May 03, 2004
Memo From Mexico, By
Allan Wall
An Ominous Triumph For Derbez In California
Luis Ernesto Derbez, Mexico's Foreign Minister, was
making the rounds in Los Angeles last month, and it
appears he accomplished a lot.
I have
to hand it to the guy: he is cunning. And, in contrast
to previous Foreign Minister,
Jorge Castañeda, Derbez is more, well—diplomatic.
Castañeda is intellectually brilliant of course, and we
haven't heard the last of him. He's now running for
president of Mexico. But he wasn't really a team player,
and had a habit of ruffling the feathers of fellow Fox
administration colleagues—including the
Presidente's wife, which is never a good idea.
Not
that Derbez' replacement of Castañeda resulted in any
change of policy. Both men have worked for open borders
with the U.S. (one way only, of course) because that's
what Vicente Fox wants. Derbez has even made it clear—to
a
Mexican audience—that Mexico doesn’t intend to offer
anything in exchange for a “migratory accord.”
In
fact, Derbez is now working with other foreign leaders
to
lobby U.S. members of Congress on behalf of yet more
immigrants.
For
such a short visit, Derbez did an impressive amount of
networking.
He met
with Governor Schwarzenegger, with Mexican diplomats,
labor leaders, California Senator Gil Cedillo,
representatives of California-based Mexican
organizations and the
"Instituto de los Mexicanos en el Exterior" [Institute
of Mexicans Abroad]. He also gave a well-crafted
speech on U.S.- Mexican relations at the University of
California.
(Derbez:
It's in U.S. interest to legalize Mexican migrants
By Eduardo Santana. San Diego, Apr 23 (EFE))
Derbez
couldn't resist taking a swipe at
Samuel Huntington's article
The Hispanic Challenge, which the Foreign
Minister called "absurd, embarrassing and dangerous.”
But if you read my
VDARE.COM article last week, you know that’s mild
for a Mexican Huntington-hater.
As I
said before, Derbez is diplomatic.
In
Derbez' speech, he skillfully promoted Mexican
immigration, to an American audience, as a necessity for
the United States. We have an
aging population, you see, and Derbez says we're
going to have a
labor shortage so we need immigration.
This
is not a valid argument—for example, we could
mechanize more, like
Japan—but it sounds very reasonable and it
bamboozled a lot of people.
Taking
a cue from Huntington, Derbez unleashed an interesting
cultural argument of his own:
"We Mexicans share culture and values with the United
States. We are both
Christian,
law-abiding and
hard-working. At some point, the U.S. will have to
ask itself if it prefers that those jobs be filled with
immigrants from Islamic countries, Africa or Asia."
(Actually, Mexican politics are
rabidly secular. Mexico is the only country in Latin
America which
prohibited anyone under the age of 18 from viewing
The Passion of the Christ—even if accompanied by
a parent. This is the first time I've heard a Mexican
politician refer to Mexico as a Christian nation. Could
Derbez be appealing to American Christian
voters?)
In
effect, Derbez is telling Americans: "Wouldn't you
rather have Mexicans working in your country than
Asians, Africans or
Muslim terrorists?"
Of
course, the way things are now, it's
"all of the above,” even the threat of
terrorism.
But in
making this argument, Derbez tacitly concedes that there
are differences among immigrant groups. He suggests that
it’s better for the U.S. to have Mexican immigrants
than immigrants from those
other Third World countries.
Americans, however, might decide, along with Huntington,
that Hispanic immigration is already posing a major
threat to our nation's unity and identity.
Derbez
sounds forward-looking, progressive, as he rejects
"the antiquated vision of the border." He told his
listeners that "The border is no longer in
San Diego-Tijuana, it's located in
Chicago,
New York, Atlanta."
Derbez
is right, of course. But whether it's a good thing or
not is another matter entirely.
In his
meeting with Mexican clubs and the Instituto de los
Mexicanos en el Exterior on April 23rd, Derbez had
more interesting things to say. For example:
"There is an interaction between our communities in
the United States and our communities in Mexico. This
interaction is beneficial for both countries. The
communities represent the fundamental axis of this
relation between the two nations if we wish to arrive to
the final solution of what would be the correct
migratory accord for the two countries."
In
other words, the "fundamental axis" of the
Mexico-U.S. relationship is that between Mexican
“communities in the United States" and
Mexican "communities in Mexico" and
this will determine the "correct" migratory accord.
And
you thought the
American people had some say in the matter?
Derbez
also met with Gil Cedillo, California legislator and
perennial campaigner for
driver's licenses for illegal aliens. Can you guess
what they discussed?
According to a communiqué issued by SRE (Mexican Foreign
Ministry), the purpose of the meeting was "to be
informed of recent advances that California legislators
have achieved to approve legislation permitting persons
who lack documents [a.k.a. illegal aliens] to obtain
a driver license." [El secretario
Derbez también mantuvo un encuentro con el senador Gil
Cedillo, a fin de conocer cuáles han sido los recientes
avances que los legisladores de California han logrado
para lograr que sea aprobada la legislación que permita
a personas que carecen de documentos poder obtener su
licencia de conducir] (SRE
Comunicado de Prensa No. 78, April 23rd, 2004)
So
here we have a California legislator meeting with the
Mexican Foreign Minister to discuss driver's licenses
for illegal aliens.
How
convenient. And Derbez met with California’s Governor
Schwarzenegger. But, rather than the
usual Mexican
Schwarzenegger-stomping, the Foreign Minister
obviously decided he could catch more flies with honey.
He described the meeting as “agreeable and positive.”
According to Reuters:
"Schwarzenegger and Derbez...discussed ways to make
Mexican identification documents used by undocumented
workers in California more secure.....[Derbez]
said the Mexican consulate and the governor's staff
would work together to find ways to improve the security
of Mexican documents so they can be accepted by the
state."
These
“Mexican documents” are of course the
"matricula consular." And “the security of
Mexican documents" is not even the principal issue
here. It's irrelevant how secure the matricula is—the
real problem is that American officials accept them as
de facto legalization documents.
Derbez
announced that President Vicente Fox would
meet with Governor Schwarzenegger in September—their
first meeting. The meeting is scheduled to focus
on…immigration and border issues.
Hmmm.
Have you noticed how, increasingly, border state
governors seem to be carrying out
their own foreign policy when they negotiate with
the Mexican government? Isn't that a
violation of the U.S. Constitution (Article 1,
Section 10—"No State shall....enter into any
agreement or compact ...with a foreign power...")?
We
had better keep an eye on Schwarzenegger and Fox next
September.
And,
of course, on Foreign Minister Derbez. As I say, the guy
is cunning.
American citizen Allan Wall lives and works legally in
Mexico, where he holds an FM-2 residency and work
permit, but serves six weeks a year with the Texas Army
National Guard, in a unit composed almost entirely of
Americans of Mexican ancestry. His VDARE.COM articles
are archived
here; his
FRONTPAGEMAG.COM articles are archived
here; his
website is
here. Readers
can contact Allan Wall at
allan39@prodigy.net.mx.