Sam Francis: The Unfinished Book

[Recently by Dr. Ken Dombey:

Multiculturalism And Medicine: A Deadly Combination

I don`t know exactly why I did it.
I had never met or corresponded with the man before. But
somewhere on the late Sam Francis` computer is my
unopened email wishing a speedy recovery from thoracic
surgery. He

died the next day
, February 15, 2005.

Reading I came to realize
the importance of Dr. Francis` ideas. Since his death I
have been haunted by the news that he planned to begin
an important book—a book about the role of

race in culture
—now left for someone else to write.

So I scoured his columns to see
what might have been the crux of his argument and came
across this profound quote which got me thinking:

"Breaking down the sexual barriers between the races is
a major weapon of cultural destruction because it means
the dissolution of the cultural boundaries that define
breeding and the family and, ultimately, the
transmission and survival of the culture itself."
Not The Only Target on Monday Night Football

November 26, 2004 ]

And this really is our problem.
Isn`t it?

Traditional Americans truly believe
in ideals such as


. These concepts are an integral part of our
culture. But there is a conflict between believing in
abstract universal truths and embracing a

universal society
, because of the constraints
necessary to ensure passing on ideas through time.
Unless a functional cultural unit is maintained, which
in part is derived from strategic breeding rules, then
ideas will likely be

and lost.

Is this why America has appeared to
have a double standard from the very beginning? Our

Founding Fathers
often spoke in universal language
but really only practiced their beliefs within the
context of European descendants. Thomas Jefferson

"all men are created equal"
and then
called Indians "savages"
in the very same
document. (He also cited as a grievance that Britain had
ignored America`s pleas for justice despite

"common blood"
and "consanguinity".
 Although certainly relevant, I must defer Jefferson`s
shocking, shocking acknowledgment of this higher
law for another essay, another time.) 

We have all heard

ad nauseum
about the victimization of



etc. The left has bludgeoned traditional
Americans with the

of not living up to our noble universal

But today the natural law
premise that "all men are created equal" has been
transformed by cultural Marxism into the

messianic theme of diversity

And diversity has formed the wedge

that threatens to

break apart America,

, and their ideas.

It is obvious that the Founding
Fathers knew better than to travel down this road. But,
unfortunately, they did not leave us with a rigorous
defense of their position.

In his

remarkable book
on David Hume,

Philosophical Melancholy and Delirium
Donald Livingston describes the trap in which we have

According to Dr. Livingston`s
interpretation of

, the true philosopher—and also
civilization—mediates beliefs through custom. The false
philosopher—and also barbarism—tries but ultimately
fails to transcend culture with abstractions.

My favorite quote from Hume in the
book: "Be a philosopher; but amidst all of your
philosophy, be still a man."

But Dr. Livingston (more precisely,
David Hume) leaves alone the vexing problem of race and
its role in culture. Adam Bellow`s
In Praise of Nepotism

closer to addressing it

According to Bellow, ethnic
nepotism has historically been important to cultural
achievement. In fact, he claims it is the
"bedrock of social existence"
.  He maintains,
however, that long-term cultural success must strike a
balance between not being overly exclusive nor too

Bellow then goes on, seemingly at
odds with his thesis, to suggest that America should no
longer exclude any group (specifically blacks) from its
nepotistic network. I infer from this that he recognizes
that America has historically employed a (successful)
nepotistic strategy of incorporating predominately
European immigrants.

Bellow`s book is very insightful
but ultimately supports the perpetrators of diversity
and the destruction of America. He

wants to
"expand our definition of the national
Does he ignore his
own warning that: "nepotism,

practiced badly,
mainly ends up hurting those
directly involved?"

(Of note: Steve Sailer`s

review for
offers no such criticism of
In Praise of Nepotism.
 I guess in Steve`s "citizenist"
model the entire country would strive to shine like the
state with the highest

white/black admixture
—Louisiana! Pre-Katrina,
of course.)

It seems to me that the social
sciences need a grand unifying theory, reconciling the
cultural need to believe in universal principles with
the reality that

rules provide for the fragile health of
all cultures, including our own. (I recommend, in this

Richard Weaver`
s book

Visions of Order

This is what is necessary to regain
the moral high ground from the destructive left—and to
replace the

ineffectual right

Tragically, I can only guess that
this is what Sam Francis had planned for his book.

Ken Dombey [email
him] is a practicing internist.

Francis was not spared to write his book, but he did
edit a collection of essays, including work by

Kevin Lamb,

Richard Lynn
Kevin MacDonald

Jared Taylor
, and

Marian Kester Coombs
, which will be published by the

National Policy Institute
under the title

Race And The American Prospect

in early 2006.