Sellout Senate Welcoming New Immigrant Overlords!Help VDARE.com Get The Word OutSteve Sailer wrote in 2006 an article that seems especially relevant this week: So the only possible response for Republican politicians, they suggest, is to preemptively surrender to Hispanics by letting in even more of their relatives before they start voting against us in truly huge numbers. Where we have heard this logic before?  Oh, yes, in the 1994 "Deep Space Homer" episode of The Simpsons. Airhead newscaster Kent Brockman, mistakenly convinced that Earth is about to be conquered by "a master race of giant space ants," famously announces: "[Grimly] One thing is for certain: there is no stopping them; the ants will soon be here. [Suddenly ingratiating] And I for one welcome our new insect overlords. I'd like to remind them that as a trusted TV personality, I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their underground sugar caves." By Peter Brimelow Scroll to end for tonight's posting... [Tonight! Guzzardi's View From Lodi On Bush's Amnesty, and a Guzzardi Exclusive On Cardinal Mahony And La Raza, while in Today's Letter, A Hostile Reader Gloats About The Sellout.] SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT: click here for news on how to get the new hard-copy compendium of the best of VDARE.COM It’s five months since our last fund-raising appeal. Which is not, goodness knows, because we don’t need the money. We are determined to keep paying our writers, albeit modestly, because we know it makes all the difference in the world—witness the many excellent blogs that have stopped posting in the last year or so because their writers burned out. And, although many of you responded generously to our Christmas appeal, we did have extra expenses in the shape of the prolonged illness of a key member of our team, Joe Guzzardi, (He’s out of hospital now, fortunately, and recuperating). But I’ve delayed launching this first fund-raising appeal of 2007—partly because, well, I just don’t like doing it. Plus there’s always so much to write about—I just hate to take the spotlight off the issue of America’s immigration disaster even for a moment—even to raise the money that’s necessary to keep that spotlight shining. For example, when I started writing this appeal, I was distracted by President Bush’s weekly radio address. He was touting his surge—not the troop surge in Iraq, but the other surge, the immigration surge he has been working to achieve since he got into office. Republicans and Democrats have been negotiating this latest attempt for months—in secret, unusually, a sure sign that they fear popular outrage. Debate is scheduled to start in the Senate this week. It’s fascinating to see how this popular outrage is forcing the President dissimulate about what he’s trying to do—emphasizing border security, workplace verification and assimilation. Of course, there are all things Bush could and should have done something about at any point in his six years in office. But his dissimulation is the homage that vice pays to virtue—popular, patriotic outrage. And at VDARE.COM we pride ourselves on playing a part in stimulating and shaping that outrage. But President Bush remains fanatical about his obsessions: a “temporary worker” program (“to fill jobs that Americans aren’t doing”) and amnesty (which as usual he says is not amnesty) for illegals (whom he estimates at 12 million, although we’ve published credible estimates they may number 20 million. The scandalous truth is that nobody knows how many there are, but Bush wants to amnesty them all anyway). Much of what we do at VDARE.COM is frame questions that Americans can ask when confronted with such Bush-type bafflegab. So instead of writing this appeal, what I really want to do is blog as follows:
I believe that ideas have consequences. To the extent Americans are aware of these questions, they will see through the Bush-Pelosi immigration One of the gratifying developments in the years I have been running VDARE.COM is to see the number of times questions we raise, like the ones I’ve just outlined, show up in the discussion threads that Mainstream Media outlets are now obliged to run after their rah-rah immigration stories. Americans have an increasingly sophisticated awareness of what their ruling class is doing to them—and of how false its arguments are. It is because of this increasing American awareness that immigration enthusiasts, like President Bush, are obliged to disguise their proposals as “immigration reform”—rather than “immigration expansion” or “immigration capitulation”—and to lie about whether their amnesty is, in fact, an amnesty. It is because of this American awareness that the drive to expand immigration has repeatedly been derailed over the last six years—and, hopefully, will be again. But it takes money to develop these questions—and it takes money to spread the word, even on the internet. Perhaps the questions we asked that have gotten us most attention since our last appeal are the ones we asked after the shootings at Virginia Tech. In the MSM, this has been spun as “An American Tragedy” and a case study in the need for gun control. At VDARE.COM, we pointed out that this was really an immigration tragedy—shooter Seung-Hui Cho came from Korea in 1992, although tellingly he never took out U.S. citizenship or even Americanized his name—and a case study in the need for immigration control. But when we first wrote in the hours after the killings, a google search revealed 45,000 stories mentioning “Virginia Tech” and “gun control”—but only 230 mentioning “Virginia Tech” and “Immigration Control”, most of them random junk. As I write this on May 14, there are no less than 826,000 stories mentioning “Virginia Tech” and “gun control”!—and just 604 mentioning “Virginia Tech” and “Immigration Control”. I am happy to say the top two stories on “Virginia Tech” and “Immigration Control” are both from VDARE.COM. I’ve been a professional journalist for thirty-five years. But even I am shocked by this astounding imbalance. The more so because, in the days after the shootings, we at VDARE.COM were able to document literally dozens of similar killings by immigrants in the last thirty years, including several on campuses and one—at Case Western Reserve University in 2003—that eerily foreshadowed Virginia Tech, but was mercifully cut short when police shot the perpetrator, an Indian immigrant. We call it “Immigrant Mass Murder Syndrome”. It’s not even that difficult to understand. As our Brenda Walker wrote, wisely and compassionately: “The media chatter constantly about how wonderful diversity is and ignore the stress of adjusting to a different society. Immigrants are expected to be happy and grateful, while many are not. Stress is cumulative, and when the difficulties of cultural adjustment are piled on top of the normal problems of young adulthood, some may explode.” But in the Mainstream Media there is literally no mention of these facts, or of this analysis. This is not just a debating point. Americans will die because of it. I will mention just one other question we regularly ask at VDARE.COM because it appeals to me as a financial journalist: who is getting the jobs? Every month, the federal government publishes employment statistics. But it takes work to figure out whether immigrants or Americans are getting the new jobs. The government, as usual, doesn’t make it easy. You won’t hear about it in the MSM. But our Ed Rubenstein does that work, and has develped what we call VDARE.COM’s American Worker Displacement Index—VDAWDI. We report on VDAWDI regularly. In April, all categories of workers lost ground—but Hispanics (a proxy for immigrants) lost least. Since Bush’s inauguration, non-Hispanic employment has made virtually no gains. But Hispanic employment has risen by more than a quarter. More than half of all new jobs have been captured by Hispanics. Our research also points to the reason: Hispanics are systematically lower-paid. Hispanics in particular, and immigrants in general, are simply displacing Americans in the workforce at a remarkable pace. The facts are there. Eventually, the issue will get into politics and you will read about it in the Mainstream Media. But right now, the only place you can find this reporting is in VDARE.COM We need your help to keep VDARE.COM going. Please give generously. Help us develop the ideas that will save America.
Peter Brimelow SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT: The current issue of the quarterly magazine The Social Contract, entitled “Mass Immigration and The National Question”, is entirely devoted to reprinting a selection of VDARE.COM articles. It includes my Vanderbilt University address “Borders, Walls, Nation-States and Property Rights” and “Time To Rethink Immigration II”, my update of my 1992 National Review cover story written as the Senate passed the disastrous S.2611 bill last year. Other VDARE.COM writers include Bryanna Bevens, Donald A. Collins, Marcus Epstein, James Fulford, Peter Gadiel, Dave Gorak, Joe Guzzardi, Edwin S. Rubenstein, Steve Sailer, Linda Thom, Brenda Walker, Allan Wall, David Yeagley. Ideal for reading in bed or for spreading the word to internet-challenged friends! To receive the special VDARE.COM issue of The Social Contract with a donation of $50.00, please email office@vdare.com specifying that you would like this gift and giving us the mailing address you would like it sent to. Also available: 3 copies for a $75 donation or 5 for $100.
BREAKING NEWS: Our advisers tell me I should offer to come to any U.S, city to speak at a private dinner in your place of choice for a donation of $10,000. Please write us at office@vdare.com NOTE: VDARE.COM is no longer associated with the Center For American Unity, which plans to focus on litigation. We are grateful for their past help and wish them well in future. Our sponsor is now the VDARE Foundation, a 501(c)(3) charity. [For tonight's postings click here.] |
