Anyway, federal law does not permit Gitmo terrorists to be released into the country, so the peaceniks didnt really have to worry about any genuinely dangerous people being added to the reprobate Berkeley criminal class.
But the vote indicated that the city leadership is not completely insane. We have low expectations in blue states.
They are dumb as rocks, these peace-and-love types:
Berkeley votes against welcoming Gitmo detainees, Associated Press, February 16, 2011
The Berkeley city council, known for its forays into international affairs, has narrowly rejected a measure that would have welcomed freed Guantanamo Bay detainees to resettle in this California college town.
The resolution would have asked Congress to allow Guantanamo prisoners who have been cleared of wrongdoing to resettle in the U.S. â€” and invited one or two of them to live in Berkeley.
The measure lost in a 4-1 vote, with four abstentions, late Tuesday.
At least two other U.S. cities â€” Amherst and Leverett in Massachusetts â€” have approved similar resolutions aimed at clearing the way for Guantanamo detainees to come the U.S. after their release from the American detention facility in Cuba.
These men have suffered immensely, said Cynthia Papermaster, who heads Berkeley No More Guantanamos. Its the right thing for all U.S. citizens to say, Were sorry for what happened to you. If you want to come here, we have a place for you.
Papermaster, a Berkeley resident who asked the councils Peace and Justice Commission to consider the measure, said former detainees would be sponsored by volunteers and nonprofit groups, and no city money would be used to support them. [. . .]
The resolution singled out two Guantanamo detainees who have been cleared of wrongdoing but dont want to return to their home countries because they fear persecution â€” Ravil Mingazov, a Russian ballet dancer, and Djamel Ameziane, an Algerian chef.
Perfect! A ballet dancer and a chef were probably the most Berkeley-appropriate terrorists the peaceniks could dig up.