NOTE: PLEASE say if you DON`T want your name and/or
email address published when sending VDARE email.
Dave Shanken (email
Who`s Gaga Over Obama” by Kevin Lamb
asserts that the Communist Party
supports President Obama, therefore Obama is in some way
This is absurd. The motivation for [CPUSA National
Chair] Sam Webb`s support may be sincere. It may be a
ploy to advance some agenda. It may just be Webb
choosing to support the best of a bad lot. I don`t know;
neither does Kevin Lamb.
More importantly, I have a problem with the logic of
asserting: that because A supports B, then B supports A.
This is bogus, as anyone trying to control immigration
should be aware of. Consider the immigrant promotion
rant: Racists support immigration restriction, therefore
immigration restrictionists are racist.
Long ago, to demonstrate the absurdity of this
thinking, a liberal professor of social science told my
Pope Pius, and Hitler all strongly opposed
child labor. Therefore we may conclude that: Stalin
was a Roman Catholic, Pope Pius was a Nazi, and Hitler
was a Communist."
On this occasion, a liberal made good sense.
Obama`s socialist affiliations surfaced last October
when researchers turned up archival documents (now
Obama`s membership in the New Party, a Marxist
political party largely composed of activists from
Democratic Socialists of America and ACORN.
of reader Shanken`s argument: not all progressives are
communists, but all communists are progressives. Radical
egalitarianism is the ideological bond that unites
Obama`s supporters. Radical egalitarians—whether
conventional liberals or revolutionary communists—share
the same goal (even if their strategies and tactics
fanatical leveling of American society.
The important point of Comrade Webb`s enthusiastic
presence at Obama`s inauguration is that
Obama`s election represents a coalition victory for
far-left activists, which includes liberals,
neo-Marxists, socialists, and communists.