come to no happy ending.
Brenda Walker (email
her) lives in Northern California and publishes
two websites,
LimitsToGrowth.org
and
ImmigrationsHumanCost.org.
She thinks our plain-spoken
33rd President,
"Give 'em hell"
Harry Truman said it
right: "I never gave
anybody hell. I just told the truth and they thought it
was hell."