Iâ€™ve run out of patience with tired memes and discredited claims by fools and partisan.The rhetoric of those pushing nonsense on the public in an attempt to confuse rather than illuminate â€” the phrase is â€?agnotologyâ€? â€“ only serves to aid the lobbyists working on behalf of the Banks and Investment houses to maintain the status quo.All is well, nothing to see here, move along.Well, its time to put up or shut up: I hereby challenge any of those who believe the CRA [Community Reinvestment Act] is at prime fault in the housing boom and collapse, and economic morass we are in to a debate. The question for debate: â€?Is the CRA significantly to blame for the credit crisis?â€?A mutually agreed upon time and place, outcome determined by a fair jury, for any dollar amount between $10,000 up to $100,000 dollars (i.e., for more than just bragging rights).The nonsense rhetoric blogged about has no cost to those pushing these discredited memes â€” but interferes in the societal attempts to understand how these problems arose and then how to fix them. Perhaps this will help clarify the issue by forcing those with partisan agendas to stand behind their claims.Which of the many â€?CRA was a major factorâ€? proponents have the courage of their conviction to step forward?
I would certainly debate him on the topic "Diversity was a major factor in the mortgage meltdown."
Heck, I`d do it for free.Right here, Barry.