Ed Gillespie / Mark Warner
Virginia GOP Senate candidate Ed Gillespie claimed he had “not seen” Ted Cruz’s bill to combat Obama’s Administrative Amnesty and declined to endorse it during his debate with Democratic Senator Mark Warner Saturday night. [Mark Warner on offense in Virginia Senate Debate, by James Hohmann, Politico, July 26, 2014] Typical: Ed Gillespie is a caricature of an Establishment Republican—former lobbyist, George W. Bush advisor, Republican National Committee head. Needless to say, offering voters a corporate cartoon at a time of national crisis isn’t working. Because the GOP has allowed the demographic transformation of Virginia, the only way Republicans can now succeed is by winning over working class white voters and increasing white turnout. But Gillespie can’t do it. He’s the latest example of the GOP Establishment’s dirty little secret: it’s terrible at winning elections.
How bad a candidate is Gillespie? Let us count the ways.
- He’s never actually been elected to anything before – he’s simply a consultant, lobbyist, and political insider. As a result, his name recognition is terrible.
- He’s being crushed in fundraising, even though his supposed skill here is a major reason he was nominated. Though Gillespie is a former head of the RNC, Warner is decisively outraising him, $2.7 million to $1.9 million in the last quarter. Of more concern, Warner has $8.9 million cash on hand to Gillespie’s $3.1 million, and has outraised Gillespie by almost $10 million since the start of the campaign. [Warner maintains edge on Gillespie in fundraising, by Markus Schmidt and Olympia Meola, Richmond Times-Dispatch, July 16, 2014]
- He blundered into a controversy over minimum wage laws, after dismissing minimum wage employment as jobs where you learn “the social aspects of work” rather than a means to support families. He then managed to contradict himself as to whether he supported minimum wage laws at all. [Ed Gillespie Downplays Struggle of Living on Minimum Wage, by Alex Lazar, Huffington Post, July 9, 2014]
- His platform looks like a parody of a Beltway Right panel discussion, with the cringe-inducing name of “EG2.” With the exception of “replacing Obamacare,” the other issues are all wonkish Beltway bait like “energy policy,” “tax relief,” “education reform,” and “cutting spending.”
- His one desperate stab at populism is a pointless crusade against the Import-Export bank – the same issue the Beltway Right tried to blame for Eric Cantor’s defeat. [The Export-Import Bank is Your New Populist Fig Leaf, by David Weigel, Slate, July 9, 2014]
None of the stupefying boredom, tactical incompetence, or banal political correctness that characterizes Gillespie’s campaign is surprising. The entire raison d’être for his campaign is, in the biased words of the New York Times, to show the “intent of more mainstream Virginia Republicans to retake control of the party after a Tea Party-backed candidate lost the governorship.” [Gillespie, Former Republican Chairman, Readies to Run for Senate in Virginia, by Jonathan Martin, New York Times, January 9, 2014]
The unnamed “Tea Party” candidate: Ken Cuccinelli, who had a strong record on immigration that he ran away from during the 2013 gubernatorial election, partially because of political consultants like Ed Gillespie. As a result, Cuccinelli failed to turn out the white base, and suffered an unexpectedly narrow defeat in what even the Main Stream Media called a “base election.”
Despite his cowardly campaign, Cuccinelli’s overall record allowed him to connect with the base better than corporate Republican Ed Gillespie. Gillespie is trailing Senator Warner in a recent poll by an astounding 25 points. [RC Poll: Warner lead Gillespie in Senate race; Clinton keeps edge over possible 2016 Republican rivals; Obama approval down, Roanoke College, July 23, 2014]
Indeed, Gillespie seems like he is deliberately avoiding issues that could rally white voters.
- He is a longtime advocate for amnesty for illegal aliens, a position that has not changed in this campaign, though he is quieter about it. [Ed Gillespie’s immigration reform position remains steady, Politifact, June 13, 2014] In the past, he even gloated that Republicans seemed “resigned” to Amnesty, as apt a summary of the typical Establishment GOP stance as has ever been seen. [Ed Gillespie: Republican Voters Resigned to Immigration Reform, by Elise Foley, Huffington Post, March 28, 2013] His incompetently- designed website requires a search for his position on immigration , where he says he wants to offer “new visas” to illegals.
- Gillespie missed the chance to score easy points against Political Correctness by not taking a strong stand on the government’s attempts to change the name of the local football team, the Washington Redskins. [Campaign Oversight: Virginia pols punt on Redskins name, by Cameron Joseph, Abby Smith, and Alexandra Jaffe, The Hill, June 18, 2014]
- He has not taken a stand on anti-white Affirmative Action; in the past, he has urged Republicans to back away from the issue. [Republican Lobbyist Ed Gillespie is Running for Senate, by Ryan Lizza, The New Republic, January 10, 2014]
- Gillespie said nothing about the removal of Confederate flags from Washington & Lee after demands from Affirmative Action students. (Of course, neither have the Washington & Lee College Republicans, who, like many college conservatives, have mastered the defensive crouch.)
Indeed, Gillespie commented during a prior controversy that contemporary Virginia is “more the Dynamic Dominion than the Old Dominion.” He also said, “The state is “growing and diversifying, and I think the governor’s new proclamation [which pointlessly apologized for slavery] reflects that.” [McDonnell’s laudable lead on Confederate past, Washington Post, October 3, 2010] He also wants diverse GOP candidates. Ed Gillespie seeks ‘diverse’ Republican candidates in the fight for 2014, By Jennifer Harper, The Washington Times, February 6, 2013
Of course, Gillespie’s “Dynamic Dominion” owes much of its economic growth to the boom in federal spending. A penny-pinching campaign about “cutting spending” has nothing to offer a state whose richest areas are almost entirely dependent on government dollars. [Virginia’s Feast on U.S. Funds Nears an End, by Trip Gabriel, New York Times, March 2, 2013]
You would think a “communications consultant” from the DC colony of Alexandria would understand this—even if it was Robert E. Lee’s boyhood home.
Above all, the wonderful growth in diversity that Gillespie hails is driven by immigration, especially from Asia and Latin America. Surprising no-one other than Republican consultants, 66% of Latino voters and 63% of the “model minority” Asian voters supported Democrat Terry McAuliffe in 2013 over Ken Cuccinelli. [New Race Politics and the Virginia Election, by Gary Segura, Latino Decisions, November 6, 2013]
The result is that Gillespie’s “Dynamic Dominion” confronts Republicans with a hostile coalition of affluent, government-dependent voters in Northern Virginia and an increasing population of non-whites who will never vote Republican barring a major realignment. [McAuliffe’s Winning Combo: Northern Virginia and Changing Demographics, by Garance Franke-Ruta, The Atlantic, November 8, 2013]
With whites at 72% of the Virginia electorate in 2013 even with reduced white turnout, Gillespie could still win if he ran a base-driven campaign and confronted Democratic tricks like the usual black voter fraud. Mark Warner knows this, which is why in past campaigns he aggressively campaigned in rural Virginia, hired actors from the Dukes of Hazzard to campaign for him, and sponsored NASCAR teams to reduce his losses among Republican-leaning white voters. [Virginia’s Man of the Moment, by Bob Guldin, GW Magazine, Spring 2002]
But Gillespie has built his entire life and career making sure Republican politicians never represent the interests of the people who vote for them. So Warner actually is better at relating to ordinary Virginians than he is.
Now, in his first-ever election campaign, Gillespie seems confused that lines about “regulatory relief” and other pointless wonkery that go over well with fellow consultants in Arlington and Alexandria don’t resonate with Virginians who see their state and country being stolen from them.
As a consultant, Gillespie has profited greatly from leeching resources away from the conservative base. Now, he’s learning an iron law of nature—the parasite can’t survive without the host.
James Kirkpatrick [Email him] is a Beltway veteran and a refugee from Conservatism Inc.