I wrote about this in tonight`s appeal,
but that will go away, especially if you nice people donate enough money. National Review
has just run an editorial in favor of sanctuary cities, [Sanctuary Sanctimony
, November 28, 2007] calling the pro-illegal policy
that Giuliani defended all the way to the Supreme Court "sensible ""humane"
This is why VDARE.com is importantâ€”we can count on the New York Times
to be for Giuliani when he`s supporting illegal immigration, just as we can count on them to be against him when he puts actual criminals in jail.
But National Review
was supposed to be differentâ€”on the issue of sanctuary for illegals, they should be standing athwart Giuliani yelling stop. They aren`t.
Here`s a hot flash for the Editors of National Review
â€”Giuliani wasn`t for sanctuary because he`s "sensible ""humane"
He`s actually none of those things. He was for sanctuary
because he likes illegal aliens. If Giuliani gets elected, the push for amnesty will be back on, and he`ll roll over for it. His famous tough-on-crimeness won`t be in evidence at the border, let alone in interior enforcement, because he doesnâ€™t really think of illegal immigration as a crime.
So if, thanks to NR
, he gets elected it will be too late to do anything about it.