November 09, 2006
NOTE: PLEASE say if you DON'T want your name and/or
email address published when sending VDARE email.
11/08/06 - A Florida Reader Says
Election Results Are A Major Triumph For Immigration
Control Activists
A Reader Writes About Microloans And
The Market
Re James Fulford's
Post:
Microloans May Be Just Another Form Of Welfare
A Reader writes:
To me as a CPA, there is
only one issue here. Are the interest rates charged by
Grameen Bank high enough to let it make a profit?
If so, there is no welfare. Otherwise, it's another IMF-like
scam
James Fulford replies:
The point of Jeffrey Tucker's article, [Microcredit
or Macrowelfare: The Myth of Grameen]
is that there's no accountability, and no-one can know
for sure if there's more money going in than coming out.
In 2001, the Wall Street
Journal's Daniel Pearl and Michael Phillips
revealed that the repayment rate of their loans
isn't anywhere near what the bank claims, that at least
one quarter of its loans were being used for
consumption, that the bank delays defaults and hides
problem loans, that the bank isn't subject to any kind
of serious supervision, public or private. The
government owns 6% of its assets, while the rest is only
superficially owned by borrowers who cannot sell or
trade their stock.
The
Wall Street Journal
story, [Grameen
Bank, Which Pioneered Loans For the Poor, Has Hit a
Repayment Snag By Daniel Pearl and Michael M.
Phillips, The Wall Street Journal November 27,
2001] has an ominous reminder of why we want
people from this region to stay home; one of the two
writers is now dead.
Daniel Pearl was murdered by jihadis in Karachi in
February of 2002.