Default
School Shootings And Alienation
Default author
May 04, 2007, 04:57 PM
A+
|
a-
Print Friendly and PDF

The peak of the “baby boom”, was 1955. Folks born between 1933-1955 came of age in a situation in which there were consistently more younger people than older people in communities in America as a whole.

By 1977, this changed on college campuses in the US, Canada and Australia. All but a few of those born before the peak of the boom were gone from campuses. In this situation, we saw a new type of crime emerge: the campus killing.

1

April 5, 1982Hot Springs, AK, USAKelvin LoveGarland County Community College1
December 17, 1983Ithaca, NY,USASu Yong KimCornell University2immigrant
December 6, 1989Montreal, CanadaMarc LépineÉcole Polytechnique14son of immigrant
November 1, 1991Iowa City, IA, USAGang Lu6immigrant
August 24, 1992Montreal, Quebec, CanadaValery FabrikantConcordia University4immigrant
December 14, 1992Great Barrington, MA, USAWayne LoSimon’s Rock College of Bard2immigrant
September 17, 1996University Park, PA, USAJillian RobbinsPennsylvania State University1
October 16, 1996West Lafayette, IA, USAAllen EskewPurdue University1
January 16, 2002Grundy, Virginia, USAPeter OdighizuwaAppalachian School of Law3immigrant
October 21, 2002Melbourne, AustraliaHuan Xiang Monash University2immigrant
October 28, 2002Tucson, Arizona, USARobert J. Flores, Jr.,University of Arizona3
May 9, 2003Cleveland, Ohio, USABiswanath HalderCase Western Reserve University1immigrant
September 3, 2006Shepherdstown, WV, USADouglas W. PenningtonShepherd University2
September 13, 2006Montreal, Quebec, CanadaKimveer Gill,The Dawson College,
April 16, 2007Blacksburg, Virginia, USACho Seung-huiVirginia Tech30immigrant

8 of these 15 killers were immigrants. One of the exceptions was the son on a Algerian immigrant who spent most of his early childhood outside of Canada. About 6 of these shooters were Asian men-the exceptions were either from Montreal(an unusual city compared to the rest of the English speaking world and an older, African immigrant, another was from Russia).The Wikipedia list included two other killings that were outside the English Speaking world-but it isn’t clear this is a comprehensive list.

This raises the question of what was going on here? The question most likely lies in economics.Specifically the economics that are of directly concern to college students. Few college students have huge levels of discretionary income-many are dependent on families or grants to get through school.However, demographics have a profound difference in what their social opportunities are like. Since 1955, we saw a situation in which social pressures changed.Specifically after 1977. we saw a situation in which there were generally more older students relative to younger students in the campus. Is the rise of campus shootings during that period a coincidence or is it related to that demographic shift?

Why is it that we see immigrants and Asian men so highly represented among campus killers?

In “What makes a Mass Killer” two psychiatrist discuss how isolation and alienation are major contributing factors in triggering
homicides. It is easy to expect that immigrants might be selected from a population of those most unhappy with their original homes. Why are Asians so heavily represented here? On the whole, Asians are a fairly “successful” and law-abiding group by most superficial standards. However, when we look at statistics of inter-racial marriages and births, we tend to see that Asian men are less likely to inter-marry than Asian women. That suggests that we have a population of relatively isolated Asian men in the US.

Now, there are probably reasons why campus killings are different than the killings in other parts of society. On the whole, college campuses are still remarkably safe. Still, tendency of one group to be more likely to be “driven over the edge”suggests that the “politically correct” culture of academe isn’t as racially neutral as its participants would like to represent themselves as being.

I would also suggest that these statistics negatively reflect on the selection process currently being used to screen US immigrants. On the whole,the US needs fewer immigrants and there should be better protections in place to make sure that those immigrants that are admitted are the ones the US needs–and can be provided a decent life once they are here.