October 04, 2005
The Coffee and Donuts Defense
By
Michelle Malkin
President Bush tells us that he knows his White House
counsel Harriet Miers' heart. I have no doubt that it is
a good one. But a good heart does not a great
Supreme Court justice make.
In
support of Miers' qualifications for the job, longtime
Bush supporter Marvin Olasky reports that Texas Supreme
Court Justice Nathan Hecht endorsed his fellow
parishioner Miers' heart. At Olasky's
World Magazine blog, he
writes:
Miers has been a member of Valley View Christian
Church in Dallas for 25 years, where Hecht has been an
elder. He calls it a "conservative
evangelical church . . . in the vernacular,
fundamentalist, but the media have used that word to
tar us." He says she was on the missions committee
for ten years, taught children in Sunday School, made
coffee, brought
donuts: "Nothing she's asked to do in church is
beneath her."
Olasky
also touted his
interview with Miers' pastor:
I talked yesterday with Miers' pastor, Ron Key, who
for 33 years (until a few weeks ago) was pastor of
Valley View Christian Church in Dallas. "She started
coming to church in 1980. She helped out with kids, made
coffee, furnished donuts, served on missions committee.
She worked out her faith in practical, behind-the-scenes
ways. She doesn't draw attention to herself, she's
humble, self-effacing."
Conservative author and leading blogger Hugh Hewitt
plugged Olasky's interviews in support of Miers.
Conservative writer
Thomas Lifson also noted the coffee-and-donuts
passage in a widely cited piece among Miers'
cheerleaders published at
The American Thinker:
As the court's new junior member, the 60 year old
lady Harriet Miers will finally give a break to
Stephen Breyer, who has been relegated to closing
and opening the door of the conference room, and
fetching beverages for his more senior Justices. Her
ability to do this type of work with no resentment, no
discomfort, and no regrets will at the least endear her
to the others. It will also confirm her as the person
who cheerfully keeps the group on an even keel, more
comfortable than otherwise might be the case with a
level of emotional solidarity.
That's
lovely. But Bush did not promise
grass-roots conservatives that he'd put a
Harry Reid-endorsed
Cheer Bear on the court.
At his
Rose Garden press conference yesterday in response
to the New York Post's
Deborah Orin, who noted criticism of Miers from
conservative women in the legal field, Bush himself
played a variation on the coffee-and-donuts theme:
She is plenty bright. As I mentioned earlier, she was
a pioneer in Texas. She just didn't kind of opine about
things; she actually led.
First woman of the Texas Bar Association; first woman
of the Dallas Bar Association; a woman partner of her
law firm; she led a
major law firm. She was consistently rated as one of
the top 50 women lawyers in the United States—not just
one year, but consistently rated that way, as one of the
top 100 lawyers.
And secondly, I can understand people not, you know,
knowing Harriet. She hasn't been, you know, one of these
publicity hounds. She's been somebody who just quietly
does her job. . . . And I know her. I know her heart. I
know what she believes.
There's
no question that Washington could use a lot more
personal humility. But Bush's derision of those who
"just . . . opine" is bizarre. "Opining," after all,
is what Supreme Court justices do for a living. And it's
precisely Miers' lack of on-the-record opinions about
vital matters of constitutional law that has
conservatives across the country so troubled.
Nobody
is asking Bush to put a "publicity hound" on the
bench. But asking conservatives to trust that the
blank-slate Miers not only has well-formed views on
everything from property rights, the individual right to
bear arms and the proper scope of privacy rights, to the
Commerce Clause, racial preferences and presidential
authority in wartime—but also has the
intellectual candlepower to persuade her potential
colleagues—based on little more than her Sunday
refreshment-retrieving abilities is asking way too much.
Michelle Malkin [email
her] is author of
Invasion: How America Still Welcomes Terrorists,
Criminals, and Other Foreign Menaces to Our Shores.
Click
here for Peter Brimelow’s review. Click
here for Michelle Malkin's website.
COPYRIGHT
CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.