October 19, 2005
Homeland Security’s Misplaced Faith in Religious Visas
Tony Blair knows it.
Joe Guzzardi knows it. Most Americans feel it’s
true:
Muslim clerics are more likely to promote
terrorist activity than any other immigrant group
living in western countries.
Yet Imams
coming to these shores are treated no differently
than
foreign-born priests,
Buddhist monks, or
Rabbis – all of whom enter the country on R-1 visas
for religious workers.
Homeland Security treats them all as if they were
the lowest of threats, waiving fingerprinting and other
security procedures when airport lines are too long.
[Paul Sperry,
Infiltration]
Since 9/11 religious
workers and their family members have entered in record
numbers: (Table 1)
Rounding
out the top ten source countries are the U.K., Korea,
Israel, Japan, Philippines, Argentina, and Colombia.
It’s
clear that the overwhelming number of R-1 visas have
gone to foreign-born Christian (primarily Catholic),
Jewish, and Asian religious workers. The Asians might
legitimately claim to need immigrants to sustain their
religious traditions. For churches and synagogues,
however, the visas represent
easy absolution for their
inability to persuade
U.S. natives to
pursue religious careers.
Legitimate or not, the sheer volume of R-1 entrants has
overwhelmed Homeland Security’s ability to properly vet
them. Americans concerned about the war on terrorism
will be particularly alarmed at the trend of religious
workers from the Middle-east and heavily Moslem
countries: (Table 3):
R-1
visas were created as a temporary expedient for what was
considered a short run shortage. They are still
“temporary” visas, limiting the holder to a 2 year stint
in the U.S. In reality, most visa holders have no
intention of going home.
Perhaps
the most
infamous R-1 abuser was Sheikh Omar Abdul Rahman,
the Egyptian cleric who masterminded the
1993 World Trade Center bombing. This June two R-1
visa recipients running a Muslim “religious school” in
Lodi, California were accused of sending their
“graduates” to Al Qaeda training camps in Pakistan. [See
Joe Guzzardi’s VDARE.com column of
June 17, 2005]
Al Qaeda
sleeper cells are financed in part by millions of
dollars raised by an extensive network of
bogus religious charities and foundations, according
to the FBI and other federal authorities. Mosques are
regularly used as safe havens for potential
terrorists.
From its
inception the
R-1 visa program has been riddled with fraud. In
1997 the State Department wrote Congressman Lamar Smith,
warning that the Department had:
“…uncovered a troubling
number of scams, both individual and organized, seeking
to exploit this category to obtain immigration benefits
illegally….[Most] problematic are those cases that
involve organized fraud rings in which documents of
religious institutions in the U.S. are fabricated, or
when the applicant colludes with a member of a religious
institution to misrepresent either his or her
qualifications, or the position to which the applicant
is destined.” [Statement
of Chairman Lamar Smith, Oversight Hearing on
Evaluating the Religious Worker Visa Program,
Subcommittee on Immigration and Claims House Judiciary
Committee, June 29, 2000.]
A
subsequent GAO report found that neither INS nor State
Department officials were confident that their screening
process was good at identifying bogus applicants or
sponsoring organizations. [VISA
ISSUANCE: Issues Concerning The Religious Visa Program,
March 1999 (PDF)]
In 2000
Congress debated whether to allow the sunset provisions
in the original R-1 legislation to take effect. Instead
it passed the (I kid you not)
“Mother Teresa Religious Workers Act,” extending the
visa.
That was
before
9/11.
Could
things be even worse today? Definitely. And pressure to
expand the R-1 program further will likely come from
Christians and
Jews more than from Moslems.
Edwin S. Rubenstein (email
him) is President of
ESR Research Economic Consultants in Indianapolis.