August 06, 2003
Beltway Right Declares Bankruptcy
By Peter Bradley
[Also by Peter Bradley:
Racism 101 At The University Of Virginia]
"Do Conservatives Need to Declare Independence
from the GOP?" asked the headline on the July 10
National Review Online. (The article is also in the
July 27 print edition, which is just going off
newsstands.)
To someone like me who became a conservative in
the early-to-mid 1990's, it was a familiar question.
Back then, the GOP was scared to death of alienating
conservatives and causing a mass exodus to a third
party. But that time is long gone.
In making their case against the Republicans'
"Left Turn," the NR editors pointed to the
recent
Supreme Court rulings on affirmative action and
gay rights, as well as to the $400 billion dollar
pharmaceutical drug bill:
"Republicans have
been complicit in each of these debacles. Both the
affirmative-action and sodomy decisions were written by
Reagan appointees. President Bush actually cheered the
affirmative-action decision for recognizing the value of
"diversity." Bush has requested spending increases, and
not just for defense and homeland security. . But let it
not be said that the president has led his party astray.
Many congressional Republicans have strayed even more
enthusiastically."
Why this surprised NR is anybody's guess.
Even before the 2000 election, George W. Bush was
on record as supporting bilingual education and
high rates of immigration. When pressed on
affirmative action by Al Gore in their
televised debate, Bush famously and pathetically
asked the moderator to move on to the next question. If
September 11 never occurred, I think it’s likely we
would have
already seen some form of
amnesty for illegal aliens (although Steve Sailer
did
predict this particular Bush betrayal would not
succeed).
The rest of the GOP establishment is no better.
On the same day, NRO ran an
article by Henry Payne about how the Michigan
Republican establishment is coming out against a ballot
initiative by
Ward Connerly to end affirmative action in that
state. "I fear this ballot initiative would openly
serve to further divide people along racial lines, which
would be entirely counterproductive," said GOP party
chair Betsy DeVos. "Our hope is that our opposition
prevents it from getting on the ballot," adds Greg
McNeilly, executive director of the Michigan GOP.
There are a few strong conservatives left in the
Republican Party—Colorado Representative
Tom Tancredo speaks out tirelessly against
immigration and Colorado Gov. Bill Owens
publicly disagreed with the
Supreme Court ruling on affirmative action.
But the GOP as a
whole has not just dropped the issues comprising the
"National Question"—affirmative action, immigration,
bilingual education—it is often on the wrong side.
So obvious is this that even
George Will and
Andrew Sullivan have noticed it.
Politically, it’s all too disgustingly
understandable. Personally, I have known since 1996 that
the GOP was not going to carry the ball on the National
Question, and have long stopped voting for the
Stupid Party. But too few conservatives went along
with me in voting for Pat Buchanan in 2000 (he got 0.4
percent of the vote). Most were tired of Bill Clinton
and believed Bush would be "better than Gore." While
this attitude helped defeat Al Gore in 2000, it has left
Bush with no right flank to worry about.
Now that Buchanan's political career seems over,
there is literally no one disaffected conservatives can
turn to. Karl Rove knows this—and that is why we have
talk of immigration amnesties, the
lynching of Trent Lott, increased funding for
bilingual education and Head Start, support for mandated
"diversity" and affirmative action, and the "Hispanic
strategy."
It is not just nationalist issues that get this
treatment. Last month, Christian leaders
announced they were not satisfied with Republican
National Committee Chairman
Marc Racicot's meeting with the Log Cabin Republicans and the Bush administration's lack of support for
Sen. Rick Santorum (who had compared homosexuality
to incest and bestiality). This threat was met with
total indifference by the
GOP Establishment. This should tell "moral
conservatives" that they are the next to be dropped from
the Republican "big tent."
Without any threat of defections from the right,
the Republicans can move to the center-left on cultural
and social issues. As long as they are to the right of
the Democrats, the GOP Establishment thinks it can keep
its conservative base while (supposedly) attracting
blacks, Hispanics and “white suburban moderates.”
In addition, Bush has delivered to some extent on
tax cuts, free trade and a strong military—three staples
of Beltway conservatism. All of this is packaged with
enough flag waving and personal references to Jesus to
keep orthodox “conservatives” happy.
The NR editorial concluded: "as recent
events underscore, this is not a bad time for
conservatives to declare their independence from
the GOP Establishment."
But NR's only concrete suggestion was to
support conservative Rep. Pat Toomey over liberal Sen.
Arlen Specter in the Pennsylvania Republican primary for
U.S. Senate.
The real time to declare independence from the
GOP would have been in the mid-90's through 2000. The
Republican Establishment never embraced Props
187,
209 or
227 and didn't challenge affirmative action,
bilingual education or mass immigration, even though
they had the votes. It was partly out of frustration
with Republican cowardice on
social issues that Pat Buchanan bolted to the
Reform party in 2000. National Review,
supposedly the flagship publication of American
conservatism, could have urged a protest vote for
Buchanan. But
in fact it was one of Buchanan's fiercest
detractors. The magazine was also one of the most
slavish supporters of Bush.
While there are no current political alternatives
for conservatives, many are starting to realize that
Bush is no friend on social issues.
Michelle Malkin,
Ann Coulter and even NR's own
John Derbyshire are just some of the conservative
writers who are not afraid to criticize the GOP. Popular
web sites such as
VDARE.com and
LewRockwell.com routinely put the spotlight on
Republican betrayal of conservatives. Activists such as
Ward Connerly,
Ron Unz and
Craig Nelsen continue to take their campaigns to the
American people despite the open hostility of the GOP
Establishment.
Eventually a real conservative leader will
emerge.
But when such a leader does emerge, and offers a
political alternative to the Stupid Party, we can be
sure that NR will be the first to
editorialize against him.
Peter Bradley [send him
email] works in
Washington, D.C.