It was disappointing, although not entirely surprising to read President Trump’s disinterest in limiting legal immigration, as remarked in a May 11 Economist interview
and quoted by Mark Krikorian here
Do you want to curb legal immigration?
Oh sure, you know, I want to stop illegal immigration.And what about legal immigration? Do you want to cut the number of immigrants?
Oh legal, no, no, no. I want people to come into the country legally. No, legally? No. I want people to come in legally. But I want people to come in on merit. I want to go to a merit-based system. Actually two countries that have very strong systems are Australia and Canada. And I like those systems very much, they’re very strong, they’re very good, I like them very much. We’re going to a much more merit-based system. But I absolutely want talented people coming in, I want people that are going to love our country coming in, I want people that are going to contribute to our country coming in. We want a provision at the right time, we want people that are coming in and will commit to not getting…not receiving any form of subsidy to live in our country for at least a five-year period.But the numbers of those people could be as high as the numbers that are coming in legally now? You’re not looking to reduce the numbers?
Oh yeah, no, no, no, no, we want people coming in legally. No, very strongly. Now they’re going to be much more strongly vetted as you see. You know, we’ve broken the all-time record [of detentions at the border] by many times, 73, we’re up to 73, it’s going to go up to almost 80% at the border, we’ve…you know, really stopped it. We also want farm workers to be able to come in. You know, we’re going to have work visas for the farm workers. If you look, you know we have a lot of people coming through the border, they’re great people and they work on the farms and then they go back home. We like those people a lot and we want them to continue to come in.
The comments of President Trump were foreshadowed by his Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin’s declaration
in March that automation’s threat to American jobs
was “not even on our radar screen … 50-100 more years.” President Trump has spoken often about globalization as the source of job loss
without mention of automation. That ignorance is concerning.Below, automobile manufacturing once employed millions of Americans, but no longer, since the robots arrived.
Mnuchin’s opinion is not shared by many tech and robot experts, who believe that a substantial portion of US jobs could be automated within a couple decades. The big picture of employment is indeed sobering. Oxford researchers forecast in 2013 that nearly half of American jobs were vulnerable
to machine or software replacement within 20 years. Rice University computer scientist Moshe Vardi believes that in 30 years
humans will become largely obsolete, and world joblessness will reach 50 percent. The Gartner tech advising company believes that one-third of jobs will be done by machines by 2025
. Forrester Research Inc. has a more optimistic view, that there will be a net job loss of 7 percent by 2025
from automation. The recent PwC forecast was only slightly less severe
than the Oxford numbers.
Even the most upbeat forecast reveals the foolishness of continuing to import large numbers of immigrants as workers because they are not needed now and will be even more unemployable in coming years. A growing community of angry, jobless foreigners does not sound like a recipe for domestic peace and tranquility.
In addition, overpopulated
California dodged a bullet by having a very rainy winter in 2016-17
that ended a disastrous drought
that I suspect was worse than authorities were willing to admit. The state experienced severe mega-droughts from 900-1400
which is quite recent in climate terms, and there is no guarantee that similar droughts won’t recur.California’s Lake Oroville was almost dry in September 2014.
What happens in a modern society when a region runs out of water and millions need to relocate? Certainly in the west, water supply must be considered before inviting millions more immigrants to come live in America.
The automated, potentially drought-plagued future strongly suggests that immigration is an institution that needs to be retired for the good of all Americans.