An Angry Mexican-German Reader Attempts To Refight The Texas Revolution
NOTE: PLEASE say if you DON`T want your name and/or
email address published when sending VDARE email.
earlier angry Fuessner letter
Mexican Reader Objects To Peter Brimelow`s Proposal To
Seize “Smuggle Island”]
The level of arrogance and
hypocrisy of some US Anglos is simple amazing.
New Spain (Mexico) and Spain were
one and the same from 1521 (the
conquest of Mexico-Tenochtitlan) to 1810 (the
consummation of Mexican independence).
From 1810 to 1848 adds up to another 38 years,
which makes more than three centuries in which those
lands were under Spanish-speaking control, until the
Mexican American war.
The US sent hordes of legal and
(mostly) illegal Anglo immigrants to Mexican Texas (and
to Alta California after gold was found there). They did
not obey Mexican laws, refused to be assimilated into
Spanish culture (encouraged by US diplomatic
representatives—does that sounds familiar to today`s
Anglos?) and remained loyal to the US, dishonoring all
previous agreements contracted with the Mexican
"In obtaining land grants in Texas, Anglo immigrants agreed to become
Mexican citizens, obey Mexican laws, accept the official
Catholic faith, learn Spanish, and take other steps to
become fully assimilated as law-abiding citizens.
However, over the years, it became clear that these
settlers, now Anglo-Mexicans, were not becoming
integrated into the nation and that Anglo immigration
had become a problem . . . The strains and disagreements
ultimately led to the Texas Revolution in 1835."
note: This quotation, inserted by Sr. Fuessner, is from the Harvard Encyclopedia of American Ethnic Groups.
Texas` supposed independence in
1836 was never (and still is not) recognized by Mexico
because it was won by cowardly and treacherous actions
(attacking the Mexican troops in a cowardly way in the
night when they were sleeping, surely those Anglo Texans
did not have the slightest sense of what honor was in a
battle), and the
treaties of Velazco and Guadalupe Hidalgo would be
absolutely illegal under today`s international laws.
The loss of Northern Mexico (Texas,
Nuevo Mexico, Alta California, etc) was settled with the
end of the Mexican American war, before that those were
still Mexican territories. But some US
Mormons (some of whom are hypocritical
polygamists in today`s US) in what is now Utah
attempted to enter
"El Valle del Lago Salado" and founded Salt Lake City there before
the signing of the Guadalupe Hidalgo Treaty, which means
they were illegally founded a city on Mexican soil.
Regarding as that was paid with
American gold, yes it was but Mexico was forced to
accept it against its own free will, if a girl is raped
and afterwards her rapist gives her some cash does that
make the act more legitimate? Of course not!
Therefore the constant
paranoia of some VDARE.com`s readers (and other US
Anglos) about becoming a
in Texas in contrast with Spanish people, it is
simple poetic justice, it is EXACTLY the same thing US
illegal Anglo settlers did back in 1836-1848 in Texas
and the rest of the stolen lands when they belonged to
Mexico. It is only God`s justice, giving the US the
payment it deserves for the very same actions it
performed about 150 years ago. Life is just, isn`t it?
The US as any other nation has
every right to demand respect for its sovereignty. But
when the US has failed in the past to respect other
countries` sovereignty, what is that? Blatant hypocrisy!
A person with a decent level of
common sense and education knows that people who wins
wars writes and transform history to its convenience,
perhaps in a couple of decades US textbooks will say
that the 2003 invasion of Iraq was legal, and supported
by the UN and many nations before and after finding
weapons of mass destruction there.
No matter how many biased facts or
dates you quote or want to firmly believe, the day in
which you will convince any Mexican or Latin people for
that matter that the US legally acquired or purchased
Texas, California, New Mexico or that BS WILL NEVER
HAPPEN, they were illegally invaded and conquered!!!
Anyway the US should be given back
to England if you are going to start arguing about
Mexico being given back to Spain with biased arguments
regarding historical events.
Despite the fact I am a native
Spanish speaker I am
writing this in English because it is very unlikely
to find an average US Anglo citizen (I am talking about
ordinary people not professors or businessmen for that
matter) who can
speak at least one foreign language in a fluent way.
Have a nice day, xenophobic
I have carefully corrected all Sr. Fuessner`s
errors in English grammar, but not changed or left out
any of his points. Most of them are wrong, and some
contain errors of fact.
I will take the trouble to
deny that night attacks, whether carried out by the
George Washington, or modern-day Special Forces, are
cowardly and treacherous. In fact, they are daring and
reckless—the kind of thing a band of gallant
revolutionaries will undertake against a decadent
And calling the Salt Lake
City area by its Spanish name doesn`t change the fact
that when the Mormons trekked there, they found no
Mexicans or Spaniards, only Ute Indians.
The point I was making is
that while the governments in Mexico City and Madrid
might call a lot of the land north of the current border
they had no more settled most of it than the US has
settled the face of the moon.
However, the reason we`re
printing Sr. Fuessner`s letter is to let people know
that this how a lot of Mexicans think. It`s what`s
taught in Mexican schools, and for
that matter in
American schools, and more and more people who think
like this are coming to America to live.