Berkeley Muslim Conference Versus Western Civilization

What happens when Marxism meets Islam at one of
America`s most left-wing universities?

You get a conference called

"Deconstructing Islamophobia: Immigration, Globalization
and Constructing the Other,"
dedicated to the ideas
that the USA is the source of all the world`s evil and
Americans are mean-spirited hicks who denigrate Islam,
in particular by stereotyping the religion—even though
Islam has declared war on the U.S. and western
civilization by direct attack.

You have to wonder
what
the organizers, from something ominously called the

Center for Race and Gender at Berkeley,
[Send
them mail
] had in mind when they chose a woman in
maximum hijab as the event`s icon. Doesn`t that image
feed into the "stereotype" of women being forced
to hide their individual identities from society in a

fabric prison
?

Another negative was the use of the word "Islamophobia."
The dictionary defines a

phobia
as an irrational fear. But a more accurate
description of Americans` attitude would be reasonable
antipathy toward a self-declared enemy.

Quite obviously, the followers of Islam and
multicultural socialism who presented this affair had no
interest beyond preaching to the converted and the
further indoctrination of left-leaning students already
in their clutches.

The two-day event was the mirror opposite of my last
Islam-connected experience on campus, as reported in

"Nonie Darwish vs. Berkeley Left on Islamo-Fascism."

The courageous Egyptian-born woman, now an outspoken
critic of Jihad, was repeatedly interrupted by
harassment and threats. Her description of growing up
female in an Islamic country was too threatening in its
honesty for the far Left to allow without

shrill attempts to shut her up
. (Watch.)

That October evening was a disturbing experience.
Thuggish characters used intimidation in an attempt to
end the free speech of one brave woman. I felt like I
needed to be disinfected just from being there.

But the

Religion of Peace
and its leftist defenders put on
their reasonable hats for the Islamophobia extravaganza,
which scheduled around

two dozen mostly academic speakers
from around the
world, at no small expense. There were no police
required to protect speakers from violent intimidation.
The audience was of one mind—USA
bad,

Islam
good. There was no hostility because there was
no diversity of views: the program was designed to
present a unified ideology.

The major negative note was the endless complaining
that is now the norm when throngs of immigrants get
together. But they were downright cheerful in agreeing
that Americans are terrible people, full of

racism
,

anger
and

colonialist
stereotypes against

innocent Muslims.

It`s a wonder anyone wants to come here at all.

Colonialism was indeed a major theme. Who knew that
it was

still such a big problem
so long after European
powers

relinquished control
over lands in Africa and Asia?

But the shared view of conference speakers was that
Americans` negative attitudes about Muslims arise from

generalizations about exotic foreigners
as the
despised

"other,"
and that thinking came from
colonialism, even though America

was never much of a colonial power
. The ideology is
a handy formula for incorrectly explaining the world and
has little to do with actual history. But the level of
academic integrity is apparently very low in

“Ethnic Studies”
programs.

One speaker,

Sunaina Maira
, [Send
her mail
]mentioned the Barbary pirates, who figured
in a genuine historical episode from America`s early
days, when

President Jefferson
sent the U.S. Navy
to dismantle the Muslim raiders
who had terrorized
the high seas for centuries. Robert C. Davis`s recent
book, Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters
notes
that Islamic pirates took around a million Christians as

slaves
over 300 years.

But Maira used this military strike as an evidence of
colonialism—not as a long-overdue reaction against

mass kidnapping and slavery
by

Muslim terrorists
.

Maira also overlooked the invasions of Muslim armies
attacking Europe, with battles at

Tours
in 732,

Lepanto in 1571
and

Vienna in 1683
. Of course, the Sons of Allah are
back today, but armed with

visas
instead of

swords
.

She similarly neglected the

violence-inciting content of the Koran itself
,
recently the focus of the film

Fitna
, produced by member of the Dutch
Parliament

Geert Wilders.

The

inheritors
of western civilization have plenty of
reason to

regard Muslims
as

permanent and intractable enemies
—not as the victims
of rapacious Europeans and Americans.

But you wouldn`t know that from this one-sided
propaganda fest.

One academic analyst,

Peter Gottschalk
, [Send
him mail
]expressed shock and dismay that political
cartoonists use

ethnic stereotypes
(!) when drawing Arabs and
Muslims. He has published a

book
on this subject, Islamophobia: Making Muslims the Enemy.
Of course, people who frequent the real
world recognize

stereotypes
as being the general currency of

cartoon imagery
. Furthermore,

Arab cartoons
of Israelis, Jews and

Americans
are not exactly generous depictions.

I was also bothered by the
use by some of extreme academic-speak, a version of
English so unintelligible that it made my head ache to
listen. The presentation of

Dina Al-Kassim
[Send
her mail
]was so full of gibberish I began writing
down her curious phrases, e.g.: "old Orientalism,"
"new racism, "

"Muslim collectivity,"
"sudden coherence,"
and
"social discord phantasm. "

I understand that the academic world in certain
fields trains its acolytes to speak this

mutant form of communication
in order to converse in
code and self-identify to other members of the exclusive
group. It`s a strategy designed keep out the riff-raff
who insist upon meaningful debate.

But do many parents regard this dubious skill as
worth the tuition they are paying? I
doubt it.

More substantially disagreeable were some of the
characters given starring roles, in particular

Hatem Bazian
, a lecturer in Near Eastern studies at
UC Berkeley. He created a controversy in 2004 when he
called for an

intifada in the United States
(at a San Francisco
"peace"
rally!), an incident

recorded
on the photoblog

Zombietime
. But he put aside the bomb-thrower
persona to play the genial MC at the culminating panel
of A-listers on the final night.

Another person of disrepute was Parvez Ahmed, if only
because of his position as the Chairman of the Board for
the

Council for American Islamic Relations
(CAIR), an
organization that has seen

several of its high-ranking officials
prosecuted and
imprisoned for terrorism. He has personally suggested
that

SLAPP lawsuits would result
if anyone spoke ill of
CAIR. His remarks at the wrap-up session were a boring
recitation of CAIR-gathered statistics to portray
Muslims residing in the US as successful high-achievers
who nevertheless suffer from the indignities foisted
upon them by cruel redneck Americans who don`t celebrate
diversity.

In fact, FBI data published in 2007 show that

hate crimes
against Muslims have fallen sharply. But
facts were in short supply while the conference
positioned "Islamophobia" as a new academic discipline.
"Placing Islamophobia within the context of ethnic
studies would allow researchers to look more broadly at
the confluence of race, culture, ethnicity and religion
that define the American Muslim experience today,"
according to the San Francisco Chronicle`s backgrounder
on the conference (Looking
at people`s phobia of Muslims
by Matthai
Kuruvila, April 16, 2008).

It`s infuriating to see a taxpayer-supported state
university being used as a propaganda tool by the
Islamic fifth column. The academic world leans left in
its politics, but what I heard was worse—poisonous
rhetoric, designed to undergird an angry fifth column in
the U.S.

And this was an open forum. You have to wonder what
these people say when the public is not invited.

As scholar

Daniel Pipes
recently remarked at a

talk
I attended at Berkeley, the alliance of the
academic left and Islamists has big payoffs for both:
the left gets to recruit from an expanded pool of
well-educated young people who despise America, and the
Muslims glean the legitimacy of the university.

If the shock troops for global authoritarian Islam
were smart, they would continue walking through the open
door that universities willingly offer. The welcome mat
is out for America-haters with PhDs who can talk the
talk. Well-paying careers are available to glib Muslims
who can peddle totalitarian values in the guise of
multiculturalism. And we citizens are fools to allow our
universities to be used to undermine the American
nation.

Brenda Walker (email
her) lives in Northern California and publishes two
websites,

LimitsToGrowth.org
and

ImmigrationsHumanCost.org
. She is happy to have had
an old-fashioned American liberal-arts education where
she wasn`t forced to celebrate diversity.