Mark steyn1
Like Phyllis Schlafly, Mark Steyn Grasps The Significance Of Trump
Thumb nachman
July 15, 2015, 07:20 PM
A+
|
a-
Print Friendly and PDF
Yesterday, I pointed VDARE.com readers to conservative founder Phyllis Schlafly's cogent piece about the importance of Donald Trump's noisy campaign for president.

A few days earlier, broad-spectrum commentator Mark Steyn ("the one-man global content provider") had weighed in with a blunt appraisal of what Trump's been doing, concluding that, in an overall dismal scene, it's for the best.  His observations in Last Stand of the Old White Males (July 10, 2015) complement Schlafly's and are worth quoting at length:

Trump is the only one who's introduced an issue into this otherwise torpid campaign - and the most important issue of all, I would argue, in that ultimately it's one of national survival.  And so the same media that dismiss Trump as an empty reality-show vanity candidate are now denouncing him for bringing up the only real policy question in the race so far.

What he said may or may not be offensive, but it happens to be true: America has more Mexicans than anybody needs, and then some. It certainly has more unskilled Mexicans than any country needs, including countries whose names begin with "Mex-" and end in "-ico". And it has far more criminal Mexicans than anybody needs, which is why they make up 71 per cent of the foreign inmates in federal jails. Just to underline that last point, a young American woman was murdered for kicks in a supposed "sanctuary city" on the eve of the holiday weekend by an illegal immigrant from Mexico. He had flouted US immigration law for years - or, to be more precise about it, local, state and federal officials had colluded with him in the flouting of US immigration law, to the point where San Francisco's sheriff actively demanded the return of this criminal to his "sanctuary city", thereby facilitating the homicide of an actual citizen, taxpayer and net contributor to American society.

This would be quite an interesting topic to air in a US election campaign, don't you think? Certainly, a segment of voters seems to be interested in it. But bigshot media like NBC and Univision and craphole emporia like Macy's are telling Trump and everybody else: you can't even bring this up; this is beyond discussion. The "acceptable" Republican candidates are now obliged to denounce the guy who mentioned the unmentionable: "Will you distance yourself from Trump's controversial remarks? Do you agree such views have no place in your party?"

In endorsing Ann Coulter's essential new book, Steyn went on to reinforce the point that Trump is rejuvenating our straitjacketed, atrophied national conversation:
As Ann Coulter's new book Adios, America! lays out in remorseless detail, Kate Steinle is dead because the entire Democratic Party, two-thirds of the Republican Party and 100 per cent of the diseased federal-state-municipal bureaucracy prioritizes myths over reality. Yes, it's distressing to persons of taste and discrimination that the only person willing to address that reality is Donald Trump. But that's because he's not the reality-show freak here. The fake-o lame-o reality freakshow is the political pseudo-campaign being waged within the restraints demanded by the media and Macy's. So, if Donald Trump is the only guy willing to bust beyond those bounds, we owe him a debt of gratitude. If, as Karl Rove proposes, other candidates are able to talk about the subject in a more "inclusive" way, so be it. But, if "inclusive" is code for not addressing it at all, nuts to that.
Steyn retains his Canadian citizenship and lives close enough to the international border in northern New Hampshire that he can make a run for it if life in the U.S. goes south in a hurry.  Often enough, he provides examples of why that's not fantasy (see, e.g., here), and some of that theme — the ruin of the American nation — also appears in the article about Trump:
The Donald is not really a conservative, nor much of a Republican. He's given more or less evenhandedly to both parties over the decades, because, at Trump's level, that's just the price of doing business in a sclerotic and corrupt republic. [emphasis added] The Clintons attended one of his weddings, because, for New York operators, that's like the King of Spain attending the Prince of Wales' wedding: it's just A-list power-schmoozing.

...

Yet Trump, like other philosophically erratic politicians from Denmark to Greece, has tapped into a very basic strain of cultural conservatism: the question of how far First World peoples are willing to go in order to extinguish their futures on the altar of "diversity".

The question Steyn raises in that last sentence is what's known at VDARE.com as "The National Question."