Is Statistical Reasoning Just Too Novel For Contemporary Humans?

In a post below, I quote a bit from David Brooks of what is considered sophisticated modern thought. As an example of “serious discrimination” and “racism,” he reports:

Both blacks and whites subtly try to get a white partner when asked to team up to do an intellectually difficult task. … Clearly, we should spend more effort rigging situations to reduce universal, unconscious racism.

It`s possible that Brooks is being satirical here, although there`s no evidence that his commenters notice the absurdity. 

In general, I suspect that our moral reasoning methods just haven`t caught up to the vast advances in statistical reasoning over the last couple of centuries.