Is America Moving Right?



Whether or not Republican Scott Brown captures the
Senate seat in Massachusetts today, his surging and
successful campaign is a fire bell in the night for the
Party of Government.


For Brown has run as an independent, an outsider, a
protest candidate. His principal target: the health care
reform bill that is the altarpiece of the Barack Obama
presidency and lifetime achievement of Harry Reid and
Nancy Pelosi.


For a full year, Obama, Reid, Pelosi and the leading
acolytes of their party and media auxiliaries have been
selling this plan as a historic Democratic reform to
rival the

Civil Rights Act
and

Social Security.

Yet in this Kennedy compound, the only state to be
carried by

George McGovern,
people want to take this bill out
to the crossroads at midnight and kill it. Brown made
this race competitive by promising to bring the wooden
stake to drive through its heart.


How Democratic is Massachusetts?


Democratic registration is three times that of the
Republicans. The party controls both houses of the
legislature by huge margins, and holds every statewide
office, both U.S. Senate seats and all 10 U.S. House
seats. Massachusetts is a Democrat fiefdom, a one-party
state.


Independents, however, outnumber Democrats, an
indication of the growing disillusionment with both
national parties in America


What, then, is the message out of Massachusetts?


For Democrats, the only good news is they got this
wake-up call in January. They are on notice now that if
they push their health care reform plan to passage and
attempt to ride to victory on Democratic registration
this fall, they could be vulnerable in almost every
state.


Massachusetts today is conclusive evidence that Obama
and his party misread the election returns of 2008.


By November, George W. Bush was at 27 percent; 80
percent thought the country was headed in the wrong
direction; 92 percent thought the economy was poor or
worse. As James Carville said, if the party can`t win
with these numbers, it ought to go into a new line of
work.

The one attribute Americans wanted most in its next
president was that he be for "change." And Obama
had cornered the market on change, while John McCain had
voted 90 percent with Bush.


But instead of seeing the election as a repudiation of
the Bush Republicans, Obama, Pelosi and Reid read it as
an embrace of their wonderful selves and a national cry
for more government.

Following Rahm`s Rule—never let a crisis go to
waste!—Obama and his party took the

collapse of the banks
and spreading

economic chaos
to attempt the greatest leap forward
in federal power since World War II.

Most Americans understood candidate Obama`s health care
plans to mean that folks who could not afford care would
be able to get it, whatever their conditions. As the
plan evolved, however, it grew in the eyes of the public
into precisely what the

Tea Party
and

town-hall protesters
said it was: a federal takeover
of one-sixth of the economy. Bureaucrats would decide
who gets what care, when and for how long. And a panoply
of new taxes, fees and regulations would be imposed,
producing a revenue windfall for the federal government
and a quantum leap in power for federal bureaucrats.


What Massachusetts is telling the nation is that the Tea
Party people have won the argument, America doesn`t want
this bill and either put it down or we remember in
November.


Indeed, the crisis of the Democratic Party today may be
found in
a story this Monday by CNS.

It seems that an ABC/Washington
Post
poll found that, when asked, "Generally
speaking, would you say you favor smaller government
with fewer services or larger government with more
services?"
58 percent of Americans favored smaller
government with fewer services to 38 percent who favor
more government and more services.

The Post,
however, reportedly saw fit not to mention the results
of this question in its news story about the poll.


Which is understandable. Why would you publish a poll
that says three in five Americans reject your political
philosophy?


In the near term, what is happening in Massachusetts is
good news for the GOP.


What it says is that, no matter the weakness of the
party label or brand, independents will vote Republican
if that is the only alternative to the party in power.


The GOP can thus run this fall as the only effective
force left in Washington that can block the Democrats`
drive for power. The GOP problem arises when the
presidential season begins in spring 2011.

For what Republican ran last time for cutting back
George Bush`s big government? Who ran against expansion
of

NATO into Ukraine
and Georgia? Who opposed war in
Iraq? Who stood up and said no to
No
Child Left Behind
or Medicare coverage of
prescription drugs?

Who in the Republican Party today is calling for a Barry
Goldwater-like rollback of federal power and federal
programs? Except
Ron
Paul.

COPYRIGHT

CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.



Patrick J. Buchanan

needs

no introduction
to
VDARE.COM readers; his book
 
State
of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and
Conquest of America
, can
be ordered from Amazon.com. His latest book

is Churchill,
Hitler, and "The Unnecessary War": How
Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost
the World,

reviewed

here
by

Paul Craig Roberts.