November 13, 2006
NOTE: PLEASE say if you DON'T want your name and/or
email address published when sending VDARE email.
11/12/06 - A Reader In Mexico
Says North Americans Are Just As Cruel To Animals
A Tennessee Reader Speculates That
Bush Is Okay With Congressional Losses…If They Lead To
Amnesty
From: Robert
Randall [e-mail
him]
I'm not normally a conspiracy fan. And I've been a solid
supporter of
President George Bush, excepting only his
amnesty fixation.
But in viewing his reaction to the election and in light
of his throwing Rummy under the bus one day after
the election, a little worm started gnawing in my brain
and it won't go away.
Since he had to know he was going to dump
Secretary of State Don Rumsfeld and start bringing
in people from his father’s empty-suit administration,
is it possible he delayed canning Rummy in order NOT
to increase the GOP vote in congress, hoping a Democrat
takeover would remove the amnesty "obstructionists"
in the House?
Is it further possible that Bush’s ruse succeeded better
than expected and lead to the loss of the Senate as
unforeseen collateral damage?
Bush has mentioned at least twice in recent days how he
intends to push his amnesty proposal… and he's been
looking pretty happy about it while chatting up the
president-elect of Mexico,
Felipe Calderon.
Am I right or should I get fitted for a
tinfoil hat?
Randall
is a retired electrician and, according to him, “a
conservative political junkie.”
Joe Guzzardi
comments:
Randall’s theory, impossible to totally dismiss given
what we know about Bush’s character and priorities, is
making the rounds on Capitol Hill. People don’t want to
believe it…and yet what evidence points in the other
direction?