Remember to enter Amazon via the VDARE.com link and we get a commission on any purchases you make—at no cost to you!
Gabrielle Giffords, Larry McDonald, Sarah Palin—And The Profound Instability Of American Politics
The
Main Stream Media feeding frenzy around the
shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords,
so
extreme
that
it even attracted the
ridicule
of Slate's
liberal press critic
Jack Shafer—who had also earlier been commendably
sensible
about calls to suppress (conservative) rhetoric—seems
now to be dying down.
This
means
VDARE.com
finally be able to post
Steve Sailer's
latest on the
Sailer Strategy
this Sunday. (I wasn't going to throw it away). But it
also means that, incredibly, this whole news cycle has
gone by without any substantive attention to the
obviously parallel case of Congressman
Larry McDonald.
Who now remembers McDonald? Not
Washington Post smart alec
Ezra
Klein,
who
blogged
on Jan 9: "The
last congressman killed while doing his job was Rep. Leo
Ryan, who was slain in
Jonestown
in
1978".
A
reader commented
timorously:
"Not that I was
his biggest fan, but perhaps we should include Larry
McDonald". Klein, however, did not feel obliged to
correct his mistake, and Google reveals no other recent
discussion of the Georgia Democrat who died when a
Soviet interceptor shot down
Korean Air Lines Flight 007
in
1983.
The
plain and shocking truth:
Larry McDonald
has gone down the
memory hole.
The reason, as Klein's reader intuited, is all too
clear. McDonald
("the most principled man in Congress"—Rep.
Ron
Paul,
quoted on Wikipedia, 1-13-10) was a very conservative
Democrat, the president of the
John
Birch Society,
a fierce anti-Communist and such a rising star on the
Right that, ore than twenty years later, conservative
movement icon Reed Irvine of
Accuracy In Media was still
demanding
answers to
rumors
that McDonald had been the target of the attack, had
survived and was imprisoned in the
Lubyanka.
McDonald's fate was by any measure a more sensational
story than that of Giffords (who also, of course, has
mercifully survived).
But
it simply did not fit in with the
liberal agenda
in 1983, when the Cold War was in its final convulsions
and the
Soviets had launched a desperate nuclear disarmament
offensive,
mysteriously abetted (in a way that I believe still
deserves the attention of historians) by MSM artifacts
like the
novel Warday
and
the
defeatist
television movie The Day After
,
which the
ABC network
crassly broadcast only weeks after McDonald's death.
The McDonald story faded, or was
faded, much faster than the Giffords story. (I was
there—I remember). And, manifestly, it has left no trace
in popular culture or whatever it is that informs the
worldview of the Ezra Kleins.
In contrast, the Giffords story did fit right into the
liberal agenda
of 2011. At the center of that agenda:
repression.
That is why, as I
predicted
after the last Presidential election, one of the first
things the Obama Administration did was to
ram
through
the "Hate
Crime"
bill, even though Attorney General Eric Holder
unguardedly
admitted
it unequally (and arguably
unconstitutionally)
did not protect whites, or Christians, and even though
it was obvious that the legislation would be
interpreted as restricting speech.
Why repression? The reason is equally plain: American
politics now is profoundly
unstable. In effect, the Obama Administration is (to put
it brutally) a
Minority Occupation Government.
At all costs, the Left must keep the historic American
nation from
uniting—which
it nevertheless began to do (no thanks to the GOP
leadership) in the
2010
election.
This comes naturally, because the Politically Incorrect
fact is that neither the Left's
black,
Hispanic
or
Jewish
components have any real
tradition of free speech. The
question is whether they can cow the historic American
nation into accepting its subjugation.
And
this is the true significance of
Sarah Palin.
Here at VDARE.COM, we have been
mildly skeptical
of Palin because she shows essentially no
awareness of
the immigration issue. But she does have courage. With
her "blood libel"
posting,
she threw the political class back on the defensive,
and chose a phrase that was exquisitely calculated to focus
attention on her text. (Our frenemy
Larry Auster
has
posted
the definitive defense of her language, citing examples
of its use in
Commentary
magazine.)
"We
love him for the enemies he has made",
said
Grover Cleveland's nominator at the Democratic
convention in 1884.
Sarah Palin is making the right
enemies.
Peter Brimelow (email him) is editor of VDARE.COM and author of the much-denounced Alien Nation: Common Sense About America's Immigration Disaster, (Random House - 1995) and The Worm in the Apple (HarperCollins - 2003)






