Show your support by purchasing VDARE.com merchandise. 
VDARE.com's Amazon connection has been restored! Remember to enter Amazon via the VDARE.com link and we get a commission on any purchases you make—at no cost to you!
As a researcher who prefers to work at home, the internet is a godsend for me. A few Google searches, quick clicks on authoritative websites, and I have the data I need to write on virtually any topic. No more long hours in dusty library stacks!
But, perhaps because I honed my research skills the old fashioned way, I am wary of the disembodied factoids common on the Internet. Allan Wall recently put in perspective one widely circulated email contrasting US and Mexican treatment of immigrants. Another example: an email making assertions about illegal immigration into Califonia mostly sourced to the LA Times, but without dates, authors, or urls. (See Snopes.com for the original email.)
Others, including bloggers at the LA Times, have tried myth-busting this one. But they have neither our expertise, nor our patriotic motivation and seem more interested in protecting the good name of illegal aliens.
Bottom line on both these emails: they are sometimes careless, exaggerated or guesses, possibly accurate, in areas where the authorities refuse to collect data. But they do reflect the underlying reality better than, say, the Wall Street Journal Editorial Page.
Here's my point by point commentary.
Too high. The magnitude of the underground (informal) labor force in LA, and its illegal alien component, is addressed in a 2006 study of the Pat Brown Institute:
"Our best estimate is that on a typical day in 2004 there were 679,000
informal workers in [LA] county and
This statement implies that, at most, 15% of LA County's labor force is paid off the books—but that illegal aliens could account for as much as 61 percent of this group.
IIn other words, the real fraction of the LA County work force that is illegal is nearer 10%. Of course, that's still extraordinary.
Sort of. This is from Heather Mac Donald's study published by the Center For Immigration Studies. [Crime and the Illegal Alien, CIS Backgrounder, June 2004.] While LAPD officers apparently told her this, there is no corroborating data posted at the Department's website. Indeed, such info may not be formally collected due to the city's sanctuary laws.
Mac Donald actually used the term "outstanding warrants," which casts her statement in a somewhat different light. Illegals may well be disproportionately represented in outstanding homicide warrants because they are more likely to flee before their cases are adjudicated—not necessarily because they commit a larger share of murders. Homicide warrants can remain outstanding for years; the 95 percent does not pertain to warrants issued in a particular year or period of time.
This interpretation is supported by a 1998UC-Davis summary off immigration issues that notes:
"The Los Angeles Police Department has a 12-year old Foreign Prosecution
Unit that pursues suspects who fled the
"The Foreign Prosecution Unit was founded in 1985, after
a study found that
nearly half [ER: Emphasis added]
of the LAPD's outstanding arrest warrants involved
Mexican nationals who were presumed to have fled the
country. The FPU works with Interpol to find suspects
who flee abroad and then prepares the evidence so that
the person can be arrested and prosecuted. The FPU
clears about one-third of its cases, compared to
two-thirds of all homicide cases in
"Nearly half" is not the same as 95 percent. But it's still appalling.
Maybe. Nine of
"Top Ten Most Wanted" on the LAPD website had
Hispanic surnames, when we checked on
Too high. I've just looked into
births to immigrant mothers in
But the reality is extraordinary
enough: Immigrants in total accounted for 54% of LA
births in
Not exactly. The figure, stated as 25% in some internet postings, appears to trace from Heather MacDonald's April 2005 testimony before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims:
"The LA
McDonald's statement pertains to
all criminal aliens—i.e., all immigrants convicted of
crimes. This
obviously includes both legal and illegal immigrants,
from
Who knows? As we've seen (point # 1, above) about a quarter of LA County's 10-plus million people are illegal aliens i.e. some 2.5 million. Many illegals do live in crowded housing conditions and some undoubtedly sleep in garages. But that's about all we know. Neither the U.S. Census nor LA authorities collect data on garage-dwellers, since such conversions are illegal.
Up to a point. This appears loosely related to Heather Mac Donald's April 2005 congressional testimony:
"No one knows for certain the percentage of illegal in gangs, thanks in
large part to sanctuary laws themselves. But various
estimates exist:
--A confidential California Department of Justice study reported in 1995
that 60 percent of the 20,000-strong
18th Street Gang in southern
Note that Mac Donald sources the statement to the California Department of Justice (not the FBI), and it pertains to one gang—a gang that likely has the highest rate of illegal membership. A search of the FBI's website revealed several reports on LA gangs, but no data on illegal alien membership.
Probably too high. I found no discussion on HUD's LA website. (Why not?) However, this statement appears on another website supposedly devoted to debunking internet froth:
"HUD provides no data for LA County. They do admit that at least 5% of
all HUD housing in
Almost. This from e-rumor, a website devoted to debunking internet froth of all types:
"As the Spanish-speaking population of
Definitely in the ballpark. The 2000 Census reported 6.0 million residents of LA County spoke English exclusively or "very well" with other languages, and 3.33 million spoke Spanish. The figures count people 5 years and over only.
Why the "but"? There's no apparent reason to link these two facts--unless you believe only crop pickers are worthy of, or eligible for, welfare.
Regarding the first point, 3
percent of illegal alien workers are employed in
"farming"
according to the
As for welfare, illegal immigrants themselves are not eligible—but their U.S.-born children are, if parental income is low enough. In 2007 27 percent of households headed by illegal aliens received Medicaid, 33 percent received food assistance such as food stamps, WIC, or school lunch benefits, while less than 1% received outright cash assistance. A whopping 40 percent received least one major welfare program, according to a CIS study. [Steve Camarota, "Immigrants in the United States, 2007: A Profile of America's Foreign-born Population," Center for Immigration Studies, November 2007.]
An understatement! Pew Research
estimates that 82% of
A misunderstanding. In 2004 27.2%
of Federal prison inmates were
"criminal
aliens," non-citizens convicted of a crime. This
group includes resident aliens—i.e., people here
legally, albeit not long enough to become naturalized
citizens. No data is collected on what percent of
criminal aliens are illegals. [GAO, Letter to
Congressman John N. Hostettler,
My conclusion: This email is accurate enough to suggest that the writer was not malicious but simply an amateur making mistakes in a difficult technical area.
But at least this writer is a patriotic amateur. What do we conclude about professionals in government and the MSM who refuse to face the facts at all?
Edwin S. Rubenstein (email him) is President of ESR Research Economic Consultants in Indianapolis.