A Reader Objects To Michelle Malkin`s Pro-War Columns; Peter Brimelow Replies


November 07, 2005

NOTE: PLEASE say if you DON`T want your name and/or
email address published when sending VDARE email.

A
Tech Worker Calculates Specter/Kennedy H-1B Visa Scheme
Means $3 Billion Net Annual Loss To Treasury

From [Name Withheld]

Re: Michelle Malkin`s Column “All the News
That`s Fit To Omit”
 
 

I ask you again, why is Michelle Malkin
on VDARE.COM? She is a hack, a shill, for the
Republican Party. She writes more about our
misguided Iraq War effort than anything else.
 What in the hell does she have to do with
immigration reform?  And why should
I continue to donate to VDARE.COM when it insists on wasting space and money on her?


Peter
Brimelow replies:

We
normally get this complaint about


Paul Craig Roberts
, who is pugnaciously on the


other side
of the Iraq War debate. We carry them
both because both are among the very few syndicated
columnists who do speak out on immigration—for example,


here
and


here
. We have to pay for all of their columns, so we
figure we might as well post them all. Similarly, we
post all of


Joe Guzzardi`s

Lodi
News-Sentinel columns as a courtesy, although only a
few are directly about immigration.


As I have
repeatedly


said
, VDARE.COM is a single-issue website
focused
on immigration and the


National Question
—whether
the U.S. can survive as the political expression of a
particular people. We are a coalition. Many of our
writers disagree on other issues, sometimes fiercely.
But they are united on the overwhelming importance of
this issue. It is because so many of our readers endorse
our strategy, and


donate
, that we are able to keep the immigration
reform point of view before the public.