Remember to enter Amazon via the VDARE.com link and we get a commission on any purchases you make—at no cost to you!
Enough Already About the Mexican-American War!
Last month, during my morning English as a Second Language class, I had an unusually spirited conversation with one of the handful of people who showed up. (Early January is the rainy, foggy and cold season here in California's San Joaquin Valley. And that translates to sparse attendance at the Lodi Adult School.)
Gustava…as I will call her…is one of the better pupils that I have had in my two decades of teaching ESL.
By that I mean that she attends most days, brings a dictionary, speaks above average English for an English language learner, participates actively in the classroom and has a measurable interest not only in the immediate subject matter but also in the broader picture of life in America.
For lack of a better word, I will say that Gustava is "aware."
"That's the thing about the American government…always interfering in other countries. Always fighting and killing people to get its own way," said Gustava.
A few grudgingly admit the war is ancient history. For the majority, however, it could have happened yesterday.
(If you want to hear the harshest possible assessment of Mexican corruption, don't talk to an American immigration reform advocate—ask any Mexican.)
But ultimately, Gustava pointed her finger at Yankee Imperialism.
While it is impossible to deny that the United States was not in a land gobbling mode during the years surrounding the Mexican-American War—Manifest Destiny, remember—what's much more interesting to analyze is the mentality that will not let go of a war fought and lost more than 150 years ago.
Here are a few questions that run through my mind every time someone tells me that America stole land from Mexico.
- How are we defining "stolen"? The United States fought a war with Mexico. Mexico lost. The two countries signed a treaty. The United States gave Mexico $15 million. That's stolen?
- Why have my Vietnamese, Cambodian and Laotian students been able to put behind them the much more recent Southeast Asian War while Mexicans wallow in the 1850s? That futile war destroyed the entire countries of Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos. Men, women and children were forced into exile and refugee camps. Millions were killed. My students from those Asian countries are saddened when the think back. But they are not angry. Even former Defense Secretary Robert McNamara, on a trip to Vietnam, acknowledged that the war is "ancient history" as far as the Vietnamese are concerned.
- If Mexico is still angry, why aren't the French? Years ago, I traveled regularly to France. I never heard word one about "stolen land" or any talk of "getting even" for the Louisiana Purchase. In that transaction, the United States acquired for nickels and dimes what now makes up nearly 25 percent of the national territory.
- Finally—and this is the $64,000 question—is Gustava and every other Mexican in America better off even though the United States "stole," to use their word, the land they now live in? The answer is, overwhelmingly, "Yes." According to a recent report by Transparency International, the oddly-named organization that monitors global corruption, Mexico ranks 58th on the list of most corrupt countries with #1 being the least corrupt.
- Nothing was stolen from Mexico.
- The French never cared.
- And Mexicans are living a better life in a progressive country instead of a Third World slum where so many are still drying laundry on adobe bricks.
Only the Mexicans cling to their distorted view of the distant past…and bring it up at every opportunity.
And may I, at the same time, extend an invitation to those of you griping about a land grab to join the rest of us in the 21st Century?
Joe Guzzardi [email him], an instructor in English at the Lodi Adult School, has been writing a weekly newspaper column since 1988. This column is exclusive to VDARE.COM.