Victim`s Mother Prevails—Child Molester Deported!

by Juan Mann on Loretta Schloerb`s case:

Loretta Schloerb of New Jersey
fought the immigration bureaucracy . . . and won!

As a mother, Loretta could not bear
the prospect of the foreign national who repeatedly
molested her daughter ten years ago being officially
allowed to keep his

green card
and remain in the United States.

So she entered the
behind-closed-doors realm of the federal immigration
bureaucracy and testified against the child molester in
U.S. Immigration Court proceedings in Newark, N.J.,
before the Department of Justice`s Executive Office for
Immigration Review (EOIR).

Even after

the fight initially in EOIR Immigration
Court, Loretta did not give up. She enlisted the support

at the highest levels of the

Office of the Principal Legal Advisor
at the
Department of Homeland Security`s Immigration and
Customs Enforcement (ICE)

The government attorneys appealed
the EOIR decision to the DOJ`s

Board of Immigration Appeals

And Loretta`s perseverance paid

On May 12, BIA member

Neil P. Miller
entered an order of

against the child molester, reversing
the original EOIR Immigration Court ruling.

Legal Eagles can read the "unpublished"
BIA decision here:
Board of Immigration Appeals
[PDF] – In re: Jose Barrios Castilla, dated May
18, 2005.

(Note that only BIA decisions designated as “published
are effective as legal precedent that must be recognized
by the federal government.)

The BIA decision in the Barrios
case sustained an appeal filed by DHS/ICE attorney Susan
G. Roy on behalf of the government. The decision
reversed a December, 2003, decision by EOIR immigration

William K. Strasser
of Newark, N.J.

In Immigration Court, Strasser had

allowed Barrios to remain in the United
States, despite a 1995 conviction for endangering the
welfare of a child through

sexual conduct
. Barrios is an uncle (by marriage) of
Loretta`s daughter.

BIA member Miller threw the book at
both Strasser and Barrios in reversing the discretionary
grant of relief under

Section 212 (c)
of the Immigration Act.

Miller wrote:

Immigration Judge appeared to look behind the
[and] speculated that the
respondent`s [Barrios`] criminal actions may have been
related to alcohol use . . .

"Moreover, the Immigration Judge determined that because
the respondent completed a 2-year program he
demonstrated rehabilitation, but we
[the BIA]
cannot find that completion of a program necessarily
demonstrates rehabilitation, especially since the
respondent did not fully accept responsibility for his

note the testimony of the respondent`s son who stated
that he would not feel comfortable leaving his children
alone with the respondent

According to previous reports by
Loretta, Barrios has remained detained in federal

ICE custody
at least throughout the appeal process
since the DHS/ICE appealed Strasser`s original decision
in December, 2003.

Whether Barrios will choose to
fight the case further while remaining

is unknown.

Technically, the May 12 decision by
the BIA now constitutes the "final agency action"
by the DOJ`s EOIR in the case. But criminal alien
residents in EOIR proceedings are free to persist in

appeals and motions
to the bitter end, if they

There will be no way to know
whether Barrios is actually physically deported, unless
Loretta happens to receive a courtesy call someday from
the government with the good news.

As I`ve

at length—and as has been


Michelle Malkin
—the way the Immigration and
Nationality Act and the federal immigration bureaucracy
are rigged, EOIR Immigration Court proceedings are
usually "not
over until the alien wins

But Loretta would have none of

She did everything in her power to
see to it that the child predator who wreaked havoc on
her family would be deported.

And because of her efforts, Loretta
has provided readers with a rare glimpse into
the EOIR Immigration Court process as it unfolded.

It`s an antidote to the
pro-criminal alien

penned by the Treason Lobby`s

handmaidens in the media.

Loretta`s insider account also
exposes the public relations myth that the ICE`s

Operation Predator
(arresting sex offenders for
immigration violations) is NOT a sure thing when it
comes to getting predators actually deported.

In the federal immigration
bureaucracy of EOIR Immigration Court and its appellate
process, there`s unfortunately much more involved in
getting a convicted child molester out of the country.

Sadly, Loretta learned the truth
about the EOIR from the inside . . . and it wasn`t

But Loretta`s story is a mere day
in the life of the federal immigration bureaucracy.

Just how many

child predators
and convicted criminal alien
residents have been allowed by EOIR immigration judges
to keep their "green cards" despite

laundry lists
of crimes . . . no one knows.

In fiscal year 2004, the EOIR
granted over 33,000 applications for "relief"
without specifying in its annual

shameful statistics
which applications involved
criminal alien residents, and what type of

relief applications
were being granted. [See EOIR`s

statistical yearbook,

page 19.]

Doesn`t America deserve to know the
truth about how many criminal alien residents the EOIR
is allowing to remain in the United States?

So until EOIR`s litigation-based
system for deporting illegal aliens and criminal alien
residents is

—and foreign criminals are summarily
removed from our shores—America is going to need a lot
more Lorettas.

This one woman`s extraordinary
effort to obtain justice will be an historic part of the
process by which Americans realize just what really

goes on
behind the EOIR`s closed doors.

Juan Mann [send him
] is a lawyer and the proprietor of