June 06, 2009 Saturday ForumA Nebraska Reader Reports Hispanic Bloggers Savaging Sotomayor; etc.From:
Dale Gribble (e-mail
him)
Re: Steve Sailer’s Column:
The Sotomayor Scandal: What Does It Mean For America? Maybe Obama's selection of
Judge Sonia Sotomayor was a brilliant bid for
him to buy time and put an illegal immigration amnesty
on the backburner. However, reviewing some
Latino/Latina blog posts from cyberspace’s diverse
corners, I see cracks in Obama's
Hispandering strategy. Many don't view Sotomayor as one of
their own. For example, this one:
Puertorriqueñas' Stories of Life in Chicago
"Mexicans, however, inhabit a
different ideological space and are often perceived as
both an economic and cultural threat…. the tension
between
Puerto Ricans and Mexicans revolve around
issues of citizenship: Mexicans hate Puerto
Ricans…because they are born American citizens; and
Puerto Ricans resent
Mexicans because they allegedly compete for jobs and
undercut legal workers' wages."
Another website poster described
his view of the ethnic rift between Mexicans and Puerto
Ricans: "Sotomayor
is Puerto Rican, not Mexican. Not all Hispanic groups love
or even like each other. From my years
in
Florida I know that Cubans dislike Puerto Ricans and
loath Mexicans. “Most
Cuban Americans I known think Mexicans are
nothing but trash, peons and PR's, well you get the
picture. Even
Italians and Sicilians dislike each other. I never
really met any other Hispanics (Mexicans, Central and
South Americans, etc) until I moved to
south
Florida. There I quickly learned not all Hispanics
like one another." El
Chez, a Mexican from Texas, was unimpressed
with Sotomayor because she’s not “a true Chicano” "(Not) until a true
Chicano is appointed to the Supreme Court the
Mexican-Americans of this country will truly be
represented. Puerto Ricans and Mexican-Americans are as
different as night and day. Obama might as well have
elected another black to the Supreme Court. " And
Taco from El Paso
had this charming advice for
Sotomayor's Supreme Court colleagues: "My advice to all the other justices:
watch your
hubcaps." With all the splintered ethnic
loyalties that the
Supreme Court apparently will need to represent, we
will soon need to expand its size to about 30 judges. [PermaLink] [Top] [Letters Home] A New York Reader Says Reid Gave Sotomayor “Kiss Of Death”—He Likes Her!From:
Quentin Simpson (e-mail
him) Senate Majority Leader
Harry Reid on
Caroline Kennedy during the heady days when she
seemed a shoo-in for a New York Senate appointment:
“I think Caroline Kennedy would be perfect." [Reid
Urged Paterson to Pick Kennedy, by Chris
Cillizza, Washington Post, December 16, 2008] About Supreme Court nominee
Sonia Sotomayor, Reid said: “We have the whole
package here. We could not have anyone more qualified.”
[Sotomayor
Makes Rounds at the Capitol, by David
Herszenhorn, New York Times, June 2, 2009]
Bad
news for Sotomayor! Being praised by Reid, the
most ill informed man in the Senate, is truly the
kiss of death.
Simpson’s
previous letters about Bruce Springsteen, Nancy Pelosi
and Kennedy are
here,
here and
here.
[PermaLink] [Top] [Letters Home] A California Reader Yearns To Return To Pennsylvania
From: Paul Ciotti (e-mail
him) Re: Joe Guzzardi’s column:
So Long California, Thanks For The Memories!
I
just read Guzzardi’s insightful piece about living in
Pittsburgh after he moved from California. Guzzardi is
so right about western Pennsylvania having such a strong
sense of community.
Although I've lived in
Los Angeles now for three decades, I grew up
in the country 30 miles east of Pittsburgh, near
Greensburg. Now matter
how long I’ve been gone, every time I return to
Pittsburgh the place just feels like home: the people,
their dialect and their conversations (their politics)
seems so right. Here in Los Angeles I've been on a
different page ever since I arrived. I
wish more columnists would do as Guzzardi did and write
about the terrible economic impact on
Los Angeles of having so many
poorly educated illegal aliens in the city.
The
Los
Angeles Times continually frets about
crime,
lack of water,
congested streets,
failing schools but it never admits that those
problems are all connected to the surge of immigrants,
each one of whom costs the state of California thousands
of dollars beginning the minute he crosses the border.
And by the time an illegal immigrant family of four
headed by a father without a high school diploma gets
all the education and other
social services it is “entitled” to the
taxpayer tab will approach
one million dollars over a lifetime. As much as
I would like to
return to Pennsylvania, I’d have to give up my good
journalism job with little prospect of finding a
similar one in Pittsburgh. So in the end, to my regret,
we have chosen to
stay in Los Angeles.
Read Ciotti’s blog comparing life in Westmoreland
County, Pennsylvania with Los Angeles
here.
[PermaLink] [Top] [Letters Home] A California Reader Says Sotomayor “A Mediocrity”, Will Have No Impact
From: J. Silverman (e-mail
him) Re: Today’s
Letter:
A
New Jersey Reader Says The GOP Must Challenge Sonia
Sotomayor’s Nomination If It Expects To Energize Its
Dwindling Base
It’s great that
Barack Obama nominated Sonia Sotomayor to the
Supreme Court. Of course she's a liberal. Who did
you expect Obama to nominate, a bright jurist with a
history of scintillating, intellectually brilliant
decisions? C'mon. But don't you see that it's better
he chose
Sotomayor than, say,
Stanford University Professor Pamela Karlan? Sotomayor is a mediocrity who will
write mediocre, predictably liberal opinions. She has
zero charisma and has not one major decision to her
name. Furthermore, Sotomayor will replace
David Souter—good riddance—so her appointment if
confirmed results in a political wash. At worst, she
will do no more harm than Souter did and probably less
because of her inferior intellect. Imagine on the other hand what someone
like Karlan, a brilliant
hardcore lesbian, would do. America’s entire
left wing would have been galvanized. I sense quiet
disappointment in
their ranks that Karlan didn’t get the nod. I despise both parties, so I don't
really care about
the Republicans. But if opposing
Sotomayor is the way to galvanize their base, as
letter writer J. Richard Burt encourages, Republicans
are in a real pickle. [PermaLink] [Top] [Letters Home] |