Amnesty For Illegals Still Under Bush`s Blanket

[VDARE.COM UPDATE:
The Christmas spirit has apparently inspired the
Administration and the WSJ Edit Page to give away
the country.

The Journal struck
first, with a Christmas Eve editorial attacking the
"restrictionist right,"
(us) whom they call a
"loud minority."
(Polls show that a


majority of the American people

think of immigration as a "critical threat;" we`re
a minority only on


Wall Street
.) The Wall
Street Journal
says that "An immigration reform
would help millions of families, tens of thousands of
American businesses, as well as U.S. national security.

[Immigration
and Security |Tom Ridge rebuts the restrictionist right
,
Opinionjournal.com
,
December 24]

Note that the “millions
of families”
it would help are illegal foreigners,
the Americans it would help are businessmen numbered in
the tens of thousands. Nothing is said about  the
millions of ordinary Americans it would harm,(
taxpayers,

workers
,

crime victims,
etc.) although the only way mass
immigration helps businesses is by lowering the


cost of labor
;
which is the same as lowering the price of labor,
i.e.


wages
.

Meanwhile, back at the
Beltway, Bush aides were telling the Washington Post
that Bush means to make immigration “reform,”
meaning amnesty, part of his re-election
campaign!

“But presidential advisers
said they believe that


Hispanic voters
, one of the targets for Bush`s
reelection campaign, will give him credit for pushing
for the changes even if nothing is enacted before the
election.”
[Immigration
Reform on Bush Agenda
,
By Mike Allen,
Washington Post
, December 24, 2003]

It`s likely that these ideas
are being floated on Christmas Eve in the hope they`ll
be buried in the Christmas rush. But look for them to
reemerge in the New Year. We`ll be waiting.]

Something funny is going on inside
the Bush administration on the issue of

mass immigration
and

what to do about it
.

A couple of weeks ago, Homeland
Security Secretary Tom Ridge

muttered
some cryptic, unrehearsed and rather
ambiguous noises that sounded like an endorsement of
amnesty for illegals. His spokesmen immediately

denied
that amnesty was what he meant.

A few days later, the Washington
Times


reported,
"The White House yesterday said a new
immigration review is underway that could lead to
amnesty for millions of illegal aliens living and
working in the United States."

Last week the same paper quoted

President Bush himself,
still chortling over the
nabbing of Saddam Hussein, that "This administration
is firmly against blanket amnesty."

So what exactly is going on? It`s
not clear that even those in the administration who are
making it go know what it is, but my own bet, hunch,
educated guess, or wild surmise is that for

all the denials of amnesty,
amnesty of some kind is
what is

going on
and is what we will eventually get.

It is indisputable that before the
9/11 attacks, amnesty was being peddled by the
president, Secretary of State Colin Powell and Attorney
General John Ashcroft. The plan was to allow some 3
million illegal Mexican aliens in the country to apply
for permanent residency. This was not called amnesty
either, and certainly not "blanket amnesty," but
rather by the

brazenly mendacious
name of a

"temporary workers plan."

Since it offered permanent legal
status to illegal aliens, there was nothing
"temporary"
about it whatsoever. It was amnesty
under

another name.

So when Mr. Bush pronounces with a
straight face that he is "firmly against blanket
amnesty,"
he is probably telling something like the
truth. Mr. Bush and the rest of the administration know
that "blanket amnesty" would be as suicidal
politically as it would be for the nation. Therefore,
what you do is resurrect the amnesty plan under another
name—smuggle it in under the blanket, as it were. The
whole art of democratic politics consists largely of
selling unpopular ideas

under another name.

What the president did suggest last
week was a vague statement that "we need to have an
immigration policy that helps match any willing employer
with any willing employee."
In other words, the main
problem for Mr. Bush seems to be an economic one, rather
than political or cultural.

Moreover, as with the old
"temporary workers plan,"
if illegal aliens have or
can get

jobs
with

American employers
, then they would be eligible for
legal residency. It`s not "blanket amnesty"
because it does require some conditions for becoming
legal, but it is still very clearly amnesty because it
makes legal what is illegal.

It`s also a bad idea that merely
recapitulates all that is wrong with amnesty period,
blanket or under the blanket.

Amnesty under any terms

rewards illegal activity
and

encourages more of it
.

Amnesty under any terms insults and
creates disincentives for law-abiding conduct.

Amnesty under any terms makes such
ideals as the rule of law and the enforcement of law

a sick joke
, a joke that in the midst of the
ballyhoo about the

"war on terrorism"
is not at all funny.

Moreover, as happened during the
discussion of the

temporary workers plan
, the limited amnesty the
administration and some congressional allies are pushing
won`t stay limited. In 2001 the Democrats denounced Mr.
Bush`s plan as discriminatory against

non-Mexican illegals
and proposed their own amnesty
for all illegal aliens—some 12 million people.

That remains the position of all
the Democratic presidential candidates. It`s also the
logical step once the acceptability of any amnesty for
any group has been granted, and there`s no reason to
think it wouldn`t be adopted sooner or later.

If Mr. Bush, Mr. Ridge and other
administration leaders really favor serious immigration
reform, they need to forget about amnesty of any kind.
They need to consider that massive illegal immigration
is not only a threat to the integrity of the nation
itself and its citizenry but also a physical threat to
the nation`s security, and they need to treat illegal
immigration not as a

sensitive political problem
to be massaged with

euphemisms
or an economic problem for

American businessmen
or a

diplomatic bargaining chip
with Mexico but as a
problem of

national security
and

law enforcement.

Having created the massive
Department of Homeland Security under Mr. Ridge and
enacted stringent legislation in the Patriot Act and
similar laws to protect our security, the administration
should start thinking about the most effective way to
stop or drastically reduce illegal immigration now and
in the future and how to

apprehend
and

return
the millions of illegals who are already
here.

That—not amnesty and not fake

"reform"
—is what we need.

COPYRIGHT

CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.

[Sam Francis [email
him] is a nationally syndicated columnist. A selection
of his columns,

America Extinguished: Mass Immigration And The
Disintegration Of American Culture
, is now available
from

Americans For Immigration Control.

Click here
for Sam Francis` website.


Click

here
to order his monograph
,
Ethnopolitics: Immigration, Race, and the American
Political Future and
here for
Glynn Custred`s review.
]